Teachers’ Perceptions of Assessment and Feedback Practices in Finland’s Foreign Language Classes During the Covid-19 Pandemic
Abstract
In this paper, we examine how the Covid-19 pandemic affected the quality of teachers’ assessment and feedback in Finland’s foreign language classes during the remote teaching period in spring 2020. Multifaceted assess-ment and feedback practices are underscored in Finland’s core curricula, forming a focal aspect of learning. Therefore, we studied teachers’ percep-tions of their assessment and feedback practices at different school levels during the remote teaching period and how they considered the remote teaching period in students’ final assessment at the end of basic education. Data were collected through an online questionnaire and analysed using both quantitative and qualitative methods. Most of the 176 respondents felt that assessment and feedback practices were implemented successful-ly, and the final assessment was realistic and reliable. However, teachers’ perceptions were mixed on several issues, and differences were found in the amount and form of feedback between respondents and school lev-els or what competence demonstration or assignments to count towards the final assessment. In addition, the remote teaching period usually had less influence on students’ final grades than the last few months of basic education. The results suggest that more attention should be paid to en-hancing feedback practices and connecting with students during remote teaching periods.
Downloads
References
Ahtiainen, R., Asikainen, M., Heikonen, L., Hienonen, N., Hotulainen, R., Lindfors, P., Lindgren, E., Lintuvuori, M., Oinas, S., Rimpelä, A., & Vainikainen, M–P. (2020). Koulunkäynti, opetus ja hyvinvointi kouluyhteisössä koronaepidemian aikana: Ensitulokset [Schoolgoing, teaching and well-being in school community during the corona pandemic: Initial results]. HEA, NEDIS, REAL.
Anderson, L. W. (2003). Classroom assessment: Enhancing the quality of teacher decision making. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Butler, S. M., & McMunn, N. D. (2014). A teacher’s guide to classroom assessment: Understanding and using assessment to improve student learning. John Wiley & Sons.
Dewaele, J.–M. (2018). Online questionnaires. In A. Phakiti, P. DeCosta, L. Plonsky, & S. Starfield (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of applied linguistics research methodology (pp. 269–286). Palgrave Macmillan.
Dörnyei, Z. (2020). Innovations and challenges in language learning motivation. Routledge.
Ellis, P. D. (2010). The essential guide to effect sizes: Statistical power, meta-analysis, and the interpretation of research results. Cambridge University Press.
Finnish National Agency for Education. (2020). Education services and the coronavirus.
https://www.oph.fi/en/news/2020/education-services-and-coronavirus
FNBE [National core curriculum for basic education 2014]. (2016a). Finnish National Board of Education, Publications.
FNBE [National core curriculum for general upper secondary schools 2015]. (2016b). Finnish National Board of Education, Publications.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, J. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.
Hattie, J., & Zierer, K. (2019). Visible learning insights. Routledge.
Hilli, C. (2020). Distance teaching in small rural primary schools: A participatory action research project. Educational Action Research, 28(1), 38–52.
Leibold, N., & Schwarz, L. M. (2015). The art of giving online feedback. The Journal of Effective Teaching, 15(1), 34–46.
Linnakylä, P., & Välijärvi, J. (2005). Arvon mekin ansaitsemme. Kansainvälinen arviointi suomalaisen koulun kehittämiseksi [Worthy of recognition? International assessment and the development of the Finnish School]. Ps-Kustannus.
Mackey, A., Park, H. I., & Tagarelli, K. M. (2016). Errors, corrective feedback and repair: variations and learning outcomes. In G. Hall (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of English language teaching (pp. 499–512). Routledge.
Mäkipää, T., & Ouakrim–Soivio, N. (2019). Perceptions of Finnish upper secondary school students of the assessment practices of their teachers. Journal of Teaching and Learning, 13(2), 23–42.
Niemi, H. M., & Kousa, P. (2020). A case study of students’ and teachers’ perceptions in a Finnish high school during the COVID pandemic. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 4(4), 352–369.
Niemi, H., Toom, A., & Kallioniemi, A. (Eds.) (2016). Miracle of education: The principles and practices of teaching and learning in Finnish schools (2nd Rev. Ed.). Sense Publishers.
OAJ [Trade Union of Teachers in Finland]. (2020). OAJ:n kysely koskien opetuksen poikkeusjärjestelyjä keväällä 2020. Tiivistelmä [Survey regarding the exceptional teaching arrangements in spring 2020. Summary] https://www.oaj.fi/ajankohtaista/uutiset-ja-tiedotteet/2020/koronavirus-kysely/
Pollari, P. (2020). “Mitä pitäisi kehittää ja miten?†Lukiolaisten kokemuksia arvioinnista ja sen menetelmistä englannin opinnoissa [â€What should be improved and how?†Students’ experiences of assessment and its methodology in their upper secondary English studiesâ€]. In R. Hildén & K. Hahl (Eds.), Kielididaktiikan katse tulevaisuuteen: haasteita, mahdollisuuksia ja uusia avauksia kielten opetukseen (pp. 153–171). Suomen ainedidaktisen tutkimusseuran julkaisuja, Ainedidaktisia tutkimuksia 17.
Purpura, J. E. (2016). Second and foreign language assessment. The Modern Language Journal, 100, 190–208.
Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Brookhart, S. M. (2018). Using feedback to improve learning. Routledge.
Simons, J., Leverett, S., & Beaumont, K. (2020). Success of distance learning graduates and the
role of intrinsic motivation. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 35(3), 277–293.
Simonson, M., & Seepersaud, D. J. (2019). Distance education: Definition and glossary of terms (4th Ed.). Information Age Publishing.
Statistics Finland. (2021). Education. https://www.stat.fi/til/kou_en.html
Stenman, S., & Pettersson, F. (2020). Remote teaching for equal and inclusive education in rural areas? An analysis of teachers’ perspectives on remote teaching. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 37(3), 87–98.
SUKOL (The Federation of Foreign Language Teachers in Finland). (2020).
https://www.sukol.fi/liitto/mika_sukol_on/other_languages
Tanhua–Piiroinen, E., Kaarakainen, S–S., Kaarakainen, M–T., & Viteli, J. (2020). Digiajan peruskoulu II [Comprehensive schools in the digital age II]. Publications of the Ministry of Education and Culture, Finland 2020.
Taras, M. (2005). Assessment – summative and formative - some theoretical reflections. British Journal of Educational Studies, 53(4), 466–478.
Toppin, I. N., & Toppin, S. M. (2016). Virtual schools: The changing landscape of K–12 education in the U.S. Education and Information Technologies, 21, 1571–1581.
Tsagari, D. (2016). Assessment orientations of state primary EFL teachers in two Mediterranean countries. CEPS Journal, 6(1), 9–30.
Vanhatalo, U., & Vehkalahti, K. (2020). Kysely [Questionnaire]. In M. Luodonpää–Manni, M. Hamunen, R. Konstenius, M. Miestamo, U. Nikanne, & K. Sinnemäki (Eds.), Kielentutkimuksen menetelmiä (pp. 240–273). SKS.
Venäläinen, S. (2020). Etäopetus ja tasa-arvo [Remote teaching and equality]. Tempus 5/2020, 12–13.
Vocational Education and Training Act. (531/2017). https://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/alkup/2017/20170531
Wisniewski, B., Zierer, K., & Hattie, J. (2020). The power of feedback revisited: A meta-analysis of educational feedback research. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1–14.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitted article, which will be published online in the Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal (for short: CEPS Journal) by University of Ljubljana Press (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education, Kardeljeva ploščad 16, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). The Author’s/Authors’ name(s) will be evident in the article in the journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in the hands of the publisher.
- The Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit themselves to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
