Teachers’ Perceptions of Assessment and Feedback Practices in Finland’s Foreign Language Classes During the Covid-19 Pandemic

  • Toni Mäkipää Faculty of Educational Sciences, University of Helsinki, Finland
  • Kaisa Hahl Faculty of Educational Sciences, University of Helsinki, Finland
  • Milla Luodonpää-Manni Faculty of Educational Sciences, University of Helsinki, Finland
Keywords: assessment, feedback, foreign language teaching and learning, remote teaching


In this paper, we examine how the Covid-19 pandemic affected the quality of teachers’ assessment and feedback in Finland’s foreign language classes during the remote teaching period in spring 2020. Multifaceted assessment and feedback practices are underscored in Finland’s core curricula, forming a focal aspect of learning. Therefore, we studied teachers’ perceptions of their assessment and feedback practices at different school levels during the remote teaching period and how they considered the remote teaching period in students’ final assessment at the end of basic education. Data were collected through an online questionnaire and analysed using both quantitative and qualitative methods. Most of the 176 respondents felt that assessment and feedback practices were implemented successfully, and the final assessment was realistic and reliable. However, teachers’ perceptions were mixed on several issues, and differences were found in the amount and form of feedback between respondents and school levels or what competence demonstration or assignments to count towards the final assessment. In addition, the remote teaching period usually had less influence on students’ final grades than the last few months of basic education. The results suggest that more attention should be paid to enhancing feedback practices and connecting with students during remote teaching periods.


Download data is not yet available.


Ahtiainen, R., Asikainen, M., Heikonen, L., Hienonen, N., Hotulainen, R., Lindfors, P., Lindgren, E., Lintuvuori, M., Oinas, S., Rimpelä, A., & Vainikainen, M–P. (2020). Koulunkäynti, opetus ja hyvinvointi kouluyhteisössä koronaepidemian aikana: Ensitulokset [Schoolgoing, teaching and well-being in school community during the corona pandemic: Initial results]. HEA, NEDIS, REAL.

Anderson, L. W. (2003). Classroom assessment: Enhancing the quality of teacher decision making. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

Butler, S. M., & McMunn, N. D. (2014). A teacher’s guide to classroom assessment: Understanding and using assessment to improve student learning. John Wiley & Sons.

Dewaele, J.–M. (2018). Online questionnaires. In A. Phakiti, P. DeCosta, L. Plonsky, & S. Starfield (Eds.), The Palgrave handbook of applied linguistics research methodology (pp. 269–286). Palgrave Macmillan.

Dörnyei, Z. (2020). Innovations and challenges in language learning motivation. Routledge.

Ellis, P. D. (2010). The essential guide to effect sizes: Statistical power, meta-analysis, and the interpretation of research results. Cambridge University Press.

Finnish National Agency for Education. (2020). Education services and the coronavirus.


FNBE [National core curriculum for basic education 2014]. (2016a). Finnish National Board of Education, Publications.

FNBE [National core curriculum for general upper secondary schools 2015]. (2016b). Finnish National Board of Education, Publications.

Hattie, J., & Timperley, J. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112.

Hattie, J., & Zierer, K. (2019). Visible learning insights. Routledge.

Hilli, C. (2020). Distance teaching in small rural primary schools: A participatory action research project. Educational Action Research, 28(1), 38–52.

Leibold, N., & Schwarz, L. M. (2015). The art of giving online feedback. The Journal of Effective Teaching, 15(1), 34–46.

Linnakylä, P., & Välijärvi, J. (2005). Arvon mekin ansaitsemme. Kansainvälinen arviointi suomalaisen koulun kehittämiseksi [Worthy of recognition? International assessment and the development of the Finnish School]. Ps-Kustannus.

Mackey, A., Park, H. I., & Tagarelli, K. M. (2016). Errors, corrective feedback and repair: variations and learning outcomes. In G. Hall (Ed.), The Routledge handbook of English language teaching (pp. 499–512). Routledge.

Mäkipää, T., & Ouakrim–Soivio, N. (2019). Perceptions of Finnish upper secondary school students of the assessment practices of their teachers. Journal of Teaching and Learning, 13(2), 23–42.

Niemi, H. M., & Kousa, P. (2020). A case study of students’ and teachers’ perceptions in a Finnish high school during the COVID pandemic. International Journal of Technology in Education and Science, 4(4), 352–369.

Niemi, H., Toom, A., & Kallioniemi, A. (Eds.) (2016). Miracle of education: The principles and practices of teaching and learning in Finnish schools (2nd Rev. Ed.). Sense Publishers.

OAJ [Trade Union of Teachers in Finland]. (2020). OAJ:n kysely koskien opetuksen poikkeusjärjestelyjä keväällä 2020. Tiivistelmä [Survey regarding the exceptional teaching arrangements in spring 2020. Summary] https://www.oaj.fi/ajankohtaista/uutiset-ja-tiedotteet/2020/koronavirus-kysely/

Pollari, P. (2020). “Mitä pitäisi kehittää ja miten?” Lukiolaisten kokemuksia arvioinnista ja sen menetelmistä englannin opinnoissa [”What should be improved and how?” Students’ experiences of assessment and its methodology in their upper secondary English studies”]. In R. Hildén & K. Hahl (Eds.), Kielididaktiikan katse tulevaisuuteen: haasteita, mahdollisuuksia ja uusia avauksia kielten opetukseen (pp. 153–171). Suomen ainedidaktisen tutkimusseuran julkaisuja, Ainedidaktisia tutkimuksia 17.

Purpura, J. E. (2016). Second and foreign language assessment. The Modern Language Journal, 100, 190–208.

Ruiz-Primo, M. A., & Brookhart, S. M. (2018). Using feedback to improve learning. Routledge.

Simons, J., Leverett, S., & Beaumont, K. (2020). Success of distance learning graduates and the

role of intrinsic motivation. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 35(3), 277–293.

Simonson, M., & Seepersaud, D. J. (2019). Distance education: Definition and glossary of terms (4th Ed.). Information Age Publishing.

Statistics Finland. (2021). Education. https://www.stat.fi/til/kou_en.html

Stenman, S., & Pettersson, F. (2020). Remote teaching for equal and inclusive education in rural areas? An analysis of teachers’ perspectives on remote teaching. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 37(3), 87–98.

SUKOL (The Federation of Foreign Language Teachers in Finland). (2020).


Tanhua–Piiroinen, E., Kaarakainen, S–S., Kaarakainen, M–T., & Viteli, J. (2020). Digiajan peruskoulu II [Comprehensive schools in the digital age II]. Publications of the Ministry of Education and Culture, Finland 2020.

Taras, M. (2005). Assessment – summative and formative - some theoretical reflections. British Journal of Educational Studies, 53(4), 466–478.

Toppin, I. N., & Toppin, S. M. (2016). Virtual schools: The changing landscape of K–12 education in the U.S. Education and Information Technologies, 21, 1571–1581.

Tsagari, D. (2016). Assessment orientations of state primary EFL teachers in two Mediterranean countries. CEPS Journal, 6(1), 9–30.

Vanhatalo, U., & Vehkalahti, K. (2020). Kysely [Questionnaire]. In M. Luodonpää–Manni, M. Hamunen, R. Konstenius, M. Miestamo, U. Nikanne, & K. Sinnemäki (Eds.), Kielentutkimuksen menetelmiä (pp. 240–273). SKS.

Venäläinen, S. (2020). Etäopetus ja tasa-arvo [Remote teaching and equality]. Tempus 5/2020, 12–13.

Vocational Education and Training Act. (531/2017). https://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/alkup/2017/20170531

Wisniewski, B., Zierer, K., & Hattie, J. (2020). The power of feedback revisited: A meta-analysis of educational feedback research. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 1–14.