The Opinion of Slovene (Mother Tongue) Teachers on Distance Learning in Primary Schools

  • Tomaž Petek Faculty of Education, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia
Keywords: Slovene language, distance teaching, empowerment, advantages, disadvantages

Abstract

The Slovene language has several roles in the educational process in the Republic of Slovenia, including its role as a subject in the curriculum in its own right. It is a basic general education subject in public primary schools and has the most hours of all of the subjects. All teachers were forced to teach remotely for the first time in the history of education (first during the 2019/20 school year and then in the 2020/21 school year) during the Covid-19 coronavirus pandemic. The results of a survey comprising 348 teachers with the ability to teach the mother tongue at primary school level (grades 1–9 of primary school; 59% were class curriculum teachers and 41% were Slovene language teachers) show, among other things, that teachers mostly have a good attitude towards distance teaching and feel empowered for this type of teaching, although they feel that this method makes them mentally and physically more tired than teaching in the class-room. Among the advantages of distance teaching, teachers mention the greater use of modern information and communication technology, more use of e-material and the opportunity for formal monitoring of students. In their opinion, the biggest problems of distance teaching (of the Slo-vene language) include: lack of student participation; lack of non-verbal communication, thus creating difficulties in understanding; and technical issues. Most teachers believe that students acquire less knowledge or far less knowledge by distance education than they would from education in the classroom. Teachers who feel more empowered to teach remotely also have a better attitude towards teaching their mother tongue and are more satisfied with the communication aspect with students in distant teaching. Teachers who have received the necessary training for distance teaching as part of their work feel more empowered to teach this way than teachers who have not had such training.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barbour, M. K. (2019). The landscape of K-12 online learning: Examining what is known. https://www. Researchgate.net/3302275960

Bregar, I., Zagmajster, M., & Radovan, M. (2020). E-izobraževanje za digitalno družbo [E-learning for the digital society]. Andragoški center Slovenije.

Godec SorÅ¡ak, L. (2019). Pomen povratne informacije bodoÄim uÄiteljem o njihovih govornih nastopih [The importance of feedback to future teachers about their speaking performances]. In H. Tivadar (Ed.), Slovenski javni govor in jezikovno-kulturna (samo)zavest [(Obdobja, 38) (pp. 465–472). University Press, Faculty of Arts.

KavÄnik Kolar, V. (2020). Pouk slovenÅ¡Äine na daljavo v osnovni Å¡oli /.../ [Distance teaching of Slovene in primary school /… /]. SlovenÅ¡Äina v Å¡oli, 3(XXIII), 57–62.

KrapÅ¡e, T., Rupnik Vec, T., ÄŒop, J., Jerman, O., Likon, B., Majkus, D., Stadler, L., StrmÅ¡ek, A., VuliÄ, I., & Zule, E. (2019). Profesionalno uÄenje in delovanje uÄiteljev [Professional learning and working of teachers]. Å ola za ravnatalje.

Kustec, S., Logaj, V., Krek, M., Flogie, A., Truden Dobrin, P., & IvanuÅ¡ Grmek, M. (2020). Vzgoja in izobraževanje v Republiki Sloveniji v razmerah, povezanih s COVID-19 [Education in the Republic of Slovenia in conditions related to Covid-19]. Modeli in priporoÄila. Ministry of Education, Science and Sport and the Institute of the Republic of Slovenia for Education.

Maher, D. (2014). Online learning in primary schools. https://researchgate.net/publication/296342009

Means, B., Toyama, Y., Murphy, R. Bakia, M., & Jones, K. (2010). Evaluation of evidence-based practices online learning: A meta-analysis and review of online learning studies. US Department of Education.

Paniagua, A., & Istance, D. (2018). Teachers as designers of learning environments: The importance of innovative pedagogies. OECD.

Petek, T. (2013). Vloga in položaj slovenÅ¡Äine v vzgojno-izobraževalnem procesu [The role and position of Slovene in the educational process]. PedagoÅ¡ka obzorja, 28(1), 32–48.

Plut Pregelj, L. (2004). KonstruktivistiÄne teorije znanja in Å¡olska reforma: uÄitelj v vlogi uÄenca [Constructivist theories of knowledge and school reform: The teacher in the role of the student]. In B. MarentiÄ Požarnik (Ed.), Konstruktivizem v Å¡oli in izobraževanje uÄiteljev (pp. 17–41). Center za pedagoÅ¡ko izobraževanje Filozofske fakultete.

Pravilnik o izobrazbi uÄiteljev in drugih strokovnih delavcev v izobraževalnem programu osnovne Å¡ole [Rules on the level of education of teachers and other professionals in educational programmes of primary schools] (2011). Uradni list RS, Å¡t. 109/11, 10/12, 92/12, 49/13 in 75/15.

Primary school programme. Mathematics. Curriculum [Program osnovna Å¡ola. Matematika. UÄni naÄrt]. (2011). Ministry for Education and Sport: The National Education Institute of the Republic of Slovenia.

Primary school programme. Slovene language. Curriculum [Program osnovna Å¡ola. SlovenÅ¡Äina. UÄni naÄrt]. (2018). Ministry for Education and Sport: The National Education Institute of the Republic of Slovenia.

Rihter, J., & PotoÄnik, R. (2020). Preservice teachers’ beliefs about teaching pupils with special educational needs in visual art education, European Journal of Special Needs Education, 36(1).

Rot Vrhovec, A. (2015). Forms of cooperative learning in language teaching in Slovenian language classes at the primary school level. CEPS Journal, 5(3), 129–156.

Rot Vrhovec, A. (2020). PouÄevanje uÄencev, katerih prvi jezik ni slovenski [The education of students whose first language is not Slovene]. PedagoÅ¡ka fakulteta UL.

Rupnik Vec, T., Preskar, S., Slivar, B., Zupanc Grom, R. Kregar, S., Holcar Brunauer, A., Bevc, V., Mithans, M., Grmek, M., & Musek LeÅ¡nik, K. (2020). Analiza izobraževanja na daljavo v Äasu epidemije COVID-19 v Sloveniji [Analysis of distance education during the Covid-19 epidemic in Slovenia]. National Education Institute of the Republic of Slovenia.

Saksida, I. (2008). Poti in razpotja didaktike književnosti [Paths and crossroads of literature didactics]. Izolit Publishing House.

StrmÄnik, F. (2001). Didaktika. Osrednje teoretiÄne teme [Didactics. Central theoretical topics]. Scientific Institute of the Faculty of Arts.

Tomlinson, C. A. (2008). The goals of differentiation. Educational leadership, 66(3), 26–30.

ValenÄiÄ Zuljan, M., & BlanuÅ¡a TroÅ¡elj, D. (2014). Profesionalni razvoj vzgojiteljev z vidika vzgojiteljevih pojmovanj. [Professional development of educators from the point of view of educators’ concepts]. AndragoÅ¡ka spoznanja, 20(1), 43–60.

ValenÄiÄ Zuljan, M., & Kalin, J. (2020). UÄne metode in razvoj uÄiteljeve metodiÄne kompetence [Teaching methods and the development of the teacher’s methodological competence]. Faculty of Education, University of Ljubljana.

Vogel, J. (2015). Modeli jezikovnega pouka pri predmetu slovenÅ¡Äina od leta 1990 do danes [Models of language teaching in the subject Slovene from 1990 to the present] Jezik in slovstvo 60(3–4), 173–183. National Education Institute of the Republic of Slovenia. www.zrss.si.

ZASSS – Association of working groups of the Parents’ Councils of Slovenia [Zveza aktivov svetov staršev Slovenije – ZASSS]. (2020). Izobraževanje na daljavo in pogled naprej. Ministry of Education, Science and Sport. http://www.zasss.si/index.html

Published
2021-10-15
How to Cite
Petek, T. (2021). The Opinion of Slovene (Mother Tongue) Teachers on Distance Learning in Primary Schools. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 11(Sp.Issue), 383–406. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.1139