Zero Tolerance vs Restorative Justice in the United States
Abstract
As schools across the United States begin to move away from the harsh Zero Tolerance policies that characterised the better part of the previous three decades, there is an opportunity to change the focus of school discipline. Frequently, school discipline policies are centred on punitive approaches that separate students from their peers. Rather than meeting the needs of these students, schools alienate them from their peers, teachers, and school communities. The goal of the education system is to provide children and adolescents with a quality education that will allow them to grow into productive and participating members of society. Zero Tolerance and school discipline policies were created to protect students, but, in practice, these policies have proven to be harmful and have unintended consequences. Too often, punitive disciplinary action in the school setting puts students on a pathway that leads into the juvenile or criminal justice system. Although the Zero Tolerance policy is a federal initiative, many states are beginning to realise the harmful impacts this policy has on students, especially marginalised students. As a result, states are beginning to pass legislation that veers away from Zero Tolerance, focusing more on alternatives like restorative practices. This article will explore these issues and share information on policies current states are using and the implications of these policies on students, as well as the school-to-prison pipeline.
Downloads
References
Bender, K., Ferguson, K., Thompson, S., Komlo, C., & Pollio, D. (2010). Factors associated with trauma and posttraumatic stress disorder among homeless youth in three U.S. cities: The importance of transience. Journal of Traumatic Stress, 23(1), 161–168. https://doi.org/10.1002/jts.20501
Brown, M. A., & Di Lallo, S. (2020). Talking circles: A culturally responsive evaluation practice. American Journal of Evaluation, 41(3), 367–383. https://doi.org/10.1177/1098214019899164
Duffy, H. (n.d.). (2018). Predictors of school discipline. Predictors of school discipline, 6(4). Houston Education Research Consortium (HERC). Rice University. https://herc.rice.edu/research/predictors-school-discipline
Gun-Free School Act of 1994. (2019, September 9). Office of Elementary and Secondary Education. https://oese.ed.gov/offices/office-of-formula-grants/the-elementary-and-secondary-education-act-the-no-child-left-behind-act-of-2001/subpart-3-gun-possession/
Guo, W. (2020). Dismantling the school-to-prison pipeline. Harvard Model Congress.
Hemez, P., Brent, J. J., & Mowen, T. J. (2019). Exploring the school-to-prison pipeline: How school suspensions influence incarceration during young adulthood. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice, 18(3), 235–255. https://doi.org/10.1177/1541204019880945
Jones, K. (2013). #zerotolerance #keepingupwiththetimes: How federal zero tolerance policies failed to promote educational success, deter juvenile legal consequences, and confront new social media concerns in public schools. Journal of Law & Education, 42(4), 739–750.
Kang-Brown, J., Trone, J., Fratello, J., & Daftary-Kapur, T. (2013). (rep.). A generation later: What we’ve learned about zero tolerance in schools. Vera Institute of Justice. https://www.vera.org/publications/a-generation-later-what-weve-learned-about-zero-tolerance-in-schools
Kohli, R., Montaño, E., & Fisher, D. (2019). History matters: Challenging an a-historical approach to restorative justice in teacher education. Theory into Practice, 58(4), 377–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405841.2019.1626613
Loomis, A. M. (2020). Pathways from family violence exposure to disruptive behavior and suspension in elementary school. Journal of Family Trauma, Child Custody & Child Development, 17(1), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/26904586.2020.1734516
Martin, V. (2020, October 11). The school-to-prison pipeline: When is a suspension not just a suspension? When it's part of a nationwide pattern leading to racial disparities and prison. Birmingham Watch. https://birminghamwatch.org/school-prison-pipeline-suspension-not-just-suspension-part-nationwide-pattern-leading-racial-disparities-prison/
Maya Angelou quotes to live by: Literary ladies guide. Literary ladies guide. https://www.literaryladiesguide.com/author-quotes/maya-angelou-quotes-live/
Minnesota Department of Education. (2019). Restorative practices school implementation guidance.
Mitchell, S. D. (2014). Zero tolerance policies: Criminalizing childhood and disenfranchising the next generation of citizens. Social Sciences Research Network, 92(2) https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2458550
Office of Civil Rights. Civil Rights Data Collection. (n.d.). https://ocrdata.ed.gov/estimations/2017-2018.
Pew Research Center. (2014). Religion in America: U.S. religious data, demographics and statistics. https://www.pewforum.org/religious-landscape-study/compare/political-ideology/by/state/
Reynolds, C. R., Skiba, R. J., Graham, S., Conoley, J. C., & Garcia-Vazquez, E. (2008). Are zero tolerance policies effective in the schools? An evidentiary review and recommendations. American Psychologist, 63(9), 852–862. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.63.9.852
School Discipline Laws & Regulations by State. National Center on Safe Supportive Learning Environments. (2020). https://safesupportivelearning.ed.gov/school-discipline-laws-regulations-state.
Wadhwa, A. (2017). Restorative justice in urban schools: Disrupting the school-to-prison pipeline. Routledge, an imprint of the Taylor & Francis Group.
Welsh, R. O., & Little, S. (2018). Caste and control in schools: A systematic review of the pathways, rates and correlates of exclusion due to school discipline. Children and Youth Services Review, 94, 315–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2018.09.031
White, R. E., & Young, D. C. (2020). The social injustice of zero-tolerance discipline. In Handbook on promoting social justice in education (pp. 2471–2485). Springer International Publishing.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitted article, which will be published online in the Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal (for short: CEPS Journal) by University of Ljubljana Press (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education, Kardeljeva ploščad 16, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). The Author’s/Authors’ name(s) will be evident in the article in the journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in the hands of the publisher.
- The Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit themselves to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
