Evolution in the Spanish Primary Education Autonomic Curricula and Textbooks. A Geographic Analysis

Keywords: primary education, autonomic curricula, progression, evolution model, textbooks

Abstract

Evolution by natural selection is a theory that constitutes a powerful paradigm capable of conveying the teaching-learning of multiple concepts in biology. However, it has been controversial from its formulation to the present, which also affects education. For instance, while some of the basic curricula of primary education in Europe are arranged around the concepts that are considered necessary for structuring the scientific model of evolution (i.e., Sweden), other curricula do not contemplate such concepts. The last is the case of the basic curriculum of primary education in Spain. However, in Spain, on the basis of such a curriculum, there are 17 different primary education curricula corresponding to each of the autonomous communities of the state. The objective of this work is to state a detailed geographical picture of the presence of the concepts necessary to articulate the model of evolution through the analysis of the autonomic curricula of Spain. With such an aim, words that represent such concepts (evolution, inheritance, selection, adaptation and biodiversity, etc.) have been searched for in the natural sciences and social sciences areas of the autonomous curricula of primary education. Furthermore, a search for such evolution-related concepts has also been performed in the activities of eighteen Spanish primary education textbooks on natural and social science subjects. For this purpose, two aspects were considered: characterisation and scientific skills. Both the autonomous curricula of primary education and the textbooks hold important gaps when addressing evolution. The texts include activities that prioritise basic cognitive skills over the more demanding ones associated with scientific competence.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alonso, D. M., Fernández-Río, J., Giménez, A. M., & Sabori, J. A. P. (2015). Análisis de los currículos autonómicos LOMCE de Educación Física en Educación Primaria [Analysis of the regional LOMCE curricula for physical education in primary education]. Retos. Nuevas Tendencias en Educación Física, Deporte y Recreación, 28, 15–20. https://recyt.fecyt.es/index.php/retos/article/view/34822/19057

Alters, B., & Nelson, C. (2002). Perspective: teaching evolution in higher education. Evolution, 56(10), 1891–1901. https://www.jstor.org/stable/3094632

Blanco-López, Ã., España-Ramos, E., & Franco-Mariscal, A. J. (2017). Estrategias didácticas para el desarrollo del pensamiento crítico en el aula de ciencias [Didactic strategies for the development of critical thinking in the science classroom]. Ãpice, 1(1), 107–115. https://ruc.udc.es/dspace/bitstream/handle/2183/19977/Apice_2017_1_1_art._7.pdf

Brem, S. K., Ranney, M., & Schindel, J. (2003). Perceived consequences of evolution: College students perceive negative personal and social impact in evolutionary theory. Science Education, 87(2), 181–206. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.10105

Bybee, R. W. (2012). The next generation of science standards: Implications for biology education. The American Biology Teacher, 74(8), 542–549. https://doi.org/10.1525/abt.2012.74.8.3

Caixeta de Castro Lima, M. E., & De Souza Silva, P. (2010). Critérios que professores de química apontam como orientadores da escolha do livro didático [Criteria that chemistry teachers apply as counselors of the choice of didactic books]. Ensaio – Pesquisa Educação em Ciências, 12(2), 121–135. https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-21172010120208

De Pro Bueno, A. J. (2013). Enseñar procedimientos: por qué y para qué [Teaching procedures: why and what for]. Alambique: Didáctica de las ciencias experimentales, 73, 69–76.

Del Carmen, L. M., & Jiménez, P. (2010). Los libros de texto: un recurso flexible [Textbooks: a flexible resource]. Alambique: Didáctica de las ciencias experimentales, 66, 48–55.

Demastes, S., Settlage, J., & Good, R. (1995). Students' conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution: Cases of replication and comparison. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(5), 535–550. https://doi.org/10.1002/TEA.3660320509

Deniz, H., & Borgerding, L. A. (2018). Evolution Education around the Globe. Springer.

Eurydice (2022). Organización y Administración general del Sistema Educativo [Organization and general administration of the educational system]. https://eacea.ec.europa.eu/national-policies/eurydice/content/organisation-and-governance-79_es

Garcia Barros, S. G., Losada, C. M., & Rivadulla López, J. R. (2021). Actividades de textos escolares. Su contribución al desarrollo de la competencia científica [School textbook activities. Their contribution to the development of scientific competence]. Enseñanza de las Ciencias. Revista de investigación y experiencias didácticas, 39(1), 219–238. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.3099

Gilbert, J. K. (2004). Models and modelling: Routes to more authentic science education. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 2(2), 115–130. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-004-3186-4

Hidalgo Herrera, M. (2014). ¿Han evolucionado los libros de texto? Análisis comparativo del Medioevo en manuales escolares del siglo XX y XXI [Have textbooks evolved? Comparative analysis of the Middle Ages in school textbooks of the 20th and 21st centuries]. CLIO. History and History teaching, 40. http://clio.rediris.es/n40/articulos/Hidalgo2014.pdf

Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., & Crujeiras, B. (2017). Epistemic Practices and Scientific Practices in Science Education. In K. S. Taber, B. Akpan (Eds.), Science education. New directions in mathematics and science education (pp. 69–80). SensePublishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-749-8_5

Kaushik, A., & Naithani, S. (2016). A comprehensive study of text mining approach. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 16(2), 69.

KovaÄ, M., & Kepic Mohar, A. (2022). The changing role of textbooks in primary education in the digital era: What can we learn from reading research? CEPS Journal, 12(2), 11–28. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.1290

López Hernández, A. (2007). Libros de texto y profesionalidad docente [Textbooks and teaching professionalism]. Avances En Supervisión Educativa 6, 1–13. https://redined.educacion.gob.es/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11162/170178/282-Texto%20del%20art%c3%adculo-312-1-10-20160309.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y

Lupión-Cobos, T., López-Castilla, R., & Blanco-López, Ã. (2017). What do science teachers think about developing scientific competences through context-based teaching? A case study. International Journal of Science Education, 39(7), 937–963. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1310412.

Marco-Bujosa, L. M., & Levy, A. J. (2016) Caught in the balance: An organizational analysis of science teaching in schools with elementary science specialists. Science Education, 100(6), 983–1008. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21239

Martínez Losada, C., & García Barros, S. (2003). Las actividades de primaria y ESO incluidas en libros escolares. ¿Qué objetivo persiguen? ¿Qué procedimientos enseñan? [Primary and secondary education activities included in school books. What goal are they pursuing? What procedures do they teach?]. Enseñanza de las Ciencias, 21(2), 243–264. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/ensciencias.3929

Molina Puche, S., & Alfaro Romero, A. (2019). Ventajas e inconvenientes del uso del libro de texto en las aulas de Educación Primaria. Percepciones y experiencias de docentes de la Región de Murcia [Advantages and disadvantages of the use of the textbook in the classrooms of primary education. Perceptions and experiences of teachers in the Region of Murcia]. Revista Electrónica Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 22(2), 179–197. https://doi.org/10.6018/reifop.22.2.332021

Monereo Font, C. (2010). ¡Saquen el libro de texto! Resistencia, obstáculos y alternativas en la formación de los docentes para el cambio educativo [Get out the textbook! Resistance, obstacles and alternatives in teacher training for educational change]. Revista de educación, 352, 583–597.

NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science Standards: For states, by states. The National Academies Press. http://www.nextgenscience.org/

National Science Teaching Association (NSTA), 2013. Position statement: The Teaching of Evolution. https://www.nsta.org/nstas-official-positions/teaching-evolution

Nehm, R., & Schonfeld, I. (2007). Does increasing biology teacher knowledge of evolution and the nature of science lead to greater preference for the teaching of evolution in schools? Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18(5), 699–723. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-007-9062-7

Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). (2019). PISA 2018 Science Framework, in PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/f30da688-en

Organic Law 8/2013 of December the 9th for the Quality of Education. Boletín Oficial del Estado, 295, de 10 de diciembre de 2013, 97858–97921. https://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2013/12/10/pdfs/BOE-A-2013-12886.pdf

Organic Law 3/2020 of December the 29th on Education. Boletín Oficial del Estado, 340, de 30 de diciembre de 2020, 122868–122953. https://www.boe.es/boe/dias/2020/12/30/pdfs/BOE-A-2020-17264.pdf

Ortuzar-Iragorri, A., & Díez-López, J. D. (2021). El suelo en el currículum de Educación Primaria española. Un análisis geográfico [The soil in the Spanish Primary Education curriculum. A geographic analysis]. In Universidad de Córdoba: Asociación Española de Profesores e Investigadores de Didáctica de las Ciencias Experimentales (Eds.), 29 Encuentros de Didáctica de las Ciencias Experimentales y 5ª Escuelas de Doctorado: 10, 11 y 12 de Febrero 2021 (pp. 1209–1216). Symposium conducted at the meeting of Universidad de Córdoba and APICE, Córdoba.

Osborne, J. (2014). Teaching scientific practices: Meeting the challenge of change. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 25(2), 177–196. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-014-9384-1

Pavešić, B. P., & Cankar, G. (2022). Textbooks and students’ knowledge. CEPS Journal, 12(2), 29–65. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.1283

Sá-Pinto, X., Realdon, G., Torkar, G., Sousa, B., Georgiou, M., Jeffries, A., Korfiatis K., Paolucci S., Pessoa P., Rocha J., Stasinakis P.K., Cavadas B., Crottini A., Gnidovec T, Nogueira T., Papadopoulou P., Piccoli C., Barstad J., Dufour H.D., Pejchinovska M., Pobric A., Cvetković D & Mavrikaki, E. (2021). Development and validation of a framework for the assessment of school curricula on the presence of evolutionary concepts (FACE). Evolution: Education and Outreach, 14(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-021-00142-2

Sadler, T. D. (2005). Evolutionary theory as a guide to socioscientific decision making. Journal of Biological Education, 39(2), 68–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2005.9655964

Sideri, A., & Skoumios, M. (2021). Science process skills in the Greek primary school science textbooks. Science Education International 32(3), 231–236. https://doi.org/10.33828/sei.v32.i3.6

Smith, M. (2010). Current status of research in teaching and learning evolution: II. Pedagogical issues. Science and Education, 19(6), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-009-9215-5

Vázquez-Ben, L., & Bugallo-Rodríguez, Ã. (2018). El modelo de evolución biológica en el curriculum de Educación Primaria: Un análisis comparativo a nivel internacional [The biological evolution model in the Primary Education curriculum: A comparative analysis at an international level]. Revista Eureka sobre Enseñanza y Divulgación de las Ciencias, 15(3), 3101–3101.

Working Group on Teaching Evolution (WGTE). (1998). Teaching about evolution and the nature of science. National Academy Press.

Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering students’ knowledge and argumentation skills through dilemmas in human genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 39(1), 35–62. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10008

Published
2023-03-31
How to Cite
Mª Arritokieta, O.-I., & Zamalloa, T. (2023). Evolution in the Spanish Primary Education Autonomic Curricula and Textbooks. A Geographic Analysis. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 13(1), 143-161. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.1487