The Real and the Virtual in the Spatial Perception of Education Students

  • Bea Tomšič Amon Faculty of Education, University of Ljubljana, Slovenia
Keywords: multisensory experience, pedagogical strategies, real space, urban space perception, virtual space

Abstract

The article presents an investigation conducted with education students at the Faculty of Education, University of Ljubljana. The aim was to determine whether the perception and image of urban space have changed over the years, as the same questionnaire was used in 2001 and 2019. The students had to choose which of the eleven questions contained in the questionnaire they wanted to answer in order to describe their favourite place in the city. Questions that were not significant to them were left unanswered. Here we present a comparison between the results from 2001 and 2019, analysed quantitatively and qualitatively. Despite the fact that spatial perception involves all of the senses, it was the sense of touch, as opposed to vision, that was mentioned the least in both cases. Our original assumption was that with the advance of digital media, perception of real space would be more concise. However, there were a number of students in 2019 who expressed themselves more accurately than those in 2001, suggesting that students have developed a greater sensitivity towards space. The general findings suggest that we should rethink the pedagogical process and some suggestions are presented in the conclusion.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Banaei, M., Hatami, J., Yazdanfar, A., & Gramann, K. (2017). Walking through architectural spaces: The impact of interior forms on human brain dynamics. Frontiers in Human neuroscience, 11, 360–373.

Bello, H. (2020). Internet de los sentidos: Qué es y cómo cambiará nuestra vida [Internet of the senses: What it is and how it will change our life], IEBS Press. https://www.iebschool.com/blog/internet-de-los-sentidos-tecnologia

Bintari, B. (2018). Spatial perception strategy in orientation design: How the environment creates harmony between human made and nature to help people to orientate. Duta Wacana Christian University, Yakarta, Indonesia. https://www.irbnet.de/daten/iconda/CIB_DC22871.pdf

Blesser, B., & Salter, L. R. (2007). Spaces speak, are you listening? Experiencing aural architecture. The MIT Press.

Coelho, C. (2015). The living experience as a design content: From concept to appropriation. Ambiances 1, 1–19. Direction Générale des Patrimoines – DAPA.

Crary, J. (2001). Suspensions of perception – attention, spectacle, and modern culture. The MIT Press.

Cullen, G. (2006). The concise townscape. Elsevier.

Devetak, I. (2011). Visualization in education. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 1(4), 5–9.

Devetak, I., & Krek, J. (2013). Sustainable development in education (editorial). Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 3(1), 5–8.

Dewey, J. (1980). Art as experience. Perigee Books.

Franchak, J. M. (2020). Looking with the head and eyes. In J. B. Wagman, & J. C. Blau (Eds.), Perception as information detection, reflections on Gibson's ecological approach to visual perception (pp. 205–220). Routledge.

Grau, O. (2003). Virtual art. From illusion to immersion. The MIT Press.

Grosz, E. (2001). Architecture from the outside, essays on virtual and real space. The MIT Press.

Hoelzl, I. (2021). Image-transaction, what you see is not what you get. In O. Grau, & I. Hinterwaldner (Eds.), Retracing political dimensions, strategies in contemporary new media art (pp. 19–32). Walter De Gruyter GmbH.

Lynch, K. (1990). The image of the city (2nd ed.). The MIT Press.

Mitrache, A. (2013). Spatial sensibility in architectural education. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93, 544–548.

Pallasmaa, J. (2011). The embodied image. Imagination and imagery in architecture. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Pérez-Martínez, A. (2020). La revolución sensorial de la tecnología [The sensorial revolution of technology]. Universidad del Pacífico, Lima, Perú. https://www.bbvaopenmind.com/tecnologia/futuro/la-revolucion-sensorial-de-la-tecnologia

Rocha, T. (2017). Spatial perception and architecture. https://www.tomasrochavision.com/percepcion-visual/2017

Rossi, A. (1984). The architecture of the city. The MIT Press.

Sagadin, J. (1997). Poglavja iz metodologije pedagoškega raziskovanja [Chapters from pedagogical research methodology]. Educational Research Institute, University of Ljubljana.

Skaza, M. (2019). Architecture as a consequence of perception. IOP conference series: Materials science and engineering, 471(2), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/471/2/022033

Tomšič Čerkez, B. (2015). Teaching and learning through art. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 5(3), 5–9.

Tomšič Čerkez, B., & Zupančič, D. (2011). Physical space and the process of education. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 1(2), 5–9.

Tschumi, B. (2001). Architecture and disjunction. The MIT Press.

Tschumi, B. & Cheng, I. (2003). The state of architecture at the beginning of the 21st century. The Monacelli Press, Inc.

Vidler, A. (2001). Warped space – art, architecture, and anxiety in modern culture. The MIT Press.

Ware, C. (2004). Information, visualization, perception for design. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers.

Published
2025-03-25
How to Cite
Tomšič Amon, B. (2025). The Real and the Virtual in the Spatial Perception of Education Students. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 15(1), 225–243. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.1522