Learning to Teach in Out-of-University and Out-of-School Environments in Primary Teacher Education in Estonia, Finland, and Sweden
Abstract
Learning in diverse settings during pre-service teacher training equips future primary teachers with the knowledge and skills to teach in authentic learning environments later in their work lives. This experience helps to meet the varying needs of their future students who have increasingly diverse cultural and socio-economic backgrounds with varying levels of access to learning and knowledge. During their university studies, pre-service teachers need to recognise the value of out-of-school environments, reinforce awareness in practice, and reflect on experiences to deepen pedagogical thinking about learning environments. This multiple case study describes the common practices in the pre-service training of primary teachers at Tallinn University, University of Helsinki and Uppsala University concerning teaching in out-of-classroom learning environments. Our aim was to explore the ways that the three universities support pre-service primary teachers in using out-ofschool learning environments in their future practice. We intended to identify practices regarding our respective national curricula and university courses for pre-service primary teachers. We have three main suggestions for teacher educators regarding learning to teach in diverse environments: enable meaningful and reflective practical tasks in out of university learning environments for pre-service teachers; ensure the sustainability of external partnerships by stating collaborative practices in course programmes while leaving flexibility in the details; and reflect on professional networking across the boundaries of institutions.
Downloads
References
Akkerman, S. F., & Bakker, A. (2011). Boundary crossing and boundary objects. Review of Educational Research, 81(2), 132–169. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654311404435
Allas, R., Leijen, Ä., & Toom, A. (2020). Guided reflection procedure as a method to facilitate student teachers’ perception of their teaching to support the construction of practical knowledge. Teachers and Teaching, 26(2), 166–192. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2020.1758053
Almqvist Nielsen, L. (2023). Prehistoric history in Swedish primary school education: pupils’ expression of empathy after visiting a cultural heritage site. Education, 3-13, 53(3), 378–392. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004279.2023.2191631
Arık, S. (2022). Anxiety levels of science teachers about organizing trips to out-of-school learning environments. International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 14(3), 2887–2914. https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4496-8104
Avraamidou, L. (2015). Reconceptualizing Elementary Teacher Preparation: A case for informal science education. International Journal of Science Education, 37(1), 108–135. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.969358
Behar-Horenstein, L. S. (2018). Curriculum. In B. B. Frey (Ed.), The SAGE Encyclopedia of Educational Research, Measurement, and Evaluation (p. 445). SAGE publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506326139
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706QP063OA
Britzman, D. P. (2006). Teacher education as uneven development: Toward a psychology of uncertainty. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 10(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/13603120600934079
Coddington, N. E. (2020). “Putting it in Technicolor:” The influence of a pre-service teaching residency at a historic site, archive, library, or museum on in-service pedagogical practices. Journal of Social Studies Research, 44(2), 219–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jssr.2020.01.003
Curriculum for the compulsory school, preschool class and school-age educare (Lgr11). (2018). Swedish National Agency for Education. https://www.skolverket.se/publikationsserier/styrdokument/2018/curriculum-for-the-compulsoryschool-preschool-class-and-school-age-educare-revised-2018
DeWitt, J., & Storksdieck, M. (2008). A short review of school field trips: Key findings from the past and implications for the future. Visitor Studies, 11(2), 181–197. https://doi.org/10.1080/10645570802355562
Domenici, V. (2022). STEAM Project-Based Learning Activities at the Science Museum as an Effective Training for Future Chemistry Teachers. Education Sciences, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12010030
Erss, M., Lauristin, M., Loogma, K., Sarv, E.-S., & Sirp, L. (2021). The Second COVID-19 Spring from the Perspectives of Students, Teachers and Parents: The Follow-up Study of Estonian Distance Learning by Estonian Education Forum. Eesti Haridusfoorum. https://haridusfoorum.ee/
Estonian National Curriculum for Basic Schools. (2011). Riigi Teataja [State Gazette of the Republic of Estonia]. https://www.riigiteataja.ee/en/eli/ee/VV/reg/524092014014/consolide
European Commission: Directorate-General for Research and Innovation. (2015). Science education for responsible citizenship: Report to the European Commission of the expert group on science education. Publications Office. https://doi.org/10.2777/12626
Feldmann, H. (2018). Still influential: The protestant emphasis on schooling. Comparative Sociology, 17(5), 641–678. https://doi.org/10.1163/15691330-12341474
Greene, J. P., Kisida, B., & Bowen, D. H. (2014). Value of Field Trips. Education Next, Winter, 78–86. http://educationnext.org/supplemental-study-long-term-benefits-of-field-trips-to-the-walton-artscenter/%5Cnhttp://educationnext.org/files/ednext_XIV_1_greene.pdf
Hamilton, E. R., & Margot, K. C. (2020). Learning to Teach in a Museum: Benefits of a Museum-University Partnership. Journal of Museum Education, 45(4), 462–475. https://doi.org/10.1080/10598650.2020.1807242
Heikkilä, E. (2022). Sustainability through a Phenomenon-based learning approach: A study of student reflections [Master’s thesis, University of Helsinki]. https://blogs.helsinki.fi/sveasusproject/files/2022/04/Heikkila%CC%88_Emma_MastersThesis_2022.pdf
Henriksson, A. C. (2018). Primary school teachers’ perceptions of out of school learning within science education. LUMAT, 6(2), 9–26. https://doi.org/10.31129/LUMAT.6.2.313
Huisman, S., & Edwards, A. (2011). Experiential learning: An exploration of situated and service learning. AILACTE Journal, 8(1), 15–35.
Jarvis, P. (1999). The Practicioner-Researcher. Developing theory from practice. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
Kahn, L. G., Lindstrom, L., & Murray, C. (2014). Factors contributing to preservice teachers’ beliefs about diversity. Teacher Education Quarterly, 41(4), 53–70.
Kangas, M. (2010). Finnish children’s views on the ideal school and learning environment. Learning Environments Research, 13(3), 205–223. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-010-9075-6
Kansanen, P. (1991). Pedagogical Thinking: The Basic Problem of Teacher Education. European Journal of Education, 26(3), 251–260.
Kansanen, P. (2003). Teacher Education in Finland: Current Models and New Developments. In B. Moon, L. Vlasceanu, & L. C. Barrows (Eds.), Studies on Higher Education Institutional Approaches to Teacher Education within Higher Education in Europe: Current Models and New Developments (pp. 85–108). UNESCO.
Kelly, A. V. (2009). The Curriculum: Theory and Practice (6th ed.). SAGE Publications Limited.
Kink, K. (2013). Klassiõpetajate arusaamad õppekäigu olemusest, olulisusest, efektiivsusest ning õpetaja rollist õppekäigu protsessis [How Classroom Teachers Understand the Essence of Field Trip, its Importance, Efficiency And See Their Role During the Process] [Master’s thesis, University of Tartu].
Kisiel, J. F. (2005). Understanding elementary teacher motivations for science fieldtrips. Science Education, 89(6), 936–955. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20085
Kisiel, J. F. (2013). Introducing Future Teachers to Science Beyond the Classroom. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 24(1), 67–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10972-012-9288-x
Klettenberg, H.-M. (2022). Kooli asukoha seos muuseumitundide külastamise sagedusega õppeaastatel 2014/2015 – 2019/2020 Eesti Meremuuseumi näitel [The connection between school location and frequency of taking part in museum learning activities in the school years 2014/2015 - 2019/2020 in Estonian Maritime Museum] [Master thesis, Tallinn University].
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning. Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge University Press. http://www.cambridge.org/de/academic/subjects/psychology/developmentalpsychology/situated-learning-legitimate-peripheral-participation
Maloney, B., & Hill, M. D. (2016). Museums and Universities: Partnerships with Lasting Impact. Journal of Museum Education, 41(4), 247–249. https://doi.org/10.1080/10598650.2016.1235814
Morentin, M., & Guisasola, J. (2015). The Role of Science Museum Field Trips in the Primary Teacher Preparation. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(5), 965–990. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9522-4
Nabors, M. L., Edwards, L. C., & Murray, R. K. (2009). Making the Case for Field Trips: What Research Tells Us and What Site Coordinators Have To Say. Education, 129(4), 661–668. http://web.a.ebscohost.com.ezproxy.tlu.ee/ehost/pdfviewer/pdfv
Näkk, A.-M., & Timoštšuk, I. (2021). In pursuit of primary teachers’ work motivation amid increased external neoliberal pressure in education. Teacher Development, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2021.1899040
National core curriculum for basic education. (2014). Finnish National Agency for Education.
Novljan, M., & Pavlin, J. (2022). Experiences of Slovenian In-Service Primary School Teachers and Students of Grades 4 and 5 with Outdoor Lessons in the Subject Science and Technology. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 12(1), 189–215. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.919
Paris, S. G., Yambor, K. M., & Packard, B. W. L. (1998). Hands-On Biology: A Museum-School-University Partnership for Enhancing Students’ Interest and Learning in Science. Elementary School Journal, 98(3). https://doi.org/10.1086/461894
Ruus, V.-R., & Timoštšuk, I. (2014). Searching for Constant Innovation in Teacher Education Curricula: the Case of Estonia. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 62(November), 97–108.
Sala, A., Punie, Y., Garkov, V., & Cabrera, M. (2020). LifeComp. The European Framework for Personal, Social and Learning to Learn Key Competence. European Comission. https://doi.org/10.2760/302967
Schmidinger, H., Molin, L., & Brandt, S. A. (2014). Excursions in school-past and present from Swedish and Anglo-Saxon perspectives. European Journal of Geography 5(4), 87–101. https://www.edu.uu.se/
Schön, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. Jossey-Bass.
Seligmann, T. (2014). Learning museum: A meeting place for pre-service teachers and museums. Journal of Museum Education, 39(1), 42–53. https://doi.org/10.1080/10598650.2014.11510794
Slabina, P., & Aava, K. (2019). Õpetajate koostöise õpikultuuri kogemused Eesti üldhariduskoolide näitel. Eesti Haridusteaduste Ajakiri. Estonian Journal of Education, 7(1), 76–100. https://doi.org/10.12697/eha.2019.7.1.04
Stetson, R., & Stroud, N. D. (2014). Pre-service teacher training at the museum school. Journal of Museum Education, 39(1), 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1080/10598650.2014.11510796
Šarić, M., & Šteh, B. (2017). Critical Reflection in the Professional Development of Teachers: Challenges and Possibilities. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 7(3), 67–85. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.288
Tasdemir, A., Kartal, T., & Ozdemir, A. M. (2014). Using Science Centers and Museums for Teacher Training in Turkey. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 23(1), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-013-0085-x
Timoštšuk, I., & Ugaste, A. (2010). Student teachers’ professional identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(8), 1563–1570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.06.008
Timoštšuk, I., & Ugaste, A. (2012). The role of emotions in student teachers’ professional identity. European Journal of Teacher Education, 35(4), 421–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2012.662637
Tire, G. (2021). Estonia: A Positive PISA Experience. In N. Crato (Ed.), Improving a Country’s Education. PISA 2018 results in 10 countries. (pp. 101–120). Springer.
Tyack, D., & Tobin, W. (1994). The “Grammar” of Schooling: Why Has it Been so Hard to Change? American Educational Research Journal Fall, 31(3), 453–479. https://about.jstor.org/terms
Uppin, H., & Timoštšuk, I. (2019). “We’ll Be Back by Christmas” – Developing Historical Empathy During a Museum Activity. Journal of Museum Education, 44(3), 310–324. https://doi.org/10.1080/10598650.2019.1612660
Uppin, H., & Timoštšuk, I. (2022). Teaching in a natural history museum: What can we learn from Estonian elementary school teachers?. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 17, 1159–1192. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-022-10138-z
Vesterinen, O., Kangas, M., Krokfors, L., Kopisto, K., & Salo, L. (2017). Inter-professional pedagogical collaboration between teachers and their out-of-school partners. Educational Studies, 43(2), 231–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2016.1277131
Volmari, K. (Ed.). (2019). BASIC EDUCATION IN THE NORDIC REGION – Similar values, different policies. Finnish National Agency for Education. https://www.oph.fi/en/statistics-and-publications/publications/basic-education-nordic-region-similar-values-different
Wolff, L.-A., & Ehrström, P. (2020). Social sustainability and transformation in higher educational settings: A utopia or possibility? Sustainability, 12(10), 4176. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12104176
Wolff, L.-A., Vivitsou, M., & Aarbakke, K. (2022). SveaSus: Sustainable World Heritage learning through a phenomenon-based approach. In P. Grenni & S. Gašperović (Eds.), Phoenix Cost Action CA19123 - Protection, Resilience, Rehabilitation of Damaged Environment, Proceedings of the 2022 Rome Meeting – Rome, 19–22 January 2022 (pp. 90–92). Water Research institute, National Research Council of Italy.
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case Study Research - Design and Methods. Applied Social Research Methods Series (4th ed., volume 5). SAGE Publications, Inc.
Yıldırım, G., & Akamca, G. Ö. (2017). The effect of outdoor learning activities on the development of preschool children. South African Journal of Education, 37(2), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.15700/saje.v37n2a1378
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitted article, which will be published online in the Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal (for short: CEPS Journal) by University of Ljubljana Press (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education, Kardeljeva ploščad 16, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). The Author’s/Authors’ name(s) will be evident in the article in the journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in the hands of the publisher.
- The Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit themselves to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.