Between Academia and School: Habitus Reflexivity as One Way of Dealing with the Theory-Practice Tension in Teacher Education
Abstract
Teacher education’s primary goal is to train prospective teachers, which differs from study programmes, such as philosophy or mathematics, that do not cater to defined professions. This traditional understanding of the teaching profession becomes apparent when students ask: ‘How is this content, topic, method, task, or question relevant to school work?’ It is also reflected in the inclusion of practical school training in teacher education curricula. In Austria’s teacher training, these practical elements are accompanied by theoretical and methodological teaching foundations. However, students often question the applicability of theoretical knowledge to the teaching profession, which creates tension between the academic and pedagogical orientations. This paper discusses these very theory-practice tensions in teacher education based on findings from the project Habitus.Power.Education, which involved student teachers at an Austrian university. We argue that teacher training at universities is neither merely a place for producing a future workforce nor a self-growth space without purpose. Teacher training, rather, combines both (sometimes ambivalent) elements: education in its broadest sense and professional training. Using our empirical material, we show that the theory-praxis gap manifests in the tension between academic and pedagogical orientation. To address and mediate this tension, we propose the concept of habitus reflexivity. Promoting such a form of reflexivity among students makes it possible to bridge the gap between the different logics of university and school. Furthermore, it helps to comprehend inequality and power imbalances in the education system and develop agency, which is essential for navigating the ever-changing and complex world of modern schools.
Downloads
References
Agud, I., & Ion, G. (2019). Problem-based learning in initial teacher education in Catalonia. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 9(2), 99–118. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.564
Bagnoli, A. (2009). Beyond the standard interview: The use of graphic elicitation and arts-based methods. Qualitative Research, 9(5), 547–570.
Bergold, J., & Thomas, S. (2010). Partizipative Forschung [Participatory Research]. In G. Mey & K. Mruck (Eds.), Handbuch Qualitative Forschung in der Psychologie [Handbook Qualitative Research in Psychology] (pp. 333–344). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794109343625
BMBWF (2021). Quality Framework for Schools. https://qms.at/images/quality_framework_for_schools.pdf
Bock, M. (1992). Das halbstrukturierte-leitfadenorientierte Tiefeninterview [The semi-structured, guideline-oriented in-depth interview]. In J. H. P. Hoffmeyer-Zlotnik (Ed.), Analyse verbaler Daten. Über den Umgang mit qualitativen Daten [Analysis of verbal data. About the handling of qualitative data] (pp. 90–109). Westdeutscher Verlag.
Bohnsack, R., Przyborski, A., & Schäffer, B. (Eds.). (2006). Das Gruppendiskussionsverfahren in der Forschungspraxis [The group discussion procedure in research practice]. Barbara Budrich Verlag.
Bollnow, O. (1978). Theorie und Praxis in der Lehrerbildung [Theory and practice in teacher education]. In H. Blankertz (Ed.), Die Theorie-Praxis-Diskussion in der Erziehungswissenschaft [The theory-practice discussion in educational science] (pp. 155–164). Beltz Juventa.
Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge University Press.
Bourdieu, P. (1983). Ökonomisches Kapital, kulturelles Kapital, soziales Kapital [Forms of Capital]. In R. Kreckel (Ed.), Soziale Ungleichheiten [Social inequality] (pp. 183–198). Soziale Welt Sonderband 2. Schwartz Verlag.
Bourdieu, P. (1997). Die männliche Herrschaft [Masculine Domination]. In I. Dölling (Ed.), Ein alltägliches Spiel [An everyday game] (pp. 153–217). Suhrkamp Verlag.
Bourdieu, P. (2001). Wie die Kultur zum Bauern kommt. Ãœber Bildung Schule und Politik [How culture comes to the farmer. About education, school and politics]. Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag.
Bourdieu, P., & Passeron, J. C. (1971). Die Illusion der Chancengleichheit [The Inheritors: French Students and Their Relations to Culture]. Klett Verlag.
Buschi, C., & Hedderich, I. (2021). How to involve young children in a Photovoice project: Experiences and results [56 paragraphs]. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 22(1), Article 14. https://doi.org/10.17169/fqs-22.1.3457
Cramer, C. (2014). Theorie und Praxis in der Lehrerbildung: Bestimmung des Verhältnisses durch Synthese von theoretischen Zugängen, empirischen Befunden und Realisierungsformen [Theory and practice in teacher education: Determining the relationship through synthesis of theoretical approaches, empirical findings and forms of realisation]. DDS – Die Deutsche Schule, 106(4), 344–357.
Darbyshire, P., MacDougall, C., & Schiller, W. (2005). Multiple methods in qualitative research with children: More insight or just more? Qualitative Research, 5(4), 417–436. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794105056921
Demirović, A. (2015). Wissenschaft oder Dummheit? Über die Zerstörung der Rationalität in den Bildungsinstitutionen [Science or stupidity? On the destruction of rationality in educational institutions]. VSA Verlag.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2005). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. Sage Publications Ltd.
Drerup, H., & Terhart, E. (1990). Erkenntnis und Gestaltung – Vom Nutzen erziehungswissenschaftlicher Forschung in praktischen Verwendungskontexten [Knowledge and Design - On the Usefulness of Educational Research in Contexts of Practical Application]. Deutscher Studien Verlag.
El-Mafaalani, A. (2012). BildungsaufsteigerInnen aus benachteiligten Milieus: Habitustransformation und soziale Mobilität bei Einheimischen und Türkeistämmigen [Educational advancement from disadvantaged backgrounds: habitus transformation and social mobility among natives and people of Turkish origin]. VS Springer.
Ermenc, K. S., Vujisić, N. Ž., & Spasenović, V. (2015). Theory, practice and competences in the study of pedagogy–views of Ljubljana and Belgrade university teachers. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 5(2), 35–55. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.141
Farley, L. A., Brooks, K., & Pope, K. (2017). Engaging Students in Praxis Using Photovoice Research. Multicultural Education, 24(2), 49-52.
Flick, U., von Kardorff, E., & Steinke, I. (2015). Qualitative Forschung, Ein Handbuch [Qualitative research. A Handbook]. Rowohlt.
Frisch, A. (w. d.). Photovoice. Photovoice-Berlin. https://photovoice-berlin.de
Hark, S., & Hofbauer, J. (Eds.). (2018). Vermessene Räume, gespannte Beziehungen. Unternehmerische Universitäten und Geschlechterdynamiken [Measured Spaces, Tense Relationships. Entrepreneurial Universities and Gender Dynamics]. Suhrkamp.
Härtel, P., Greiner, U., Hopmann, S., Jorzik, B., Krainz-Dürr, M., Mettinger, A., Polaschek, M., Schratz, M., Stoll, M., & Stadelmann, W. (2010). LehrerInnenbildung NEU. Die Zukunft der pädagogischen Berufe. Die Empfehlungen der Expert Innengruppe [Teacher Education NEW. The Future of the Pedagogical Professions. The recommendations of the expert group]. https://www.qsr.or.at/dokumente/1870-20140529-092820Empfehlungen_der_ExpertInnengruppe_Endbericht_092010_2_Auflage.pdf
Haug, F. (1999a). Memory-work as a method of social science research: A detailed rendering of memorywork method. http://www.friggahaug.inkrit.de/documents/memoryworkresearchguidei7.pdf
Haug, F. (1999b). Vorlesungen zur Einführung in die Erinnerungsarbeit [Lectures on the introduction to memory work]. Argument Verlag.
Helsper, W (2016). Lehrerprofessionalität der strukturtheoretische Ansatz [Teacher professionalism the structural theoretical approach]. In M. Rothland (Ed.), Beruf Lehrer/Lehrerin. Ein Studienbuch [Profession teacher. A study book] (pp. 103–125). Waxmann utb.
Huber, L. (2014). Forschungsbasiertes, Forschungsorientiertes, Forschendes Lernen: Alles dasselbe? Ein Plädoyer für eine Verständigung über Begriffe und Unterscheidungen im Feld forschungsnahen Lehrens und Lernens [Research-based, research-oriented, research-based learning: all the same? A plea for an understanding of terms and distinctions in the field of research-based teaching and learning]. Das Hochschulwesen (HSW), 62(1+2), 22–29.
Kergel, D., & Heidkamp, B. (2019). Abenteuer Lehre - Vorbemerkung anstatt eines Vorwortes [Adventure Teaching - Preface instead of a Foreword.]. In W. Meseth & B. Heidkamp (Eds.), Praxishandbuch Habitussensibilität und Diversität in der Hochschullehre [Practice Handbook Habit Sensitivity and Diversity in University Teaching] (pp. V–VIII). Springer VS.
Korthagen, F. (2010). The relationship between theory and practice in teacher education. International encyclopedia of education, 7, 669–675.
Lewin, K. (1951). Problems of Research in Social Psychology. In D. Cartwright (Eds.), Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers (pp. 155–169). Harper & Row.
Makrinus, L. (2012). Der Wunsch nach mehr Praxis: Zur Bedeutung von Praxisphasen im Lehramtsstudium [The desire for more practice: on the importance of practical phases in teacher training programmes]. VS Springer.
Meseth, W. (2016). Kasuistik in der Lehrerbildung zwischen disziplinbezogenem Forschungs- und professionsbezogenem Orientierungswissen [Casuistry in teacher education between disciplinerelated research and profession-related orientation knowledge]. In M. Hummrich, A. Hebenstreit, M. Hinrichsen, & M. Meier (Eds.), Was ist der Fall? [What is the case?] (pp. 39–60). VS Springer.
Meseth, W., & Proske, M. (2018). Das Wissen der Lehrerbildung zwischen Wissenschafts- und Praxisorientierung [The knowledge of teacher education between science and practice orientation]. In J. Böhme, C. Cramer, & C. Bressler (Eds.), Erziehungswissenschaft und Lehrerbildung im Widerstreit!? Verhältnisbestimmungen, Herausforderungen und Perspektiven [Educational science and teacher education in conflict!? Relationships, challenges and perspectives] (pp. 19–43). Klinkhardt.
Moldaschl, M. (2010). Was ist Reflexivität? [What is reflexivity?] (No. 11/2010). Papers and Preprints of the Department of Innovation Research and Sustainable Resource Management. https://www.tuchemnitz.de/wirtschaft/bwl9/forschung/fprojekte/reflex/kompReflex/ergebnisse/pdf/WP_2010_11_Reflexivitaet.pdf
Niemi, H. (2011). Educating student teachers to become high quality professionals–A Finnish case. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 1(1), 43–66. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.440
Oevermann, U. (1996). Theoretische Skizze einer revidierten Theorie professionalisierten Handelns [Theoretical sketch of a revised theory of professionalised action]. In A. Combe & W. Helsper (Eds.), Pädagogische Professionalität. Untersuchungen zum Typus pädagogischen Handelns [Pedagogical Professionalism. Studies on the type of pedagogical action] (pp. 70–182). Suhrkamp.
Ortner, R., & Thuswald, M. (2012). In Differenzen schreiben. Kollektive Erinnerungsarbeit zu pädagogischen Situationen [Writing in differences. Collective memory work on pedagogical situations]. In R. Ortner (Ed.), Exploring Differences. Zur Vermittlung von Forschung und Bildung in pädagogischer Praxis [Exploring Differences. On the mediation of research and education in pedagogical practice] (pp. 65–81). Löcker.
Pongratz, L. A. (2010). Sackgassen der Bildung. Pädagogik anders denken [Dead ends in education. Thinking pedagogy differently]. W. Kohlhammer.
Rothland, M. (2020). Legenden der Lehrerbildung. Zur Diskussion einheitsstiftender Vermittlung von „Theorie“ und „Praxis“ im Studium [Legends of Teacher Education. On the discussion of the unifying mediation of ‘theory’ and ‘practice’ in the study programme]. Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 66(2), 270–287. https://doi.org/10.1007/s35834-022-00373-3
Scheid, C., & Wenzl, T. (Eds.). (2020). Wieviel Wissenschaft braucht die Lehrerbildung? [How much science does teacher education need?]. VS Springer.
Schmitt, L. (2006). Symbolische Gewalt und Habitus-Struktur-Konflikte: Entwurf einer Heuristik zur Analyse und Bearbeitung von Konflikten [Symbolic Violence and Habitus-Structure Conflicts: Drafting a Heuristic for the Analysis and Management of Conflicts]. (CCS Working Papers, 2). Universität Marburg.
Schmitt, L. (2015). Studentische Sozioanalysen und Habitus-Struktur-Reflexivität als Methode der Bottom-Up-Sensibilisierung von Lehrenden und Studierenden [Student socio-analyses and habitus-structure reflexivity as a method of bottom-up sensitisation of teachers and students]. In K. Rheinländer (Ed.), Ungleichheitssensible Hochschullehre. Positionen, Voraussetzungen, Perspektiven [Inequality-sensitive university teaching. Positions, Prerequisites, Perspectives] (pp. 197–217). Springer.
Schratz, M., Paseka, A., & Schrittesser, I. (2010). Professionstheoretische Grundlagen und thematische Annäherung [Professional theoretical foundations and thematic approach]. In M. Schratz, A. Paseka, & I. Schrittesser (Eds.), Pädagogische Professionalität: quer denken – umdenken – neu denken. Impulse für next practice im Lehrerberuf [Pedagogical professionalism: think laterally - rethink - think anew. Impulses for next practice in the teaching profession] (pp. 9–47). Facultas Verlag.
Steinke, I. (2004). Quality criteria in qualitative research. In U. Flick, E. v. Kardorff, & I. Steinke (Eds.), A companion to qualitative research (pp. 184–90). Sage Publications.
Unidata, 2023. Gender Monitoring (Studien, Universitäten, Ordentliche Studien). https://unidata.gv.at/
Universität Graz (ed.). ZAHLEN, FAKTEN, ANALYSEN. Chancengleichheit an der Uni Graz[FACTS, FIGURES, ANALYSES. Equal opportunities at the University of Graz]. https://static.unigraz.at/fileadmin/Koordination-Gender/Gleichstellung/Zahlen_Fakten_2022_webdatei.pdf
Unger, H. (2014): Partizipative Forschung: Einführung in die Forschungspraxis [Participatory Research: Introduction to Research Practice]. VS Springer.
Vogel, D. (2019). Habitusreflexive Beratung im Kontext von Schule. Ein Weg zu mehr Bildungsgerechtigkeit [Habitus-reflexive counselling in the context of schools. A path to more educational justice]. VS Springer.
Weniger, E. (1957 [1929]). Theorie und Praxis in der Erziehung [Theory and practice in education]. In E. Weniger (Ed.), Die Eigenständigkeit der Erziehung in Theorie und Praxis. Probleme der akademischen Lehrerbildung [The autonomy of education in theory and practice. Problems of academic teacher education] (pp. 7–22). Beltz Verlag.
Winker, G., & Degele N. (2009). Intersektionalität. Zur Analyse sozialer Ungleichheiten [Intersectionality. On the analysis of social inequalities]. Transcript Verlag.
Winker, G., & Degele, N. (2011). Intersectionality as multi-level analysis: Dealing with social inequality. European Journal of Women’s Studies, 18(1), 51–66.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitted article, which will be published online in the Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal (for short: CEPS Journal) by University of Ljubljana Press (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education, Kardeljeva ploščad 16, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). The Author’s/Authors’ name(s) will be evident in the article in the journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in the hands of the publisher.
- The Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit themselves to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
