The Study of Light as an Experimental Factor in Observing the Development of Children’s Artistic Abilities in Kindergarten
Abstract
Playing with light and shadow is an inexhaustible stimulus for preschool children to develop divergent thinking and artistic expression. Creativity develops through artistic expression, and the experience enriches and matures thematically through the more conscious use of artistic language. The aim of the experimental study was to measure the level of artistic development in children aged five and six years. The level of creative, optical-thematic and artistic development was observed. In the study, two different programmes with implemented activities (experimental factors) were planned and compared with a control group. The first programme (experimental factor EP1) was described as modern and adapted to the children’s interests and incentives, while the second programme (experimental factor EP2) was prepared in advance and called traditional. A total of 161 children aged five and six years took part in the study. In order to measure the level of general artistic development, test drawings were made at the beginning and end of the experiment. These were analysed by a team of experts according to the aforementioned developmental aspects. The results of the experimental group with the traditional approach showed a statistically significantly higher performance in monitoring creative development than the control group. Within the two experimental programmes, the children in the EP1 programme achieved statistically better results in the aspect of creative development than the children in the EP2 programme. The results show that a well-designed programme for playing with light and shadow can have a positive effect on children’s artistic development.
Downloads
References
Besemer, S. P. (1998). Creative product analysis matrix: Testing the model structure and a comparison among products – Three novel chairs. Creativity Research Journal, 11(4), 333-346. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1104_7
Botella, M., Zenasni, F., & Lubart, T. (2018). What are the stages of the creative process? What visual art students are saying. Frontiers in Psychology, 21(9), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02266
Ceppi, G., & Zini, M. (2001). Bambini, spazi, relazioni. Metaprogetto di ambiente per l’infanzia [Children, spaces, relationships. An environmental meta-project for childhood]. Reggio Children srl.
Chan, D. W., & Zhao, Y. (2010). The relationship between drawing skill and artistic creativity: Do age and artistic involvement make a difference? Creativity Research Journal, 22(1), 27-36. https://doi.org/10.1080/1040041090357952
DeYoung, C. G. (2006). Higher-order factors of the Big Five in a multi-informant sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(6), 1138–1151. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.6.1138
Duh, M. (1996). Kompjutor u razvoju likovne kreativnosti kod učenika osnovne škole [The computer in the development of artistic creativity among primary school students] [Master’s thesis, Pedagoški fakultet Rijeka, Croatia].
Duh, M. (1997). Likovna ustvarjalnost z računalniškimi orodji v slovenski osnovni šoli [Artistic creativity with computer tools in a Slovenian primary school]. Sodobna pedagogika, 48(9/10), 509-526.
Duh, M. (2004). Vrednotenje kot didaktični problem pri likovni vzgoji [Evaluation as a didactic problem in art education]. Pedagoška fakulteta Maribor.
Duh, M. (2016). Art appreciation for developing communication skills among preschool children. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 6(1), 71-94. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1128996.pdf
Duh, M., & Büdefeld, A. (2018). Gender difference in the linear relationship among factors of drawing-related creativity in second-grade primary school students. Nova prisutnost, 16(2), 351-367. https://doi.org/10.31192/np.16.2.9
Duh, M., Herzog, J., & Lazar, M. (2016). Nivo likovno-kreativnog razvoja u različitim programima osnovnoškolskog obrazovanja [The level of artistic and creative development in different primary school education programmes]. Školski vjesnik: časopis za pedagogijsku teoriju i praksu, 65, 49-62. https://hrcak.srce.hr/160075
Grgurić, N. & Jakubin, M. (1996). Vizualno - likovni odgoj i obrazovanje [Visual art education]. Educa.
Herzog, J. (2008). Porazdelitev likovno ustvarjalnih sposobnosti med osnovnošolci [The distribution of artistic creative abilities among primary school students]. Revija za elementarno izobraževanje, 1(3/4), 87-94. http://rei.pef.um.si/images/Izdaje_revije/2008/Let_01_st_3_4_revija.pdf
Herzog, J. (2009). Dejavniki likovne ustvarjalnosti in likovno pedagoško delo [Factors of artistic creativity and artistic pedagogical work]. Revija za elementarno izobraževanje, 2(2/3), 19-31. https://journals.um.si/index.php/education/article/view/240
Herzog, J. (2018). Monitoring the artistic development of fourth-year students – An analysis of the situation in Croatian primary school. Croatian Journal of Education, 20(3), 973-1000. https://doi.org/10.15516/cje.v20i3.3041
Herzog, J., Lopert, N., & Duh, M. (2017). Examining the level of correlations between the factors of artistic creativity in pupils of Slovenian primary schools. Innovative Issues and Approaches in Social Sciences, 10(3), 21-36. https://doi.org/10.12959/issn.1855-0541.IIASS-2017-no3-art2
Huzjak, M., & Županić Benić, M. (2017). Measuring creativity in visual arts teaching methodology in elementary school. Croatian Journal of Education, 19(3), 43-59. https://doi.org/10.15516/cje.v19i0.2716
Jakubin, M. (1989). Osnove likovnog jezika i likovne tehnike: Priručnik za likovnu kulturu. [The basics of artistic language and art techniques: handbook for art culture]. Institut za pedagogijska istraživanja Filozofskog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Zagrebu.
Kadum, S. (2019). Divergentno mišljenje u procesu suvremenog odgoja i obrazovanja [Divergent thinking in the process of modern upbringing and education]. Metodički ogledi, 26(1), 81-98. https://hrcak.srce.hr/file/322443
Kandinsky, W. (2001). Punto, linea, superficie [Point, line, surface]. Adelphi Edizioni.
Karlavaris, B. (1974). Metodika nastave likovnog vaspitanja, Udžbenik za V. razred pedagoške akademije [Art education teaching methodology: Textbook for the 5th grade of the pedagogical academy]. Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva.
Karlavaris, B. (1991). Metodika likovnog odgoja 2 [Art education methodology 2]. Hofbauer p.o.
Karlavaris, B., & Kraguljac, M. (1981). Razvijanje kreativnosti putem likovnog vaspitanja u osnovnoj školi [Developing creativity through art education in primary school]. Prosveta.
Kim, K. H. (2006). Can we trust creativity tests? A review of the Torrance tests of creative thinking (TTCT). Creativity Research Journal, 18, 3-14. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1801_2
Lemons, G. (2011). Diverse perspectives of creativity testing controversial issues when used for inclusion into gifted programs. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 34(5), 742-772. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162353211417221
Licul, N. (2020). Teachers’ views on the use of photography in teaching arts in Croatian primary schools. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 10(4), 187-205. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.909
Malaguzzi, L. (2010). L’ombra e’ il pallottoliere del bambino [The shadow is the child’s abacus]. In S. Sturloni & V. Vecchi (Eds), Tutto ha un ombra, meno le formiche (pp. 24-30). Reggio Children srl, Reggio Children.
Merlin, U. (2023). Program istraživanja svjetlosti i njegov utjecaj na likovno izražavanje djece od pet i šest godina [A light research programme and its influence on the artistic expression of children aged five and six]. Tematski zbornik Unaprijeđenje kvalitete života djece i mladih: Tematski zbornik, 185-197.
Pelowski, M., Leder, H. & Tinio, P. L. (2017). Creativity in the visual arts. In J. C. Kaufman, V. P. Glaveanu & J. Baer (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of creativity across domains (pp. 80–109). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316274385.006
Petrač, L. (2015). Dijete i likovno djelo - Metodički pristupi likovno - umjetničkom djelu s djecom vrtićke i školske dobi [The child and the work of art – Methodical approaches to the work of art with children of kindergarten and school age]. Alfa d.d.
Rogers, C. R. (1954). Towards a theory of creativity. In P. E. Vernon (1970), Creativity: Selected readings. Penguin Books Ltd. Middlesex.
Sawyers, J. K., & Canestaro, N. C. (1989). Creativity and achievement in design coursework. Creativity Research Journal, 2(1-2), 126–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400418909534306
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3–15). Cambridge University Press.
Tanay, E. R. (1989). Likovna kultura u nižim razredima osnovne škole. Priručnik za nastavnike [Art in the lower grades of primary school. A handbook for teachers]. Školska knjiga.
Tomljenović, Z. (2015). An interactive approach to learning and teaching in visual arts education. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 5(3), 73-93. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.129
Uljanić, K. (1999). Projekt Svjetlost [Project Light]. Dijete, vrtić, obitelj: Časopis za odgoj i naobrazbu predškolske djece namijenjen stručnjacima i roditeljima, 5(18-19), 31-33. Pučko otvoreno učilište Korak po korak.
Vuk, S., Tacol, T., & Vogrinc, J. (2015). Adoption of the creative process according to the immersive method. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 5(3), 1189-1218.
Zupančič, T. (2017). Art and artist in kindergarten – Assumptions and examples. Acta Academiae Artium Vilnensis, 84, 35-51. https://leidykla.vda.lt/Files/file/Acta_84/02_T_Zupancic_Acta_84_35_51_p.pdf
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitted article, which will be published online in the Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal (for short: CEPS Journal) by University of Ljubljana Press (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education, Kardeljeva ploščad 16, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). The Author’s/Authors’ name(s) will be evident in the article in the journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in the hands of the publisher.
- The Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit themselves to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
