Teachers’ Metaphors and Beliefs about Teaching and their Relationship with Job Satisfaction
Abstract
This research focuses on Estonian teachers’ beliefs about teaching, the metaphors of their knowledge base, and the emotions connected with being a teacher. The relationships between these aspects and teacher job satisfaction were explored. In total, 658 mathematics, English language, biology, and class teachers participated in the research. The research applied a mostly quantitative design involving a mixed methods approach. The results highlight the complexity of teachers’ understanding of their role. Statistically significant differences were found between the teacher groups participating in the study. The results showed that the affective connotations of metaphors teachers attach to their work are related to teachers’ job satisfaction. However, there were no significant differences between teacher groups based on the nature of their metaphor and their beliefs about teaching. However, the results indicate that teachers expressing student-centred beliefs were more satisfied with their job environment than those with teacher-centred beliefs. The study suggests the importance of considering beliefs, knowledge base, and emotions in understanding job satisfaction.
Downloads
References
Alger, C. L. (2009). Secondary teachers’ conceptual metaphors of teaching and learning: changes over the career span. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25(1), 743–751. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2008.10.004
Andrews, H. A. (2011). Supporting quality teaching with recognition. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36(12), 59–70. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2011v36n12.5
Bakkenes, I., Vermunt, J. D., & Wubbels, T. (2010). Teacher learning in the context of educational innovation: Learning activities and learning outcomes of experienced teachers. Learning and Instruction, 20(6), 533–548. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.09.001
Beijaard, D., Verloop, N., & Vermunt, J. D. (2000). Teachers’ perceptions of professional identity: an exploratory study from a personal knowledge perspective. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(7), 749–764. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00023-8
Björk, L., Stengård, J., Söderberg, M., Andersson, E., & Wastensson, G. (2019). Beginning teachers’ work satisfaction, self-efficacy and willingness to stay in the profession: a question of job demandsresources balance?. Teachers and Teaching, 25(8), 955–971. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2019.1688288
Bullough, R. V., Jr. (1991). Exploring personal teaching metaphors in preservice teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 42, 43–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248719104200107
Burić, I., & Moè, A. (2020). What makes teachers enthusiastic: The interplay of positive affect, selfefficacy and job satisfaction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 89, Article 103008. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.103008
Cabalin, C., & Andrada, P. (2023). Framing teacher identity in an era of accountability: Media and teachers’ narratives in Chile. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 31(85). https://doi.org/10.14507/epaa.31.7616
Calderhead, J. (1996). Teachers: beliefs and knowledge. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology (pp. 709–725). McMillan.
Caleon, I. S., Tan, Y. S. M., & Cho, Y. H. (2018). Does teaching experience matter? The beliefs and practices of beginning and experienced physics teachers. Research in Science Education, 48(1), 117– 149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9562-6
Cansiz, M., & Cansiz, N. (2019). How do sources of self-efficacy predict pre-service teachers’ beliefs related to constructivist and traditional approaches to teaching and learning? SAGE Open, 9(4), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.11 77/2158244019885125
Centre for Ethics, University of Tartu and the Estonian Research Council. (2017). Estonian Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. Centre for Ethics, University of Tartu.
Chaaban, Y., & Du, X. (2017). Novice teachers’ job satisfaction and coping strategies: Overcoming contextual challenges at Qatari government schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 340–350. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.07.002
Chen, J. (2019). Exploring the impact of teacher emotions on their approaches to teaching: A structural equation modelling approach. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(1), 57–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12220
Cross, D. I., & Hong, J. Y. (2012). An ecological examination of teachers’ emotions in the school context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 28(7), 957–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2012.05.001
Day, C., Kington, A., Stobart, G., & Sammons, P. (2006). The personal and professional selves of teachers: stable and unstable identities. British Educational Research Journal, 32(4), 601–616. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920600775316
Dreer, B. (2024). Teachers’ well-being and job satisfaction: the important role of positive emotions in the workplace. Educational Studies, 50(1), 61–77. http://doi.org/10.1080/03055698.2021.1940872
Hannula, M. S., Lepik, M., Pipere, A., & Tuohilampi, L. (2013, February 6–19). Mathematics teachers’ beliefs in Estonia, Latvia and Finland [Paper presentation]. Eighth Congress of European Research in Mathematics Education (CERME 8), Antalya, Turkey. https://researchportal.helsinki.fi/en/publications/mathematics-teachers-beliefs-in-estonia-latviaand-finland
Hannula, M. S., Pipere, A., Lepik, M., & Kislenko, K. (2013). Mathematics teachers’ beliefs and schools’ micro-culture as predictors of constructivist practices in Estonia, Latvia and Finland. In A. M. Lindmeier & A. Heinze (Eds.), Proceedings of the 37th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Volume 2 (pp. 433–440). IPN Leibniz-Institut für die Pädagogik der Naturwissenschaften und Matematik an der Universität Kiel.
Henno, I. (2015). Loodusteaduse õppimisest ja õpetamisest Eesti koolides rahvusvaheliste võrdlusuuringute taustal [Science learning and teaching in Estonian schools in light of international comparative studies] [Doctoral dissertation, Tallinn University, Estonia].
Joram, E., & Gabriele, A. J. (1998). Preservice teachers’ prior beliefs: transforming obstacles into opportunities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.1177/003368829903000201
Judge, T. A., Thoresen, C. J. Bono, J. E., & Patton, G. K. (2001). The job satisfaction-job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review. Psychological Bulletin, 127(3), 376–407. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.3.376
Kember, D., & Kwan. K.- P. (2000). Lecturers’ approaches to teaching and their relationship to conceptions of good teaching. Instructional Science, 28(5/6), 469–490. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026569608656
Klassen, R. M., & Chiu, M. M. (2011). The occupational commitment and intention to quit of practicing and pre-service teachers: Influence of self-efficacy, job stress, and teaching context. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(2), 114–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.01.002
Klusmann, U., Kunter, M., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., & Baumert, J. (2008). Teachers’ occupational well-being and quality of instruction: The important role of self-regulatory patterns. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(3), Article 702. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.702
Korthagen, A. J. (2004). In search of the essence of a good teacher: towards a more holistic approach in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20(1), 77–97.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2003.10.002
Kyriacou, C. (2001). Teacher stress: directions for future research. Educational Review, 53(1), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131910120033628
Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press.
Lam, B. H., & Kember, D. (2006). The relationship between conceptions of teaching and approaches to teaching. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 12(6), 693–713. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600601029744
Leavy, A. M., McSorley, F. A., & Bote, L. A. (2007). An examination of what metaphor construction reveals about the evolution of preservice teachers’ beliefs about teaching and learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23(7), 1217–1233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2006.07.016
Lester, P. E. (1987). Development and factor analysis of the teacher job satisfaction questionnaire (TJSQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 47(1), 223–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164487471031
Lindblom-Ylänne, S., Trigwell, K., Nevgi, A., & Ashwin, P. (2006). How approaches to teaching are affected by discipline and teaching context. Studies in Higher Education, 31(3), 285–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600680539
Löfström, E., Anspal, T., Hannula, M.S. & Poom-Valickis, K. (2010). Metaphors about ‘the teacher’: gendered, discipline-specific and persistent? In J. Mikk, M. Veisson, & P. Luik (Eds.), Teacher’s Personality and Professionalism. Estonian Studies in Education (pp. 105–122). Peter Lang.
Löfström, E. & Poom-Valickis, K. (2013). Beliefs about teaching: persistent or malleable? A longitudinal study of prospective student teachers’ beliefs. Teaching and Teacher Education, 35, 104-113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2013.06.004
Löfström E., Poom-Valickis K., & Hannula M. S. (2011). Categorisation of teacher metaphors. [Unpublished manual].
Mahlios, M., Massengill‐Shaw, D., & Barry, A. (2010). Making sense of teaching through metaphors: a review across three studies. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 16(1), 49–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600903475645
Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (1995). Designing qualitative research. Sage.
Martínez, M. A., Sauleda, N., & Huber, G. L. (2001). Metaphors as blueprints of thinking about teaching and learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 965–977. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00043-9
Martínez-de-la-Hidalga, Z., & Villardón-Gallego, L. (2017). Using metaphors to know the conceptions about the teaching profession in initial teacher education. International Journal of Educational Psychology, 6(2), 183–208. https://doi.org/10.17583/ijep.2017.2602
Ministry of Education and Research of Estonia. (2014). Estonian Lifelong Learning Strategy 2020. Ministry of Education and Research of Estonia.
Moè, A., Pazzaglia, F., & Ronconi, L. (2010). When being able is not enough. The combined value of positive affect and self-efficacy for job satisfaction in teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(5), 1145–1153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.02.010
Muñoz-Salinas, Y. (2023). Understanding the connection between pre-service teachers’ emotions and identity through metaphor: a qualitative study into six candidates from a Chilean university. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2023.2249463
OECD. (2010). TALIS 2008 Technical report. OECD. https://www.oecd.org/education/school/TALIS-2008-Technical-Report.pdf
OECD. (2015). PISA 2015 High Performers. Estonia. OECD. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/PISA-2015-estonia.pdf
OECD. (2020). TALIS 2018 Results (Volume II): Teachers and school leaders as valued professionals. TALIS, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/19cf08df-en
Pajares, F. M. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543062003307
Patchen, T., & Crawford, T. (2011). From gardeners to tour guides: The epistemological struggle revealed in teacher-generated metaphors of teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 62(3), 286–298. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487110396716
Perie, M., & Baker, D. P. (1997). Job satisfaction among America’s Teachers: Effects of workplace conditions, background characteristics, and teacher compensation. Statistical analysis report. U.S. Department of Education Office of Educational Research and Improvement NCES 97–XXX.
Pinnegar, S., Mangelson, J., Reed, M., & Groves, S. (2011). Exploring preservice teachers’ metaphor plotlines. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(3), 639–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.11.002
Postareff, L., Lindblom-Ylänne, S., & Nevgi, A. (2008). A follow-up study of the effect of pedagogical training on teaching in higher education. Higher Education, 56(1), 29–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-007-9087-z
Pratt, D. D. (1992). Conceptions of teaching. Adult Education Quarterly, 42(4), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1177/074171369204200401 Prosen, S., Smrtnik Vitulić, H., & Poljšak Škraban, O. (2011). Teachers’ emotional expression in interaction with students of different ages. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 1(3), 141–157. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.419
Prosser, M. E., Trigwell, K., Ramsden, P., & Benjamin, J. (2000). What university teachers teach and how they teach it. Instructional Science, 28, 387–412. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1026559912774 Saban, A. (2010). Prospective teachers’ metaphorical conceptualizations of learner. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 290–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2009.03.017
Saban, A., Kocbeker, B. N., & Saban, A. (2007). Prospective teachers’ conceptions of teaching and learning revealed through metaphor analysis. Learning and Instruction, 17, 123–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.01.003
Santiago, P., Levitas, P., Radó, P., & Shewbridge, C. (2016). OECD Reviews of School Resources: Estonia 2016. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264251731-en
Seidman, S. A., & Zager, J. (1987). The Teacher Burnout Scale. Educational Research Quarterly, 11(1), 26–33. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ358718
Seung, E., Park, S., & Narayan, R. (2011). Exploring elementary pre-service teachers’ beliefs about science teaching and learning as revealed in their metaphor writing. Journal of Science Education & Technology, 20, 703–714. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-010-9263-2
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X015002004
Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik. S. (2011). Teacher job satisfaction and motivation to leave the teaching profession: Relations with school context, feeling of belonging, and emotional exhaustion. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(6), 1029–1038. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2011.04.001
Smrtnik Vitulič, H., & Lesar, I. (2017). Changes in beliefs regarding good teachers and the characteristics of child development of primary education students. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 7(4), 185–205. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.370
Thomas, L., & Beauchamp, C. (2011). Understanding new teachers’ professional identities through metaphor. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(4), 762–769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2010.12.007
Timms, C., & Brough, P. (2013). “I like being a teacher”: Career satisfaction, the work environment and work engagement. Journal of Educational Administration, 51(6), 768–789. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEA-06-2012-0072
Tobin, K. (1990). Changing metaphors and beliefs. A master switch for teaching? Theory Into Practice, 29, 122–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405849009543442
Tubin, D. (2005). Fantasy, vision, and metaphor – three tracks to teachers’ minds. Qualitative Report, 10(3), 543–560. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2005.1841
Trigwell, K. (2012). Relations between teachers’ emotions in teaching and their approaches to teaching in higher education. Instructional Science, 40(3), 607–621. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-011-9192-3
van Veen, K., Sleegers, P., & P-H. van de Ven, P-H. (2005). One teacher’s identity, emotions, and commitment to change: A case study into the cognitive-affective processes of a secondary school teacher in the context of reforms. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21, 917–934. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2005.06.004
Wang, H., Lee, S. Y., & Hall, N. C. (2022). Coping profiles among teachers: Implications for emotions, job satisfaction, burnout, and quitting intentions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 68, Article 102030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2021.102030
Weiqi, C. (2007). The structure of secondary school teacher job satisfaction and its relationship with attrition and work enthusiasm. Chinese Education & Society, 40(5), 17–31. https://doi.org/10.2753/CED1061-1932400503
Yildirim, K. (2015). Testing the main determinants of teachers’ professional well-being by using a mixed method. Teacher Development, 19(1), 59–78. https://doi.org/10.1080/13664530.2014.970663
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitted article, which will be published online in the Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal (for short: CEPS Journal) by University of Ljubljana Press (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education, Kardeljeva ploščad 16, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). The Author’s/Authors’ name(s) will be evident in the article in the journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in the hands of the publisher.
- The Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit themselves to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
