Khine Swe, M. (Ed.) (2013) Critical Analysis of Science Textbooks: Evaluating instructional effectiveness
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
Bezemer, J., & Kress, G. (2010). Changing text: A social semiotic analysis of textbooks. Deigns for Learning, 3, 10–29.
Clement, P. (2008). Critical analysis of school science textbooks. Science Education International, 19, 93–96.
Graham, C. (1941). Some data pertinent to textbooks of general science. Science Education, 25, 35–41.
Issitt, J. (2004). Reflections on the study of textbooks. History of Education, 33, 683–696.
Izquierdo, M., & Gouvea, G. (2008). A proposal for textbook analysis: Rhetorical structure. Science Education International, 19, 209-218.
Koppal, M., & Caldwell, A. (2004). Meeting the challenge of science literacy: Project 2061 efforts to improve science education. Cell Biology Education, 3, 28–30.
Clement, P. (2008). Critical analysis of school science textbooks. Science Education International, 19, 93–96.
Graham, C. (1941). Some data pertinent to textbooks of general science. Science Education, 25, 35–41.
Issitt, J. (2004). Reflections on the study of textbooks. History of Education, 33, 683–696.
Izquierdo, M., & Gouvea, G. (2008). A proposal for textbook analysis: Rhetorical structure. Science Education International, 19, 209-218.
Koppal, M., & Caldwell, A. (2004). Meeting the challenge of science literacy: Project 2061 efforts to improve science education. Cell Biology Education, 3, 28–30.
Published
2017-07-18
Section
REVIEW
In order to ensure both the widest dissemination and protection of material published in CEPS Journal, we ask Authors to transfer to the Publisher (Faculty of Education, University of Ljubljana) the rights of copyright in the Articles they contribute. This enables the Publisher to ensure protection against infringement.
