Let’s Repair the Broken Galileo Thermometer
Abstract
We have developed and verified laboratory work as guided inquiry for upper secondary level students, focusing on conceptual understanding of the physical principle that forms the basis of temperature measurement,
and on improvement of selected skills. Conceptual pre-test questions initiate the students’ interest and help identify input misconceptions. Using the method of interactive lecture demonstration, the students are introduced to the measurement principles of the Galileo thermometer. The students are then set the problem of how to repair a broken thermometer when tap water is used instead of ethanol. Since the density of water is greater than that of ethanol, the buoys must be adjusted by the students to achieve correct temperature measurement. The next steps of the activity have a hands-on orientation. The students work in pairs, guided by worksheet instructions. At the end of the activity, they complete self-assessment rubrics focused on skill improvement and final conceptual understanding. The results of the conceptual pretest questions and of the self-assessment rubrics from 461 participants are analysed and recommendations are made for teachers.
Downloads
References
a critical review of the literature. International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 665–701.
European Commission (EC), & High level group on science education (2007). Science education
NOW: A renewed pedagogy for the future of Europe (EUR 22845). Brussels: DG Research.
Güémez, J. et al. (2009). Toys in physics lectures and demonstrations—a brief review. Physics Education,
44(1), 53–64.
IAP – International Conference (2010). Taking inquiry - Based science education into secondary education
in management decision. Retrieved from http://www.interacademies.org/15266/Taking-inquirybased-
science-education-into-secondary-education#tabs
Nickas, G. D. (1989). A thermometer based on Archimedes’ principle. American Journal of Physics,
57(9), 845–846.
Reeves, T. C. (2006). Design research from the technology perspective. In J. V. Akker, K. Gravemeijer,
S. McKenney, & N. Nieveen (Eds.), Educational design research (pp. 86–109). London, UK: Routledge.
Roehrig, Gillian H., & Luft, J. A. (2004). Constraints experienced by beginning secondary science
teachers in implementing scientific inquiry lessons. International Journal of Science Education, 26(1),
3–24.
Sadler, T. D., Amirshokoohi, A., Kazempour, M., & Allspaw, K. M. (2006). Socioscience and ethics in
science classrooms: Teacher perspectives and strategies. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(4),
353–376.
Ucke, C., & Schlichting, H. J. (2017) Galileo chain thermometer. Physics Education, 52(4), 045012.
Zion, M., Cohen, S., & Amir, R. (2007). The spectrum of dynamic inquiry. Research in Science Education,
37(4), 423–447.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitted article, which will be published online in the Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal (for short: CEPS Journal) by University of Ljubljana Press (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education, Kardeljeva ploščad 16, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). The Author’s/Authors’ name(s) will be evident in the article in the journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in the hands of the publisher.
- The Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit themselves to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.