# Primary Teacher Studentsâ€™ Understanding of Fraction Representational Knowledge in Slovenia and Kosovo

### Abstract

The study of primary teacher studentsâ€™ knowledge of fractions is very important because fractions present a principal and highly complex set of concepts and skills within mathematics. The present study examines primary teacher studentsâ€™ knowledge of fraction representations in Slovenia and Kosovo. According to research, there are five subconstructs of fractions: the part-whole subconstruct, the measure subconstruct, the quotient subconstruct, the operator subconstruct and the ratio subconstruct. Our research focused on the part-whole and the measure subconstructs of fractions, creating nine tasks that were represented by different modes of representation: area/region, number line and sets of objects. The sample consisted of 76 primary teacher students in Slovenia and 93 primary teacher students in Kosovo. Both similarities and differences of the primary teacher studentsâ€™ interpretations of the representations across the two countries were revealed and compared. The findings suggest that primary teacher students from both countries need to upgrade their understanding of fractions. The analysis confirms that the formal mathematical knowledge acquired by primary teacher students is not necessarily adequate for teaching elementary concepts in school.

### Downloads

### References

Ball, D. L. (1990). The mathematical understandings that prospective teachers bring to teacher education. The Elementary School Journal, 90(4), 449â€“466.

Ball, D. L., Hill, H. C., & Bass, H. (2005). Knowing mathematics for teaching: Who knows mathematics well enough to teach third grade, and how can we decide. American Educator, 29(1), 14â€“17, 20â€“22, 43â€“46.

Barmby, P., Harries, T., Higgins, S., & Suggate, J. (2009). The array representation and primary childrenâ€™s understanding and reasoning in multiplication. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 70(3), 217â€“241.

Behr, M. J., Post, T. R., Harel, G., & Lesh, R. (1993). Rational numbers: Toward a semantic analysis - emphasis on the operator construct. In T. Carpenter, E. Fennema, & T. Romberg (Eds.), Rational numbers: An integration of research, (pp. 13â€“47). Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Bobos, G., & Sierpinska, A. (2017). Measurement approach to teaching fractions: A design experiment in a pre-service course for elementary teachers. International Journal for Mathematics Teaching and Learning, 18(2), 203â€“239.

Castro-Rodriguez, E., Pitta-Pantazi, D., Rico, L., & Gomez, P. (2016). Prospective teachersâ€™ understanding of the multiplicative part-whole relationship of fraction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 92(1), 129â€“146.

doi:10.1007/s10649-015-9673-4

Charalambous, C. Y., & Pitta-Pantazi, D. (2007). Drawing on a theoretical model to study studentsâ€™ understandings of fractions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 64(3), 293â€“316.

Chinnappan, M., & Forrester, P. (2014). Generating procedural and conceptual knowledge of fractions by pre-service teachers. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 26(4), 871â€“896.

Clarke, D., Roche, A., & Mitchell, A. (2007). Year six fraction understanding: A part of the whole story. Mathematics: Essential research, essential practice. Proceedings of the 30th annual conference of the mathematics education research group of Australia (pp. 207â€“216). Adelaide: MERGA.

de Castro, B. V. (2008). Cognitive models: The missing link to learning fraction multiplication and division. Asia Pacific Education Review, 9(2), 101â€“112.

Empson, S. B., & Levi, L. (2011). Extending childrenâ€™s mathematics: fractions and decimals. Porstmouth,

NH: Heinemann.

Hackenberg, A. (2007). Units coordination and construction of improper fractions: A revision of the splitting hypothesis. Journal of Mathematical Behaviour, 26(1), 27â€“47.

Hallett, D., Nunes, T., & Bryant, P. (2010). Individual differences in conceptual and procedural knowledge when learning fractions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(2), 395â€“406.

Hamdan, N., & Gunderson, E. A. (2017). The number line is a critical spatial-numerical representation: Evidence from a fraction intervention. Developmental Psychology, 53(3), 587â€“596.

Hill, H. C., Rowan, B., & Ball, D. L. (2005). Effects of teachersâ€™ mathematical knowledge for teaching on student achievement. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 371â€“406.

Hill, H. C., Schilling, S. G., & Ball, D. L. (2004). Developing measures of teachersâ€™ mathematics knowledge for teaching. The Elementary School Journal, 105(1), 11â€“30.

Keijzer, R., & Terwel, J. (2001). Audreyâ€™s acquisition of fractions: A case study into the learning of formal mathematics. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 47(1), 53â€“73.

Kieren, T. E. (1976). On the mathematical, cognitive and instructional foundations of rational numbers. In R. A. Lesh (Ed.), Number and Measurement (pp. 101â€“144). Fonte: ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 120 027.

Kieren, T. E. (1993). Rational and fractional numbers: from quotient fields to recursive understanding. In P. T. Carpenter, E. Fennema, & T. Romberg (Eds.), Rational numbers. An integration of research (pp. 49â€“84). New Jersey, NJ: Erlbaum.

Lamon, S. J. (2012). Teaching fractions and ratios for understanding (3rd ed). New York, NY and London, UK: Taylor & Francis.

Lin, C.-Y., Becker, J., Byun, M.-R., & Ko, Y.-Y. (2013). Enhancing pre-service teachersâ€™ fraction knowledge through open approach instruction. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 32(3), 309â€“330.

Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary school mathematics (Vol. 1). New Jersey, NJ: Routledge.

Manfreda Kolar, V., JaneÅ¾iÄ, A., & Hodnik ÄŒadeÅ¾, T. (2015). Diagnosing studentsâ€™ difficulties in understanding the concept of fraction. In J. Novotna & Moraova, H (Eds.), Developing mathematical language and reasoning (pp. 232â€“240). Prague: Charles University, Faculty of Education.

Moss, J., & Case, R. (2011). Developing childrenâ€™s understanding of the rational numbers: A new model and an experimental curriculum. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(2), 122â€“147.

National Mathematics Advisory Panel (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Department of Education.

Newton, K. J. (2008). An extensive analysis of preservice elementary teachersâ€™ knowledge of fractions. American Educational Research Journal, 45(4), 1080â€“1110.

Ni, Y., & Di-Zhou, Y. (2005). Teaching and learning fraction and rational numbers: The origins and implications of whole number bias. Educational Psychologist, 40(1), 27â€“52.

OECD (2016). PISA 2015 Results (Vol. 1): Excellence and equity in education. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Olanoff, D., Lo, J.-J., & Tobias, J. M. (2014). Mathematical content knowledge for teaching elementary mathematics: A focus on fractions. The Mathematics Enthusiast, 11(2), 267â€“310.

Pantziara, M., & Philippou, G. (2012). Levels of studentsâ€™ â€˜conceptionâ€™ of fractions. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79(1), 61â€“83.

Park, J., GÃ¼Ã§ler, B., & McCrory, R. (2013). Teaching prospective teachers about fractions: historical and

pedagogical perspectives. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 82(3), 455â€“479.

Piaget, J., Inhelder, B., & Szeminska, A. (1960). The childâ€™s conception of geometry. New York, NY: Basic Books.

Pothier, Y., & Sawada, D. (1983). Partitioning: The emergence of rational numbers ideas in young children. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 14(5), 307â€“317.

Saxe, G. B., Taylor, E. V., McIntosh, C., & Gearhart, M. (2005). Representing fractions with standard notation: A developmental analysis. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 36(2), 137â€“157.

Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4â€“14.

Son, J.-W., & Lee, J.-E. (2016). Pre-service teachersâ€™ understanding of fraction multiplication, representational knowledge, and computational skills. Mathematics Teacher Education and Development, 18(2), 5â€“28.

Steffe, P. L., & Olive, J. (2010). Childrenâ€™s fractional knowledge. New York, NY: Springer.

Tsao, Y. L. (2005). The number sense of pre-servÄ±ce elementary. College Student Journal, 39(4), 647â€“679.

TunÃ§-Pekkan, Z. (2015). An analysis of elementary school childrenâ€™s fractional knowledge depicted with circle, rectangle, and number line representations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 89(3), 419â€“441.

Understanding fractions: Interpretations and representations. An iTalk2Learn guide (2014). Retrieved from http://www.italk2learn.eu/wp-content/uploads/2014/11/Understanding-fractions-Interpretations-and-representations.pdf

Van de Walle, J. A., Karp, K. S., & Bay-Williams, J. M. (2010). Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally (7th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Allyn & Bacon.

Van Steenbrugge, H., Valcke, M., & Desoete, A. (2010). Mathematics learning difficulties: Teachersâ€™ professional knowledge and the use of commercially available learning packages. Educational Studies, 36(1), 59â€“71.

Van Steenbrugge, H., Valcke, M., & Desoete, A. (2014). Preservice elementary school teachersâ€™ knowledge of fractions: a mirror of studentsâ€™ knowledge? Curriculum Studies, 46(1), 138â€“161.

Vula, E., & Kastrati, J. K. (2018). Preservice teacher procedural and conceptual knowledge of fractions. In G. Stylianides & K. Hino, Research advances in the mathematical education of pre-service elementary teachers (pp. 111â€“123). Cham: Springer.

Wilson, S. M. (2010). Knowledge for teaching mathematics in a primary school: Perspectives of preservice teachers. Canterbury, UK: University of Canterbury.

Yang, D.-C., Reys, R. E., & Reys, B. J. (2009). Number sense strategies used by pre-service teachers in Taiwan. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(2), 383â€“403.

*Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal*,

*8*(2), 71-96. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.342

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitted article, which will be published online in the
**Ce****nter for Educational Policy Studies****Journal (for short: CEPS Journal)**by University of Ljubljana Press (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education, Kardeljeva ploščad 16, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). The Author’s/Authors’ name(s) will be evident in the article in the journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in the hands of the publisher. - The Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit themselves to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.