Initial Beliefs of Preservice Chemistry Teachers in Croatia
Abstract
In the past thirty years, there have been many political changes in Croatia. These changes have had an impact on the education system, as well. The success of such educational changes depends on the teacher. The importance of teachers' knowledge and their beliefs about teaching and learning for their action in the classroom is well known. Beliefs influence teachers' representation of science, science knowledge and the organisation of knowledge and information. Keeping teacher professional development in mind, preservice teachers' beliefs need to be sought out and examined by educators. These beliefs should be developed in the direction of teaching chemistry taking into account recent reforms, as well as teaching and learning theories. Various studies have been undertaken in different education backgrounds and systems regarding the beliefs of both preservice and in-service teachers. These studies show different results depending on the context in which they are undertaken. Transferring data to the Croatian system is therefore difficult. However, there are no studies in Croatia focusing on the teachers' beliefs regrading teaching and learning chemistry. The present study evaluates the initial beliefs of preservice chemistry teachers in Croatia. The participants were instructed to draw themselves as chemistry teachers in a typical classroom situation in chemistry, and to answer four open questions. Data analysis follows a pattern representing a range between the predominance of more traditional orientations versus more modern teaching orientations, in line with educational theory focusing on: 1) beliefs about classroom organisation, 2) beliefs about teaching objectives, and 3) epistemological beliefs. The data revealed mostly traditional and teacher-centred knowledge among all of the participants. In the present paper, the data will be discussed and the implications for Croatian chemistry teacher training will be established.
Downloads
References
Al-Amoush, S., Markic, S., Usak, M., Erdogan, M., & Eilks, I. (2014). Beliefs about chemistry teaching and learning - a comparison of teachers and student teachers beliefs from Jordan, Turkey and Germany. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(4), 767–792.
Alexander, R. J. (2001). Culture and pedagogy: International comparisons in primary education. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishers.
Anderson, J. R. (1980). Cognitive psychology and its implication. San Francisco, CA: Freeman.
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundation of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
Brownlee, J., Schraw, G., & Berthelsen, D. (2011). (Eds.). Personal epistemology and teacher education. New York, NY: Routledge.
Bryan, L. A., & Atwater, M. M. (2002). Teacher beliefs and cultural models: A challenge for science teacher preparation programs. Science Education, 86 (6), 821–839.
Bryan L. A. (2012). Research on science teacher beliefs. In B. Fraser, K. Tobin, & C. McRobbie (Eds.), Second International Handbook of Science Education. Dordrecht: Springer.
Buldur, S. (2017). A longitudinal investigation of the preservice science teachers’ beliefs about science teaching during a science teacher training programme. International Journal of Science Education, 39(1), 1–19.
Bursal, M. (2010). Turkish preservice elementary teachers’ self-efficacy beliefs regarding mathematics and science teaching. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 8(4), 649–666.
Bybee, R. W. (1997). Achieving scientific literacy: From purposes to practices. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
Cakiroglu, J., Cakiroglu, E., & Boone, W. J. (2005). Pre-service teacher self-efficacy beliefs regarding science teaching: A comparison of pre-service teachers in Turkey and the USA. Science Educator, 14(1), 31–40.
Calderhead, J. (1996). Teachers: Beliefs and knowledge. In D. C. Berliner & R. C. Calfee, R. (Eds.), Handbook of Educational Psychology (pp. 709–725). New York, NY: Macmillan.
Caleon, I. S., Tan, Y. S. M., & Cho, Y. H. (2018). Does teaching experience matter? The beliefs and practices of beginning and experienced physics teachers. Research in Science Education, 48(1), 117–149. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9562-6
Choi, S., & Ramsey, J. (2010). Constructing elementary teachers’ beliefs, attitudes and practical knowledge through an inquiry-based elementary science course. School Science and Mathematics, 109(6), 313–324.
De Jong, O. (2007). Trends in western science curricula and science education research: A bird’s eye view. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 6(1), 15–22.
Fenstermacher, G. D. (1979). A philosophical consideration of recent research on teacher effectiveness. Review of research in education, 6(1) 157–185.
Fischer, H. (2001). Verfahren zur Erfassung von Lehrer-Vorstellungen zum Lehren und Lernen in den Naturwissenschaften [A method for detecting teacher ideas for teaching and learning in science]. Zeitschrift der Didaktik der Naturwissenschaften, 7, 105–120.
Feucht, F. C. (2010). Epistemic climate in elementary classrooms. In L. D. Bendixen & F. C. Feucht (Eds.), Personal epistemology in the classroom: Theory, research, and implications for practice. (pp. 55–93). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511691904.003
Greene, J. G., & Yu, S. B. (2016). Educating critical thinkers: The role of epistemic cognition. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3(1), 45–53. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/2372732215622223
Gormally, C., Brickman, P., Hallar, B., & Armstrong, N. (2009). Effects of inquiry-based learning on students’ science literacy skills and confidence. International Journal for the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 3(2), Article 16.
Hamilton, M. (2017). Pedagogical transitions among science teachers: how does context intersect with teacher beliefs? Teachers and Teaching, 24(2), 151–165. doi:10.1080/13540602.2017.1367658
Jokic, B. (2016.). Nacionalni kurikulum nastavnog predmeta kemije [National curriculum of the chemistry class]. Retrieved from http://www.kurikulum.hr/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Kemija.pdf
Kang, N.-H., & Keys, C. W. (2000). An investigation of secondary school science teachers’ beliefs about and the practices of hands-on activities. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, New Orleans, LA.
Koballa, T., Gräber, W., Coleman, D. C., & Kemo, A. C. (2000). Prospective gymnasium teachers’ conceptions of chemistry learning and teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 22(2), 209–224.
Lederman, N. G. (1992). Students’ and teachers’ conceptions of the nature of science: A review of the research. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(4), 331–359.
Lunn Brownlee, J., Ferguson, L. E., & Ryan, M. (2017). Changing teachers’ epistemic cognition: A new conceptual framework for epistemic reflexivity. Educational Psychologist, 52(4), 242–252.
Markic, S. (2008). Studies on freshman science student teachers’ beliefs about science teaching and learning. Aachen: Shaker.
Markic, S., & Eilks, I. (2008). A case study on German first year chemistry student teachers’ beliefs about chemistry teaching, and their comparison with student teachers from other science teaching domains. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 9(1), 25–34.
Markic, S., & Eilks, I. (2013). Prospective chemistry teachers’ beliefs about teaching and learning – A cross-level study. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(4), 979–998.
Markic S., & Eilks I. (2014). Evaluating drawings to explore chemistry teachers’ pedagogical attitudes. In Kahveci M., Orgill M. (Eds.), Affective dimensions in chemistry education (pp. 259–278). Berlin, Heidelber: Springer.
Markic, S., Mamlok-Naaman, R., Hugerat, M., Hofstein, A., Dkeidek, I., & Kortam, N. (2016). One country, two cultures - A multi-perspective view on Israeli chemistry teachers’ beliefs about teaching and learning. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 22(2), 131–147.
Meijer, P. C., Verloop, N., & Beijaard, D. (2002). Multi-Method triangulation in a qualitative study in teachers’ practical knowledge: an attempt to increase internal validity. Quality & Quantity, 36(2), 145–167.
Nespor, J. (1987). The role of beliefs in the practice of teaching. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 19(4), 317–328. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1080/0022027870190403
O´Loughlin, M., & Campbell, M. B. (1988). Teachers’ preparation, teacher empowerment, and reflective inquiry: A critical perspective. Teacher Education Quarterly, 15(4), 25–53.
Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: Cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332. Retrieved from http://rer.sagepub.com/content/62/3/307
Richardson, V. (2003). Preservice teachers’ beliefs. In J. Rath, & A. C. McAninch, (Eds.), Advances in teacher education series, 6 (pp. 1–22). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
Roth, K. J., Druker, S. L., Garnier, H. E., Lemmens, M., Chen, C., & Kawanaka, T. (2006). Teaching science in five countries: Results from the TIMSS 1999 video study (NCES 2006-011). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Savasci-Acikalin, F. (2009). Teacher beliefs and practice in science education. APFSLT, 10(1), 1–14.
Schommer-Aikins, M. (2004). Explaining the epistemological belief systems: introducing the embedded systemic model and coordinated research approach. Educational Psychologist, 39(1), 19–29.
Schommer, M. (1990). Effects of beliefs about the nature of knowledge on comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(3), 498–504.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1–22.
Simicic, S. (2018). Usage of particulate drawing in analysis, learning, testing and improvement of conceptual knowledge in the initial chemistry teaching. Split: Faculty of Science.
Smith, L. (2005). The impact of early life history on teachers’ beliefs: In-school and out of-school experiences as learner and knowers of science. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 11(1), 5–36.
Swanborn, P.G. (1996). A common base for quality control criteria in quantitative and qualitative research. Quality and Quantity, 30(1), 19–35.
Thomas, J., Pedersen, J. E., & Finson, K. (2001). Validating the Draw-A-Science-Teacher-Test Checklist (DASTT-C): Exploring mental models and teacher beliefs. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 12(4), 295–310.
Thompson, A. G. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and conceptions: a synthesis of the research. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics learning and teaching (pp. 127–146). New York, NY: Macmillan.
Törner, G. (2002). Epistemologische Grundüberzeugungen – verborgene Variablen beim Lehren
und Lernen der Mathematik [Basic Epistemological Beliefs - Hidden Variables in Teaching and Learning Mathematics]. Der Mathematikunterricht, 48(4/5), 103–128.
Uzuntiryaki, E., Boz, Y., Kirbulut, D., & Bektas, O. (2010). Do pre-service chemistry teachers reflect their beliefs about constructivism in their teaching practices? Research in Science Education,40(3), 403–424. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-009-9127-z
Vladusic, R., Bucat, B., & Ozic, M. (2016a). Understanding ionic bonding – a scan across the Croatian education system. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(4), 685–699. doi:10.1039/C6RP00040A
Vladusic, R., Bucat, B., & Ozic, M. (2016b). Understanding of words and symbols by chemistry university students in Croatia. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17(4), 474–488. doi:10.1039/C6RP00037A
Wilson, B., & Wilson, M. (1979). Children’s story drawing: Reinventing words. School Arts, 8, 6–11.
Wehling, L. J., & Charters, W. W. Jr. (1969). Dimensions of teacher beliefs about teaching process. American Educational Research Journal, 6(1), 7–30.
Woolfolk-Hoy, A., Davis, H., & Pape, S. J. (2006). Teacher knowledge and beliefs. In P. A. Alexander & P. H. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 715– 737). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitted article, which will be published online in the Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal (for short: CEPS Journal) by University of Ljubljana Press (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education, Kardeljeva ploščad 16, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). The Author’s/Authors’ name(s) will be evident in the article in the journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in the hands of the publisher.
- The Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit themselves to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
