Are the Benefits of Emergency Remote Education Truly Benefits? Ethical Dilemmas and Research Results on Emergency Remote Education from the Perspective of Prospective Teachers and the Foundations of Pedagogical Study Programmes
Abstract
Commencing in March 2020 and continuing during the 2020/2021 academic year, all university education was forced to introduce emergency remote education due to restrictions imposed in countries affected by the Covid-19 pandemic. In the present empirical study, which includes a representative sample of students from one of the education faculties in Slovenia, data was obtained on the conditions and implementation of study programmes via emergency remote education. The areas of study were the material conditions for studying, the pedagogical process in emergency remote education, the ethics of the rules of performance and assessment, and the academic community. The study provides an analysis of the changes that took place in the implementation of the pedagogical process during emergency remote education from the students' perspective and an examination of the extent to which it provided equal opportunities for students. The results show that the success of students in their studies depends on technical conditions and the environment; that rapid transitions from one type of studying to another (from emergency remote education to hybrid or entirely at the faculty) are not recommended; that the teaching process was based on the concept of face-to-face teaching, partly adapting to different conditions on this basis; and finally, that the “desire for comfort†entered into the assessment of the quality and fairness of the educational process. Based on the values of our professional ethical judgement and the results of the study, we conclude that higher education teachers should be aware that providing comfort to some students who have the appropriate conditions for studying or simply preferring to teach from the comfort of home are not adequate reasons to maintain online delivery of courses compared to the criteria of justice and quality in education.
Downloads
References
Anderson, L. W. (2021). Schooling interrupted: Educating children and youth in the Covid-19 era. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 11(Special Issue), 17-38. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.1128
Cohen, L., Manion, l., & Morrison, K. (2011). Research methods in education. 7th Edition. Routledge.
Gradišek, P., & Polak, A. (2021). Insights into learning and examination experience of higher education students during the Covid-19 pandemic. Sodobna pedagogika, 72(138), 286-307.
Harting, K., & Erthal, M. (2005). History of distance learning. Information Technology. Learning and Performance Journal, 23, 35-44.
Hodges, C., Moore, S., Lockee, B., Trust, T., & Bond, A. (2023, February 12). The difference between emergency remote teaching and online learning. https://er.educause.edu/articles/2020/3/the-difference-between-emergency-remote-teachingandonline-learning
Hodnik, T., & Krek, J. (2023). Emergency remote teaching during the Covid-19 pandemic: Ethical dilemmas and research results from the perspective of the foundations of teacher education study programmes. In G. Stoković, J. Lukić, J. Stanivuković (eds.). International scientific conference Education During the Covid-19 Pandemic: Experience and Lessons Learned: Book of abstracts (pp. 108-109). University of Belgrade Teacher Education Faculty, Beograd.
Hodnik, T., Krek, J., Podlogar, N., & Vogrinc, J. (2021). Quality and ethical dilemmas in the education of future teachers under the conditions of distance education. In Challenges of distance teaching in teacher education and education: [Abstracts] and programme (p. 2). University of Ljubljana Faculty of Education, Ljubljana.
Hume, D. (2006 [1748]). An enquiry concerning human understanding: A critical edition. Clarendon Press.
Karataş, F. Ö, Akaygün, S., Çelik, S., Kokoç, M., & Nur Yılmaz, S. (2021). Challenge accepted: Experiences of Turkish faculty members at the time of emergency remote teaching. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 11(Special Issue), 141-163. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.11.Sp.Issue
Kodelja, Z. (2006). O praviÄnosti v izobraževanju [On justice in education]. Krtina.
Korhonen, T., Juurola, L., Salo, L., & Airaksinen (2021). Digitisation or digitalisation: Diverse practices of the distance education period in Finland. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 11(Special Issue), 165-193. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.1125
Krek, J., Hodnik, T., Podlogar, N., & Vogrinc, J. (2021). Education of future teachers under the conditions of distance education. In A. Beka (ed.). Kosovo International Conference on Educational Research KICER: Book of abstracts (p. 51). University of Pristhina Faculty of Education, Prishtina.
Loveless, B. (2023, February 12). Distance learning: The ultimate guide to online learning. https://www.educationcorner.com/distance-learning/distance-online-learning-guide.html
Mäkipää, T., Hahl, K., & Luodonpää-Manni, M. (2021). Teachers’ perceptions of assessment and
feedback practices in Finland’s foreign language classes during the Covid-19 Pandemic. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 11(Special Issue), 219-240. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.1108
Plevnik, M. (2021). The challenges of conducting practical exercises in the scope of an adapted educational process in higher education institutions during the Covid-19 epidemic. Sodobna Pedagogika, 72(138), 308-320.
Podlesek, A., KavÄiÄ, V. (2021). Generalised anxiety in Slovenian university students during the Covid-19 pandemic. Sodobna pedagogika. 72(138), 322-341.
Å imenc, M. (2021). Vloga tehnologije v vzgoji in izobraževanju ter enake možnosti uÄencev v obdobju pandemije [The role of technology in education and equal opportunities for students in the Covid-19 crisis]. Sodobna pedagogika, 72(138), 12-26.
Unver, E., & Sungur, A. (2022) Distance learning under the Covid-19 conditions within architectural education. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 12(3), 191-219.
Žerak, U., Podlogar, N., LiÅ¡ić, A., Lavrih, L., Fricelj, N., & JuriÅ¡eviÄ, M. (2021). ZnaÄilnosti uÄne samoregulacije Å¡tudentov pri Å¡tudiju na daljavo med epidemijo covida-19 [Characteristics of students’ learning self-regulation in distance learning during the Covid-19 epidemic]. Sodobna pedagogika, 72(138), 234-251.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitted article, which will be published online in the Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal (for short: CEPS Journal) by University of Ljubljana Press (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education, Kardeljeva ploščad 16, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). The Author’s/Authors’ name(s) will be evident in the article in the journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in the hands of the publisher.
- The Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit themselves to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
