Secondary School Students’ Response to Learning the Concept of Destruction and Transformation of an Artwork into Another Artwork in the Visual Arts Class
Abstract
This empirical study aimed to introduce the concept of destruction and transformation into secondary school art education as a potential way of incorporating conceptual and contemporary artistic practices. Experts have highlighted the absence of such content in art education, emphasising the responsibility of teachers to integrate it into the learning process thoughtfully. To encourage students to engage in profound thinking about destruction and internalise the essence of conceptual art through practical experiences, we conducted a study at a Ljubljana secondary school. Here, students created their initial artwork (ready-made), a prerequisite for its subsequent destruction and transformation into a new artwork. We included two first-year classes, exploring 1) their response to the presented artworks aligned with the researched concept, 2) their attitude towards destroying and transforming their initial artwork, and 3) their response to the concept of destruction and transformation through their creative practice. Over four school hours, we gathered data through both qualitative and quantitative research techniques. The results showed that in-depth discussions of conceptual foundations led to a predominantly positive student attitude towards contemporary artworks. They not only understood but also internalised the essence of these artworks, which was vividly reflected in their practical artistic expressions. In conclusion, the study effectively introduced the concept of destruction and transformation into secondary school art education, promoting a deeper understanding of contemporary art among students while cultivating their creative and critical thinking skills.
Downloads
References
BatiÄ, J. (2011). The field trip as part of spatial (architectural) design art classes. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 1(2), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.429
Bremmer, M., Heijnen, E., & Kersten, S. (2020). Teacher as conceptual artist. International Journal of Art & Design Education, 40(1), 82–98. https://doi.org/10.1111/jade.12318
CenciÄ, M. (2014). UÄne metode kot spodbuda k ustvarjalnosti [Teaching methods as a stimulus to creativity]. Didakta, 24(171), 5–7.
Downing, D. & Watson, R. (2004). School art: What’s in it? Exploring visual arts in secondary schools. National Foundation for Educational Research.
Duh, M. (2004). Vrednotenje kot didaktiÄni problem pri likovni vzgoji [Assessment as a didactic issue in art education]. PedagoÅ¡ka fakulteta.
Gaarder, J. (1997). Zofijin svet [Sophie’s world]. Obzorja.
Glogovec, V., & Žagar, D. (1992). Ustvarjalnost. Projektno vzgojno delo [Creativity. Project educational work]. Zavod RS za šolstvo in šport.
Gorjanc, T., & ÄŒrÄinoviÄ Rozman, J. (2015). Pomembnost prepoznavanja in spodbujanja otrokove ustvarjalnosti v uÄnem procesu [The importance of recognising and nurturing children’s creativity in the learning process]. Educa, 24(1/2), 42–46.
Herne, S. (2005). Download: Postcards Home Contemporary Art and New Technology in the Primary School. International Journal of Art and Design Education, 24(1), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1476-8070.2005.00419.x
Kemprl, M. (2013). Contemporary art and citizenship education: The possibilities of cross-curricular links on the level of content. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 3(1), 97–117. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.253
Kozjek Varl, K., & Duh, M. (2017). Prikaz medpredmetnega povezovanja na primeru implementacije sodobne umetnosti v osmi razred osnovne šole [Cross-curricular integration in the case of contemporary arts implementation in the eighth grade of primary school]. Revija za elementarno izobraževanje, 10(4), 377–397. https://doi.org/10.18690/1855-4431.10.4.377-397(2017)
Leuthold, S. (1999). Conceptual art, conceptualism, and aesthetic education. The Journal of Aesthetic Education, 33(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.2307/3333734
MarentiÄ-Požarnik, B. (2019). Psihologija uÄenja in pouka: od pouÄevanja k uÄenju [Psychology of learning and teaching: from teaching to learning]. DZS.
Marshall, J. (2008). Visible thinking: Using contemporary art to teach conceptual skills. Art Education, 61(2), 38–45. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2008.11651141
Pataky, G. (2020). “Do not touch it!†Today’s children’s visual competencies in comparison with the pre-digital era in light of their art educational environment. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 10(4), 75-96. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.925
Pivac, D. (2022). Problem-based learning and teaching in the process of experiencing and creating an artwork. In R. PotoÄik (Ed.), Innovative learning and teaching for quality careers of graduates and excellent higher education: Arts didactics in higher education (pp. 107–122). University of Ljubljana Press. https://doi.org/10.51746/9789617128314
PotoÄnik, R. (2020). Heritage preservation education: teachers’ preconceptions and teachers implementa- tion in visual arts classes. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 10(2), 49–76. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.792
Sullivan, G. (2002). Ideas and teaching: Making meaning from contemporary art. In Y. Gaudelius, & P. Speirs (Eds.), Contemporary issues in art education (pp. 23–35). Prentice Hall.
Tacol, T. (2003). Likovno izražanje. DidaktiÄna izhodiÅ¡Äa za problemski pouk likovne vzgoje v devetletni osnovni Å¡oli [Artistic expression. Didactic foundations for problem-based art education in nine-year elementary school]. Debora.
Tacol, T. (1999). DidaktiÄni pristop k naÄrtovanju likovnih nalog: izbrana poglavja iz likovne didaktike [Didactic approach to planning art tasks: selected chapters from art didactics]. Debora.
TomÅ¡iÄ Amon, B. (2020). Interdisciplinary connections through transmedia narratives in art education. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 10(4), 55–74. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.916
Twardzik Ching, C. L. (2017). Changing perspectives: Contemporary art practices in primary and secondary art classrooms. In Educating for change: The European conference on education 2017 (pp. 181–196). The International Academic Forum. https://papers.iafor.org/wp-content/uploads/conference-proceedings/ECE/ECE2017_proceedings.pdf
Twardzik Ching, C. L. (2015). Teaching contemporary art in primary schools. Athens Journal of Humanities & Arts, 2(2), 95–110. https://doi.org/10.30958/ajha.2-2-3
UÄni naÄrt. Gimnazija. Likovna umetnost [Curriculum. High School. Fine Arts]. (2008). Ministrstvo za Å¡olstvo in Å¡port: Zavod RS za Å¡olstvo.
VrliÄ, T., & ÄŒagran, B. (2003). EmpiriÄno uvajanje sodobnih vsebin v likovno vzgojo v osnovni Å¡oli [Empirical introduction of contemporary content in elementary school art education]. Sodobna pedagogika, 54(4), 126–142.
ZupanÄiÄ, T. (2011). “Prepovedane teme†v sodobni umetnostni vzgoji [“Forbidden topics†in contemporary visual arts education]? Revija za elementarno izobraževanje, 4(1–2), 47–60.
ZupanÄiÄ, T. (2006). Metoda likovnopedagoÅ¡kega koncepta: priroÄnik za uÄitelje [The method of art-pedagogical concept: a handbook for teachers]. Zavod RS za Å¡olstvo.
ZupanÄiÄ, T., & Velikonja A. (2017). BeneÅ¡ki bienale sodobne umetnosti in pouk likovne umetnosti v osnovni Å¡oli [The Venice biennale of contemporary art and arts in primary school]. Revija za elementarno izobraževanje, 10(2/3), 289–311.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitted article, which will be published online in the Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal (for short: CEPS Journal) by University of Ljubljana Press (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education, Kardeljeva ploščad 16, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). The Author’s/Authors’ name(s) will be evident in the article in the journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in the hands of the publisher.
- The Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit themselves to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
