Environmental Content as a Part of Science-Oriented Sustainable Development Goals in Grades 6 and 7 of Slovenian Primary School: An Analysis of Science Textbooks
Abstract
Slovenian science education in Grades 6 and 7 (11- and 12-year-old students) of primary school focuses on the integration of various science subjects. According to the current Slovenian science curriculum, environmental concepts, as a part of science-oriented sustainable development goals, are an integral part of the subject of science. In 2026, a new science curriculum will be introduced in the education system to provide students and teachers with competences for sustainable development. Consequently, the aim of this study is 1) to analyse old (valid prior to the 2010/2011 school year) and current 6th and 7th-grade Slovenian science curriculum for primary school from an environmental and sustainability perspective, and 2) to investigate textual and pictorial material of four 6th grade and four 7th grade textbooks available for students in the current school year (2023/24) of primary school, that relate to environmental content, as well as their overall structure. The analysis of the textbooks showed that all textbooks explain some environmental topics recommended by the national curriculum. The text is supported by pictorial elements that present phenomena with realistic pictures on the macrolevel. The present study suggests that some environmental content is present in 6th- and 7th-grade science textbooks that are consistent with the learning goals of the curriculum but that a significant amount of sustainability content is missing. For this reason, the curriculum reform currently underway in Slovenia should more clearly include the implementation and thoroughly consider the integration of science-oriented sustainable development goals into the science curriculum in Grades 6 and 7.
Downloads
References
Agbedahin, A. V. (2019). Sustainable development, Education for Sustainable Development, and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development: Emergence, efficacy, eminence, and future. Sustainable Development, 27(4), 669–680.
Ahmad, J., Sritharan, G., & Nasir, N. N. (2015). The effectiveness of video and pamphlets in influencing youth on environmental education. Jurnal Komunikasi: Malaysian Journal of Communication, 31(1), 281–296.
Ashmann, S., & Franzen, R. L. (2017). In what ways are teacher candidates being prepared to teach about the environment? A case study from Wisconsin. Environmental Education Research, 23(3), 299–323. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2015.1101750
BaÄiÄ, T., Vilfan, M., Strgulc KrajÅ¡ek, S., Dolenc Koce, J., & KrajÅ¡ek, V. (2012). Spoznavamo naravo 6. UÄbenik za naravoslovje v 6. razredu osnovne Å¡ole [We learn about the nature 7, Science textbook for 7th grade of primary school]. Narava d.o.o.
BaÄiÄ, T., Vilhar, B., Vilfan, M., Strgulc KrajÅ¡ek, S., FiÅ¡er, C., Bevk, D., & Tkavc, R. (2014). Spoznavamo naravo 7. UÄbenik za naravoslovje v 7. razredu osnovne Å¡ole [We learn about the nature 7, Science textbook for 7th grade of primary school]. Narava d.o.o.
Bianchi, G., Pisiotis, U., & Cabrera, M. (2022). GreenComp, the European sustainability competence framework, European Commission. https://doi.org/10.2760/13286
Bromley, P., Meyer, J. W., & Ramirez, F. O. (2011). The worldwide spread of environmental discourse in history, civics, and social studies textbooks. Comparative Education Review, 55(4), 517–545.
Bunce, D. M., & Gabel, D. (2002). Differential Effect in the achievement of males and females of teaching the particulate nature of chemistry. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(10), 911–972. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.10056
Chen, X. (2017). A comparative study of visual representations in conventional, digitized and interactive high school science textbooks. Journal of Visual Literacy, 36(2), 104–122.
Cook, M. (2008). Students’ comprehension of science concepts depicted in textbook illustrations. Electronic Journal of Science Education, 12(1), 1–14.
Dermastia, M., Denac, D., GoriÄan, Å ., Repnik, R., UrbanÄiÄ, M., & Vidic, T. (2017). Jaz pa vem, kako rožice cveto. Naravoslovje za 6. razred osnovne Å¡ole [But I know how flowers bloom… Science for 6th grade of primary school]. Modrijan.
Devetak, I., Rozman, L., Sopotnik, M., & Susman, K. (2013). Dotik narave 7. UÄbenik za naravoslovje v 7. razredu osnovne Å¡ole [Touch of Nature 7. Science textbook for 7th grade of primary school]. Rokus Klett.
Devetak, I., Vogrinc, J., & Glažar, S. A. (2010). States of matter explanations in Slovenian textbooks for students aged 6 to 14. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 5(2), 217–235.
Devetak, I., & Vogrinc, J. (2013). The criteria for evaluating the quality of the science textbooks. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Critical Analysis of Science Textbooks (pp. 3–15). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4168-3_1
Dunn, P. K., Brunton, E. A., & Farrar, M. B. (2022). Your online textbook is ready: a shareable, interactive online textbook in response to COVID-19 lockdowns. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 53(3), 582–593.
Dimopoulos, K., Koulaidis, V., & Sklaveniti, S. (2003). Towards an analysis of visual images in school science textbooks and press articles about science and technology. Research in Science Education, 33(2), 189–216. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025006310503
Eilks, I. (2015). Science education and education for sustainable development-justifications, models, practices and perspectives. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science & Technology Education, 11(1), 149–158
Erjavšek, M., Lovšin Kozina, F., & Kostanjevec, S. (2021). In-service home economics teachers’ attitudes to the integration of sustainable topics in the home economics subject. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 11(1), 27–47. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.614
Ernst, J. (2007). Factors associated with K–12 teachers’ use of environment-based education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 38(3), 15–32. https://doi.org/10.3200/JOEE.38.3.15-32
Ernst, J. (2009). Influences on US middle school teachers’ use of environment-base Education. Environmental Education Research, 15(1), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504620802710599
Ferrari, A., & Punie, Y. (2013). DIGCOMP: A framework for developing and understanding digital competence in Europe. http://digcomp.org.pl/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/DIGCOMP-1.0-2013.pdf
Fraser, J., Gupta, R., & Krasny, M. E. (2015). Practitioners’ perspectives on the purpose of environmental education. Environmental Education Research, 21(5), 777–800. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2014.933777
Freire, S., Baptista, M., & Freire, A. (2016). Sustainability and science learning: perceptions from 8th grade students involved with a role playing activity. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 4(8), 1757–1763.
Gkitzia, V., Salta K., & Tzougraki C. (2011). Development and application of suitable criteria for the evaluation of chemical representations in school textbooks. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 12, 5–14.
GlaviÄ, P. (2006). Pripombe prof. dr. Petra GlaviÄa na Nacionalni progam visokega Å¡olstva 2006-2010 [Comments by Prof. Dr. Petr GlaviÄ on the National Higher Education Program 2006-2010]. http://abra.fkkt.uni-lj.si/fn01leban/resolucija/7.doc
Grubelnik, V. (2011). Razvoj naravoslovnih kompetenc [Development of science competences]. http://kompetence.uni-mb.si/
Holcar, A. (2009). Ocenjevanje za uÄenje [Assessment for learning]. In M. Turk-Å kraba (Ed.), Didaktika ocenjevanja znanja. Vodenje procesa ocenjevanja za spodbujanje razvoja uÄenja (pp. 116–121). Zavod RS za Å¡olstvo.
Japelj Pavešić, B., Svetlik, K., & Kozina, A. (2012). Znanje matematike in naravoslovja med osnovnošolci v Sloveniji in po svetu, izlsedki raziskave TIMSS 2011 [Knowledge of mathematics and science among primary school students in Slovenia and worldwide, results of the 2011 TIMSS survey]. Pedagoški inštitut. https://www.pei.si/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/porocilo_timss11_celo.pdf
Jimenez, J. D., Lerch, J., & Bromley, P. (2017). Education for global citizenship and sustainable development in social science textbooks. European Journal of Education, 52(4), 460–476.
Johnstone, A. H. (1982). Macro- and Micro-chemistry. School Science Review, 64, 377–379.
Johnston, N., & Salaz, A. M. (2019). Exploring the reasons why university students prefer print over digital texts: An Australian perspective. Journal of the Australian Library and Information Association, 68(2), 126–145.
Kalin, J. (2004). Vloga medijev pri sodobnem pouku in presojanje njihove uÄinkovitosti [The role of media in modern lessons and the judgment of their efficiency]. In M. BlažiÄ (Ed.), Media in Education (pp. 210–215). Higher Education Centre.
King, C. J. H. (2010). An analysis of misconception in science textbooks: Earth science in England and Wales. International Journal of Science Education, 32(5), 565–601. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690902721681
Kopnina, H. (2020). Education for the future? Critical evaluation of education for sustainable development goals. The Journal of Environmental Education, 51(4), 280–291.
Laçin Şimşek, C. (2011). Investigation of environmental topics in the science and technology curriculum and textbooks in terms of environmental ethics and aesthetics. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 11(4), 2252–2257.
Lane, J., & Wilke, R. (1994). Environmental education in Wisconsin: A teacher survey. The Journal of Environmental Education, 24(4), 9–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.1994.9941959
Lau, K. H., Lam, T., Kam, B. H., Nkhoma, M., Richardson, J., & Thomas, S. (2018). The role of textbook learning resources in e-learning: A taxonomic study. Computers & Education, 118, 10–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.11.005
Lemke, J. L. (1998). Multiplying meaning: Visual and verbal semiotics in scientific text. In J. R. Martin & R. Veel (Eds.), Reading Science: Critical and Functional Perspectives on Discourses of Science (pp. 87–113). Routledge.
MartÃnez-Gracia, M. V., Gil-Quilez, M. J., & Osada, J. (2006). Analysis of molecular genetics content in Spanish secondary textbooks. Journal of Biological Education, 40(2), 35–60. https://doi.org/10.1080/00219266.2006.9656014
Martin, O. M., Mullis, V. I., Foy, P., & Stanco, M. G. (2011). TIMSS 2011 international results in science. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement, The Netherlands.
Mayer, R. E. (1993). Illustrations that instruct. In R. Glaser (Ed.), Advances in instructional psychology (pp. 253–284). Erlbaum.
Mayer, R. E. (1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist, 32(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep3201_1
Mulvik, I., Pribuišis, K., Siarova, H., Vežikauskaite, J., Sabaliauskas, E., Tasiopoulou, E., Gras- Velazquez, A., Bajorinaite, M., Billon, N., Fronza, V., Disterheft, A., & Finlayson, A. (2021). Education for environmental sustainability: policies and approaches in European Union Member States. Final Report. European Commission. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication--/-/publication/a193e445-71c6-11ec-9136-01aa75ed71a1
Peacock, A., & Gates, S. (2000). Newly qualified primary teachers’ perceptions of the role of text material in teaching science. Research in Science & Technological Education, 18(2), 155–171. https://doi.org/10.1080/713694982
Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45(3), 255–287.
Quinn, F., Elliott, S., Taylor, N., & Littledyke, M. (2015). Education for sustainability in primary science education. In N. Taylor, F. Quinn, & C. Eames (Eds.), Educating for Sustainability in Primary Schools (pp. 91–119). Teaching for the Future. Sense Publishers.
Rauch, F., & Steiner, R. (2013). Competences for education for sustainable development in teacher education. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 3(1), 9–24. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.248
Rebolj, N., & Devetak, I. (2012). Teachers’ opinion about the development of environmental competences in primary school. In M. Orel (Ed.), EDUvision 2012 Modern Approaches to Teaching Coming Generation (pp. 497–506). EDUvision.
Reed, S. K. (2010). Cognition: Theories and application (8th ed.). Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Regulation of Textbook Approval. (2015). Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia, 2nd paragraph (no. 34/15 and 27/17). http://www.pisrs.si/Pis.web/pregledPredpisa?id=PRAV12484#
Rieckmann, M., Mindt, L., & Gardiner, S. (2017). Education for Sustainable Development Goals: Learning Objectives. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000247444
Reid, D. J., Briggs, N., & Beveridge, M. (1983). The effect of pictures upon the readability of a school science topic. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 53(3), 327–335. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8279.1983.tb02565.x
Roberts, K., Benson, A., & Mills, J. (2021). E-textbook technology: Are instructors using it and what is the impact on student learning?. Journal of Research in Innovative Teaching & Learning, 14(3), 329–344.
Roczen, N. (2011). Environmental competence: the interplay between connection with nature and environmental knowledge in promoting ecological behavior. [Doctoral dissertatino (Research TU/e/ Graduation TU/e), Industrial Engineering and Innovation Sciences]. Technische Universiteit Eindhoven. https://doi.org/10.6100/IR719557
Shalgimbekova, K., Eremeeva, O., & Pronkin, N. (2023). How the teacher’s choice of e-textbook affects the primary school students’ performance?. Education And Information Technologies, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-023-11937-9
Stará, J., Chvál, M., & Starý, K. (2017). The role of textbooks in primary education. E-Pedagogium, 17(4), 60–69.
Sternberg, R. J. (2003). Cognitive theory (3rd ed.). Thomson Wadsworth.
Stylianidou, F., Ormerod, F., & Ogborn, J. (2002). Analysis of Science Textbook Pictures about Energy and Pupils’ readings of them. International Journal of Science Education, 24(3), 257 283. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690110078905
Å orgo, A., ÄŒeh, B., & Slavinec, M. (2013). Aktivno v naravoslovje 2. UÄbenik za naravoslvje v 7. razredu osnovne Å¡ole [Active in the science 2. Science textbook for 7th grade of primary school]. DZS.
Šorgo, A., Dojer, B., Golob, N., Repnik, R., Repolusk, S., Pesek, I., ... & Špur, N. (2018). Opinions about STEM content and classroom experiences as predictors of upper secondary school students‘ career aspirations to become researchers or teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(10), 1448–1468.
Å orgo, A., Glažar, S. A., & Slavinec, M. (2012). Aktivno v naravoslovje 1. UÄbenik za naravoslvje v 6. razredu osnovne Å¡ole [Active in the science 1. Science textbook for 6th grade of primary school]. DZS.
Å traus, M., Repež, M., & Å tigl, S. (2007). Program mednarodne primerjave dosežkov uÄencev – OECD PISA - Naravoslovni, bralni in matematiÄni dosežki slovenskih uÄencev. Nacionalni center PISA. PedagoÅ¡ki inÅ¡titut [Program for International Student Assessment - OECD PISA - Slovenian students’ performance in science, reading and mathematics. National PISA Center. Pedagogical Institute]. https://www.pei.si/wp-content/uploads/2018/12/PISA2006NacionalnoPorocilo.pdf
Tome, S., Ravnjak, B., Glažar, S.A. & Repnik, R. (2016). Ste jo videli že, srno?. Naravoslovje za 7. razred osnovne šole [Have you seen her yet, the doe?. Science textbook for 7th grade of primary school]. Modrijan.
Torkar, G., Devetak, I., & KoviÄ, M. (2012). Dotik narave 6. UÄbenik za naravoslovje v 6. razredu osnovne Å¡ole [Touch of Nature 6. Science textbook for 6th grade of primary school]. Rokus Klett.
Wade, R. & Eland, W. (1995). Connections, rewards, and challenges. National Society for Experiential Education Quarterly, 21(1), 4–5.
Yurtsever, N., & Angın, D. E. (2022). Examining the mediating role of altruism in the relationship between empathic tendencies, the nature relatedness, and environmental consciousness. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 12(1), 217–239.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitted article, which will be published online in the Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal (for short: CEPS Journal) by University of Ljubljana Press (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education, Kardeljeva ploščad 16, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). The Author’s/Authors’ name(s) will be evident in the article in the journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in the hands of the publisher.
- The Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit themselves to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
