Assessment Accommodations for Foreign Pupils in the Light of Educational Justice: Empirical Research among Slovenian Primary School Teachers
Abstract
The starting points of primary school pupils in a foreign country differ significantly from those of native pupils. In Slovenia, the knowledge of pupils who are foreign citizens (foreign pupils) may be assessed with different accommodations for no more than two years. The presented research conducted on a representative sample of 697 Slovenian primary school teachers addresses their perspectives, using a questionnaire, on assessment accommodations for foreign pupils. The following research questions are answered: 1) What are teachers' perceptions of assessment accommodations for foreign pupils; are there differences between teachers who had recently taught foreign pupils and those who had not? 2) Do generalist teachers have different perceptions than subject teachers do? 3) What kind of assessment accommodations do teachers practice for these pupils after the expiration of the two-year period; do generalist and subject teachers act differently? 4) Do teachers perceive assessment accommodations as being just? We demonstrate that teachers who have recent experience of teaching foreign pupils are more aware of the need for assessment accommodations than those who do not. The majority of the teachers accommodate assessment and grading even after the two-year period, especially generalist teachers. Additionally, some of them have lower expectations with regard to achieving knowledge standards for these pupils. While the majority of the teachers perceive accommodated assessment as being just, they are unsure of whether the period of allowed adjustments should be longer. This raises the questions about teachers' understanding of educational justice and the application of the principle of justice in practice.
Downloads
References
Bobbio, N. (1995). Eguaglianza e libertà . Torino: Einaudi.
Kodelja, Z. (2006). O praviÄnosti v izobraževanju [On Juctice in Education]. Ljubljana: Krtina.
KovaÄ Å ebart, M., & Krek, J. (2009). Justice in the Assessment of Knowledge: The Opinions of Teachers and Parents. In A. KozÅ‚owska & J. MurÅ¡ak (Eds.), Poland, Slovenia, the World: Challenges of Present-day Education (pp. 193–207). Krakow: Andrzej Frycz Modrzewski Krakow University: Krakow Society for Education.
Levels, M., & Dronkers, J. (2008). Educational Performance of Native and Immigrant Children from Various Countries of Origin. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 31(8), 1404–1425.
MedveÅ¡, Z. (2002). Nova paradigma praviÄnosti v Å¡oli [The New Paradigm of Juctice in School]. Sodobna pedagogika, 53(5), 24–41.
Meuret, D. (2001). School Equity as a Matter of Justice. In W. Hutmacher, D. Cochrane & N. Bottani (Eds.), In Pursuit of Equity in Education: Using International Indicators to Compare Equity Policies (pp. 93–111). New York, Boston, Dordrecht, London, Moscow: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
OECD (2010). PISA 2009 Results: What Students Know and Can Do – Student Performance in Reading, Mathematics and Science (Volume I). Paris: OECD Publishing.
Perelman, C. (1963). The Idea of Justice and the Problem of Argument. New York: The Humanities Press.
Rawls, J. (1999). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Scott, S., Webber, C. F., Lupart, J. L., Aitken, N., & Scott, D. E. (2014). Fair and Equitable Assessment Practices for All Students. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 21(1), 52–70.
Å ori, I., Å uÅ¡teriÄ, N., & Gaber, S. (2011). Immigrant Students’ Achievements in Croatia, Serbia and Slovenia in Context. CEPS Journal, 1(3), 31–50.
Webber, C. F., & Lupart, J. (2011). Leading Intercultural inclusive schools: An International Perspective. International Studies in Educational Administration, 39(1), 3–18.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitted article, which will be published online in the Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal (for short: CEPS Journal) by University of Ljubljana Press (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education, Kardeljeva ploščad 16, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). The Author’s/Authors’ name(s) will be evident in the article in the journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in the hands of the publisher.
- The Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit themselves to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
