University Assessment in the Age of Excessive Normativity: Examining Academic Professionalism and the Roles of Teachers and Students
Abstract
Universities in Spain, as well as globally, are currently witnessing a surge in regulations covering all aspects of operation, including teaching, learning and assessment. The present paper endeavours to explore the repercussions of excessive regulations on the roles of educators and students. It examines how these prescriptions pose a threat to academic freedom, faculty agency and teaching professionalism. The analysis is based on an examination of institutional assessment-related institutional policy documents from eight Catalan universities. The documents reveal a disconnect between the expectations surrounding the professionalism and agency of academics and the prescribed directives, which often leave room for interpretation by those tasked with their implementation. The documents also shed light on the perception of an escalating centralisation of control over strategies that can enhance student learning. This raises questions about the autonomy and professional judgment of educators when selecting the instructional methods that are best suited to and most advantageous for their students.
Downloads
References
Adie, L. E., Willis, J., & Van der Kleij, F. M. (2018). Diverse perspectives on student agency in classroom assessment. Australian Educational Researcher, 45(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13384-018-0262-2
Akalu, G. A. (2016). Higher education ‘massification’ and challenges to the professoriate: Do academics’ conceptions of quality matter?. Quality in Higher Education, 22(3), 260–276.
Autonomous University of Barcelona (UAB). (2022). Academic regulations of the studies at the Autonomous University of Barcelona. Retrieved June 15, 2023, from https://www.uab.cat/web/la-uab/itineraris/normatives/normativa-academica-1345668305783.html
Banta, T. W., Jones, E. A., & Black, K. E. (2009). Designing effective assessment: Principles and profiles of good practice. John Wiley & Sons.
Boud, D. (2000). Sustainable assessment: Rethinking assessment for the learning society. Studies in continuing education, 22(2), 151–167.
Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative research journal, v9(2), 27–40.
Brown, G. T. L., & Harris, L. R. (2013). Student self-assessment. In J. McMillan (Ed.), The SAGE handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. 367–393). SAGE.
Cardno, C. (2018). Policy document analysis: A practical educational leadership tool and a qualitative research method. Educational Administration: Theory & Practice, 24(4), 623–640.
Carless, D. (2017). Scaling up assessment for learning: Progress and prospects. In D. Carless, S. Bridges, C. Chan, & R. Glofcheski (Eds.), Scaling up assessment for learning in higher education. The enabling power of assessment, vol. 5, (pp. 3–17). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978981-10-3045-1_1
Clegg, S., & Smith, K. (2010). Learning, teaching and assessment strategies in higher education: Contradictions of genre and desiring. Research Papers in Education, 25(1), 115–132. https://doi.org/10.1080/02671520802584145
Cochran-Smith, M. (2021) Rethinking teacher education: The trouble with accountability. Oxford Review of Education, 47(1), 8–24. https://doi.org/0.1080/03054985.2020.1842181
Conference of Rectors. (2020). Informe sobre Procedimientos de Evaluación no Presencial. Estudio del Impacto de su Implantación en las Universidades Españolas y Recomendaciones [Report on non-faceto-face assessment procedures. Study of the impact of their implementation in Spanish universities and recommendations]. Grupo de Trabajo Intersectorial de CRUE Universidades Españolas.
del Castillo, J. M., & del Castillo, A. (2021). El impacto de la CoVId-19 en el profesorado de educación superior y sus concepciones sobre la evaluación [The impact of Covid-19 on higher education teachers and their conceptions about evaluation]. Campus Virtuales, 10(1), 89–101.
Díez Gutiérrez, E. J. (2010). La globalización neoliberal y sus repercusiones en educación [Neoliberal globalisation and its impact on education]. REIFOP-Revista Electrónica Interuniversitaria de Formación del Profesorado, 13(2), 23–38.
Díez Gutiérrez, E. J., & Bernabé-Martínez, C. (2021). La libre elección educativa neoliberal frente a la concepción de la educación como un bien común y público [Neoliberal educational free choice versus the conception of education as a common and public good]. Revista de Educación, 395, 211–236.
Dinsmore, D. L., & Wilson, H. E. (2016). Student participation in assessment: Does it influence self-regulation? In G. T. L Brown, & L. R. Harris (Eds.), Handbook of human and social conditions in assessment (pp. 145–168). Routledge.
Dunlop, C. (2014). The possible experts: How epistemic communities negotiate barriers to knowledge use in ecosystems services policy. Environment and Planning C – Government Policy, 32(2), 208–228.
Evans, A. M. (2011). Governing student assessment: Administrative rules, silenced academics and performing students. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 36(2), 213–223. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602930903277727
Evans, L. (2008). Professionalism, professionality and the development of education professionals. British Journal of Educational Studies, 56(1), 20–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8527.2007.00392.x
Foucault, M. (1984). The ethics of the concern of the self as a practice of freedom. In P. Rabinow (Ed), Ethics. Essential works of Foucault 1954-1984. Vol. 1 (pp. 281–301). Penguin Group.
Gaber, S., & Tašner, V. (2021). Structural over-determination of education reforms and agency. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 11(2), 77–95.
Godłów-Legiędź, J. (2021). On the academic freedom in the times of crisis of liberal democracy. Ekonomia i Prawo/Economics and Law, 20(4), 731–743. https://doi.org/10.12775/EiP.2021.043
Hammersley-Fletcher, L., & Qualter, A. (2009). From schools to higher education – Neoliberal Agendas and implications for autonomy. Journal of Educational Administration and History, 41(4), 363–375. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220620903211570
Han, B. C. (2014). Psicopolítica. Neoliberalismo y nuevas técnicas de poder [Psychopolitics. Neoliberalism and new techniques of power]. Herder editorial.
Harris, S. (2005). Rethinking academic identities in neo-liberal times. Teaching in Higher Education, 10(4), 421–433. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510500238986
Hutchings, P., Huber, M. T., & Ciccone, A. (2011). The scholarship of teaching and learning reconsidered: Institutional integration and impact. John Wiley & Sons.
Jankowski, N., & Provezis, S. (2012). Neoliberal ideologies, governmentality and the academy: An examination of accountability through assessment and transparency. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 46(5), 475–487.
Jaspers, K. (1959). The idea of the university. Peter Owen.
Jayadeva, S., Brooks, R., & Abrahams, J. (2021). The (stereo)typical student: How European higher education students feel they are viewed by relevant others. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 43(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2021.2007358
Jedemark, M., & Londos, M. (2021). Four different assessment practices: How university teachers handle the field of tension between professional responsibility and professional accountability. Higher Education, 81, 1293–1309. https://doi-org.sire.ub.edu/10.1007/s10734-020-00612-4
Jenkins, G. (2020). Teacher agency: The effects of active and passive responses to curriculum change. The Australian Educational Researcher, 47(1), 167–181.
Kolsaker, A. (2008). Academic professionalism in the managerialist era: A study of English Universities. Studies in Higher Education, 33(5), 513–525.
Luengo, J., & Molina-Pérez, J. (2019). Construyendo la resistencia profesional en un espacio educativo neoliberalizado [Building professional resilience in a neoliberalised educational space]. Educatio Siglo XXI, 37(1), 91–112.
Luengo, J., & Saura, G. (2012). Mecanismos endógenos de privatización encubierta en la escuela pública. Políticas educativas de gestión de resultados y rendición de cuentas en Andalucía [Endogenous mechanisms of covert privatisation in public schools. Educational policies for results management and accountability in Andalusia]. Profesorado. Revista de currículum y formación del profesorado, 16(3), 111–126.
Macfarlane, B. (2021). Why choice of teaching method is essential to academic freedom: A dialogue with Finn. Teaching in Higher Education, 29(2), 536–548. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2021.2007473
Madaus, G. F., & O’Dwyer, L. M. (1999). A short history of performance assessment. Lessons learned. Phi Delta Kappa, 80(9), 688–695.
Morrissey, J. (2013). Governing the academic subject: Foucault, governmentality and the performing university. Oxford Review of Education, 39(6), 797–810. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2013.860891
Moutsios, S. (2013). The de-Europeanization of the university under the Bologna process. Thesis Eleven, 119(1), 22–46. https://doi.org/10.1177/0725513613512198
Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199- 218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090
O’Leary, M., & Wood, P. (2018). Reimagining teaching excellence: Why collaboration, rather than competition, holds the key to improving teaching and learning in higher education. Educational Review, 71(1), 122–139. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2019.1524203
Olssen, M. (2009). Neoliberalism, education, and the rise of a global common good. In M. Simons, M. Olssen, & M. A. Peters (Eds.), Re-reading education policy: A handbook studying the policy agenda of the 21st century (pp. 433–457). Sense Publishers.
Open University of Catalonia (UOC). (2013). Academic regulations of the Open University of Catalonia applicable to EHEA university studies. Retrieved June 15, 2023, from https://seuelectronica.uoc.edu/content/dam/eoffice/docs/ca/Normativa_acadxmica_EEES_CAT_consolidada.pdf
Panadero, E., Broadbent, J., Boud, D., & Lodge, J. M. (2019). Using formative assessment to influence self-and co-regulated learning: The role of evaluative judgement. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 34, 535–557.
Panadero, E., Fraile, J. A., Ruiz, J., Castilla-Estévez, D., & Ruiz, M. A. (2019). Spanish university assessment practices: Examination tradition with diversity by faculty. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 44(3), 379–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1512553
Panadero, E., Jonsson, A., & Botella, J. (2017). Effects of self-assessment on self-regulated learning and self-efficacy: Four meta-analyses. Educational Research Review, 22, 74–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.08.004
Polytechnic University de Catalunya (UPC). (2022). Regulations for bachelor’s and master’s studies at UPC, academic year 2022-2023. Retrieved June 15, 2023, from https://www.upc.edu/sga/ca/normatives/NormativesAcademiques
Pompeu Fabra University (UPF). (2018). Official studies academic regulations. Retrieved June 15, 2023, from https://seuelectronica.upf.edu/normativa-academica-d-estudis-oficials
Raaper, R. (2016). Academic perceptions of higher education assessment processes in neoliberal academia. Critical Studies in Education, 57(2), 175–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/17508487.2015.1019901
Raaper, R. (2017). Tracing assessment policy discourses in neoliberalised higher education settings, Journal of Education Policy, 32(3), 322–339. http://doi.org/10.1080/02680939.2016.1257160
Rider, S. (2018). Truth, democracy and the mission of the university. In Bengtsen, S., Barnett, R. (Eds.), The Thinking University. Debating Higher Education: Philosophical Perspectives, vol 1 (pp. 15–29). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-77667-5_2
Rodríguez-Gómez, G. R., Ibarra-Sáiz, M. S. I., & García-Jiménez, E. G. (2013). Autoevaluación, evaluación entre iguales y coevaluación: conceptualización y práctica en las universidades españolas [Self-assessment, peer assessment and co-assessment: Conceptualisation and practice in Spanish universities]. Revista de investigación en educación, 2(11), 198–210.
Sadler, D. R. (2011). Academic freedom, achievement standards and professional identity. Quality in Higher Education, 17(1), 85–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/13538322.2011.554639
Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. Sage.
Stenalt, M. H., & Lassesen, B. (2022). Does student agency benefit student learning? A systematic review of higher education research. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 47(5), 653–669. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1967874
Tomlinson, M. (2017). Student perceptions of themselves as ‘consumers’ of higher education. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 38(4), 450–467. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2015.1113856
Universitat Rovira i Virgili (URV). (2021). Academic regulations for bachelor and master’s degrees. Retrieved June 15, 2023, from https://www.urv.cat/media/upload/arxius/normatives/propia/activitat_universitaria/docencia_estudi/2021-22_NA_GM.pdf
University of Barcelona (UB). (2020). Academic regulations of the studies at the University of Barcelona. Retrieved June 15, 2023, from http://www.ub.edu/acad/noracad/
University of Girona (UdG). (2020). Regulatory norms governing student evaluation and qualification processes. Retrieved June 15, 2023, from https://www.udg.edu/ca/estudia/Tramits-normatives-i-preus/Normatives/Processos-avaluacio-i-qualificacio-dels-estudiants
University of Lleida (UdL). (2014). Regulations for evaluation and teaching qualification in undergraduate and master’s degrees at UdL. Retrieved June 15, 2023, from http://www.udl.cat/export/sites/universitat-lleida/ca/udl/norma/.galleries/docs/Ordenacio_academica/Normativa-davaluacio-iqualif.-graus-i-masters-modif-CG-27-4-16.pdf
Watermeyer, R., Shankar, K., Crick, T., Knight, C., McGaughey, F., Hardman, J., Suri, V. R., Chung, R. S., & Phelan, D. (2021). ‘Pandemia’: A reckoning of UK universities’ corporate response to COVID-19 and its academic fallout. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 42(5–6), 651–666. https://doi.org/10.1080/01425692.2021.1937058
Willis, J., McGraw, K., & Graham, L. (2019). Conditions that mediate teacher agency during assessment reform. English Teaching: Practice & Critique, 18(2), 233–248.
Winstone, N. E., Nash, R. A., Parker, M., & Rowntree, J. (2017). Supporting learners’ agentic engagement with feedback: A systematic review and a taxonomy of recipience processes. Educational Psychologist, 52(1), 17–37.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitted article, which will be published online in the Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal (for short: CEPS Journal) by University of Ljubljana Press (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education, Kardeljeva ploščad 16, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). The Author’s/Authors’ name(s) will be evident in the article in the journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in the hands of the publisher.
- The Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit themselves to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
