Live What You Teach & Teach What You Live: Student Views on the Acceptability of Teachers’ Value-Related Statements about Sustainability and Climate Change
Abstract
This paper presents the results of a survey among pre-service and inservice students of pre-school education and students of environmental sciences on the acceptability of value-laden statements made by their teachers on issues of sustainable development and climate change. Fifteen statements were provided, and students had to choose among the options »acceptable statement«, »unacceptable statement« and »cannot decide«. The questionnaire was completed by 139 students from two universities in Slovenia. The results show that the students expect their teachers to promote the principles of sustainable development. The majority of students considered any teacher’s statement that would cast doubt on the cause or the necessity to act against climate change to be unacceptable. Teacher’s statements emphasising global issues that have, or could have, a direct impact on developed countries (e.g. climate change) received higher support than those global questions that more heavily impact underdeveloped or developing countries (e.g. poverty, child labour, access to natural resources). In the conclusion, it is emphasised that teachers should assist students in developing their own moral positions on complex issues such as sustainable development and climate change. Structured discussion techniques, such as a panel discussion, forum and debate, should be regularly and carefully implemented into lectures at the university level.
Downloads
References
Clayton, S., & Myers, G. (2009). Conservation Psychology: understanding and promoting human care for nature. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.
Dewey, J. (1997). How we think. Boston: DC Heath & Co. New York: Dover Publications Inc.
Dietz, T., Fitzgerald, A., & Shwom, R. (2005). Environmental values. Annual Review of Environmental Resources, 30, 335–372.
Jacobson, S. K., McDuff, M. D., & Monroe, M. C. (2006). Conservation education and outreach techniques. New York: Oxford University Press, Inc.
Karp, D. G. (1996). Values and their effect on pro-environmental behavior. Environment and Behaviour, 28(1), 111–133.
Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behaviour? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260.
Korfiatis, K. J. (2005). Environmental education and the science of ecology: exploration of an uneasy relationship. Environmental Education Research, 11(2), 235–248.
Krasko, G. L. (2004). This Unbearable Boredom of Being: A crisis of meaning in America. New York: iUniverse.
Mulder, K. F. (2010). Don’t preach. Practice! Value laden statements in academic sustainability education. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 11(1), 74–85.
Nordlund, A. M., & Garvill, J. (2002). Value structures behind pro-environmental behavior. Environment and Behavior, 34(6), 740–756.
Olson, E. C., Bowman, M., & Roth, R. (1984). Interpretation and non-formal environmental education in natural resources management. Journal of Environmental Education, 15(4), 6–10.
Palmer, J. (1995). Influences of pro-environmental practices. In J. Palmer, W. Goldstein, & A. Curnow (Eds.), Planning education to care for the earth (pp. 3–8). Gland, Switzerland & Cambridge: IUCN.
Palmer, J., & Neal, P. (1994). The Handbook of Environmental Education. London: Routledge.
Raskin, P., Banuri, T., GallopÃn, G., Gutman, P., Hammond, A. et al. (2002). Great Transition: The Promise and Lure of the Times Ahead. Boston: Stockholm Environment Institute.
Rokeach, M. (1973). The Nature of Human Values. New York: Free Press.
Prokop, P., Kubiatko, M., & FanÄoviÄová, J. (2008). Slovakian Pupils’ Knowledge of, and Attitudes toward, Birds. Anthrozoös, 21(3), 221–235.
Schultz, P. W., Gouveia, V. V., Cameron, D. L., Tankha, G., Schmuck, P., & Franek, M. (2005). Values and their relationship to environmental concern and conservation behavior. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36(4), 457–475.
Schultz, P. W., & Zelezny, L. (1999). Values as predictors of environmental attitudes: evidence for consistency across 14 countries. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 19(3), 255–265.
Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (pp. 1–65). San Diego: Academic Press.
Selby, D. (2007). As the heating happens: Education for Sustainable Development or Education for Sustainable Contraction? International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 2(3–4), 249–267.
Thøgersen, J., & Ölander, F. (2002). Human values and the emergence of a sustainable consumption pattern: A panel study. Journal of Economic Psychology, 23, 605–630.
Torkar, G. (2009). UÄiteljeve vrednote in njihov odnos do okolja in varstva narave [Teacher’s values and relationship with environment and nature protection]. Didactica Slovenica – PedagoÅ¡ka obzorja, 24(1), 97–108.
Torkar, G. (2010). How to set a good example to pupils?: Teachers’ purpose in life and behavioural intentions to protect nature. In S. Dolinšek (Ed.), XIV. IOSTE Socio-cultural and human values in science and technology education: proceedings. Symposium, International Organization for Science and Technology Education, June 13–18 2010, Bled, Slovenia. Ljubljana: Institute for Innovation and Development of University.
Torkar, G., Mohar, P., Gregorc, T., Nekrep, I., & Hönigsfeld AdamiÄ, M. (2010). The conservation knowledge and attitudes of teenagers in Slovenia toward the Eurasian Otter. International Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 5(3), 341–352.
Volk, T. L., & MacBeth, B. (1998). Environmental literacy in the U.S.: What should be...what is...getting from here to there. Rock Springs, GA: North American Association for Environmental Education.
von Blottnitz, H. (2006). Promoting active learning in sustainable development: experiences from a 4th year chemical engineering course. Journal of Cleaner Production, 14(9–11), 916–923.
Wals, A. E. J. (2007). Social learning towards a more sustainable world. Principles, perspectives, and praxis. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitted article, which will be published online in the Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal (for short: CEPS Journal) by University of Ljubljana Press (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education, Kardeljeva ploščad 16, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). The Author’s/Authors’ name(s) will be evident in the article in the journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in the hands of the publisher.
- The Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit themselves to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.