“Do not touch it!†Today’s Children’s Visual Competencies in Comparison with the Pre-Digital Era in Light of their Art Educational Environment
Abstract
The task of twenty-first century art education is to contribute to the blossoming of the child’s personality. In this article, I approach this challenge from two principal directions, both of which provide a window onto unfamiliar terrain. This project sought to answer the following research questions: How do plastic, spatial (3D) creative capacities develop, and how do they compare with the kindergarten’s accustomed advancement of picture-creating, planar (2D) capabilities? How do kindergartners’ skills as measured in the 1970s compare with those of kindergartners today? A follow-on project examined children’s skills in the context of built environment education, asking the questions: Where, and with whom, do children find the best conditions for creation and arts education? What kinds of environments are most favourable? The results showed a clear deterioration of children’s drawing development from 1974 until today, as well as from drawings in both studies to modelling today. However, a more promising discovery was that depictions of movement appear much sooner in the case of plastic arts works than in drawings. This opens the way to an orientation that in our increasingly urbanised world, can help our children grow into adults who responsibly shape our environment, sensitive to their own age, as self-possessed problem solvers, employing the toolkit of education through art. The study is based on ongoing, long-term research of the 3612+ Visual Skills Lab group, employing both qualitative and quantitative methods to evaluate the artistic proficiencies of nearly a thousand children, mostly aged 3–7, in dozens of kindergartens in Hungary, through hands-on exercises as well as surveys of teachers, parents and other interested parties.
Downloads
References
Bodóczky, I. (2000). Az értékelés problémái a vizuális nevelésben [The problems of assessment in visual education]. Iskolakultúra, 10(6-7), 15.
Bodóczky, I. (2003). Vizuális nevelés [Visual education]. Magyar Iparművészeti Egyetem.
Bodor, P. (Ed.) (2013). Szavak, képek, jelentés. KvalitatÃv kutatási olvasókönyv [Words, pictures, meaning: Qualitative research reader]. L’Harmattan.
Golomb, C. (1974). Young children’s sculpture and drawing – A study in representational development. Harvard University Press.
Guba, A., Pataky, G., & Tóth, E. (2017). ÉpÃtett környezeti nevelés az óvodában [Built environment education in the kindergarten]. Magyar ÉpÃtész Kamara, kultúrAktÃv.
Inspectorate of Education / Ministry of Culture and Science [Inspectie van het Onderwijs / Ministerie van Cultuur en Wetenschap]. (2017). Rapport Peil. Kunstzinnige oriëntatie 2015–2016 [The Peil Report. Artistic orientation 2015–2016]. https://www.onderwijsinspectie.nl/documenten/rapporten/2017/03/27/rapport-kunstzinnige-orientatie
Kárpáti, A., & Pataky, G. (2016). A közös európai vizuális műveltség referenciakeret [The European framework of reference for visual literacy]. A Neveléstudomány folyóirat, Új perspektÃvák a művészetpedagógiában, 1, 6–21. http://nevelestudomany.elte.hu/index.php/2016/04/a-kozos-europai-vizualis-muveltseg-referenciakeret/
Katona, F. (2001). „Az öntudat újraébredése†A humán idegrendszer ontogenesise [“The reawakening of consciousnessâ€: The ontogenesis of the human nervous system]. Medicina Könyvkiadó.
Kirchner, C., & Kirschenmann, J. (2015). Kunst unterrichten. Didaktische Grundlagen und schülerorientierte Vermittlung [Teaching art: Didactic foundations and pupil-oriented mediation]. Friedrich Verlag.
Lakatos B., M. (2007). „Kör, kör, ki játszikâ€. Mire tanÃtanak a népi játékok? [“Circle, circle, who is playing?†What do folk games teach us?]. In I. Bollókné Panyik (Ed.), Gyermek-, Nevelés-, Pedagógusképzés (pp. 103–116). Trezor Kiadó. http://vmek.oszk.hu/09100/09191/09191.pdf
Mitchell, W. J. T. (1994). Picture theory: Essays on verbal and visual representation. University of Chicago Press.
Mitchell, W. J. T. (2004). What do pictures want? The lives and loves of images. University of Chicago Press.
OECD. (2005). The definition and selection of key competencies. Executive summary. www.oecd.org/edu/statistics/deseco-OLSAT
Paál, Ã. (1970). A gyermekrajzok fejlÅ‘désének motivációi [The motivations for the development of children’s drawings]. Magyar Pszichológiai Szemle, 27(4), 373–378.
Pataky, G. (2011). Object making and design in the visual education of children aged 6–12 in the light of a diagnostic survey. In A. Kárpáti & E. Gaul (Eds.), InSEA World Congress (pp. 182–193). HATA.
Pataky, G. (2012). Vizuális képességek fejlÅ‘dése 6-12 éves korban, a tárgykultúra tanÃtásának területén [The development of visual skills at the age of 6–12 years in the field of teaching object making]. ELTE TÓK.
Pataky, G. (2016). Nutzung des Kompetenzstrukturmodells in der Forschung – Dokumentation eines Vorhabens in Ungarn [The use of the competence structure model in the research – Documentation of a project in Hungary]. In E. Wagner & D. Schönau (Eds.), Cadre Europ.en Commun de Référence pour la Visual Literacy (pp. 372–379). Waxmann.
Pataky, G. (2017a). Plasztikai képességek fejlÅ‘dése 3–7 éves korban a CEFR_VL kompetenciamodell tükrében. Diagnosztikus vizsgálat a sÃkbeli (2D) és a térbeli (3D) alkotások körébÅ‘l a vizuális nevelés rendszerében [Plastic skills development from age 3 to 7 years in the mirror of the CEFR_VL Competence Model. Diagnostic study of 2D and 3D creations within the structure of visual education]. Gyermeknevelés, 5(1), 171–187. http://old.tok.elte.hu/gyermekneveles/17_1_szam/pub/pataky.pdf
Pataky, G. (2017b). Nicht anfassen! Veränderung der zeichnerischen und plastischen Fähigkeiten von Kinder im Vergleich von heute mit 1974 [Hands off! Changes in drawing and plastic skills of today’s children in comparison with the ones in 1974]. Werkspuren 2. https://werkspuren.ch/
Pataky, G., & Rekvényi, V. (2017). How is the optimal art education space created in the digital era? Art education research in the light of teacher training students’ critical views in two European countries (Hungary and Scotland). 35th InSEA World Congress, Daegu, Korea. http://www.insea2017.org/download/InSEA2017_ProgramBooK.pdf
Reulecke, W., & Rollett, B. (1976). Pädagogische Diagnostik und lernzielorientiertes Tests [Pedagogical diagnostics and learning goal-oriented tests]. In K. Pawlik (Ed.), Diagnose und Diagnostik (pp. 179–185). Klett.
Szőkéné Halász, É. (2010). Pszichológiai és pedagógiai ismeretek [Psychological and pedagogical knowledge]. http:/www.humantiszk.hu/modularis_jegyzetek/6_1_szokene.pdf
Tóth, E., & Pataky, G. (2019). Why architecture and the built environment matters in art education. In M. Kallio-Tavin & O. Sushchenko (Eds.), Scientific and Social interventions in art education 2 (pp. 29–35). Special Issue of InSEA Congress 2018. https://wiki.aalto.fi/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=148283892
Wagner, E., & Schönau, D. (Eds.) (2016). Cadre Europen Commun de Référence pour la Visual Literacy – Prototype.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitted article, which will be published online in the Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal (for short: CEPS Journal) by University of Ljubljana Press (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education, Kardeljeva ploščad 16, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). The Author’s/Authors’ name(s) will be evident in the article in the journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in the hands of the publisher.
- The Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit themselves to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
