The Teaching of Initial Multiplication Concepts and Skills in Croatian Textbooks
Abstract
The goal of this paper is to describe the teaching of initial multiplication concepts and skills, up to the multiplication table, in the Croatian educational system. As Stiegler and Hiebert (1999) concluded, teaching is a complex system rooted in a cultural script of a given society. To describe it without ignoring certain features of it that appear to be self-evident to an insider, it is necessary to step out of this cultural frame. For that reason, we study the teaching of initial multiplication in Croatia by comparing Croatian mathematical textbooks with textbooks from Singapore, Japan, and England. For the textbook analysis, we adapt the framework of Charalambous, Delaney, Hsu, and Mesa that examines a textbook as an environment for the construction of knowledge of a single mathematical concept. The analysis provides evidence that practice and automation are at the centre of the initial learning of multiplication in Croatia. The meaning of multiplication usually is not clear, and pupils are not provided additional tools for developing understanding, nor they are encouraged to use different calculation strategies in a flexible manner. The study also indicates that Croatian textbooks present mathematics as a practice that is closed and pre-given, restricted to the one and the only right way through it.
Downloads
References
Anghileri, J. (1989). An investigation of young children’s understanding of multiplication. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 20(4), 367–385. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00315607
Baković, T., Trupčević, G., & Valent, A. (2019). Treatment of initial multiplication in textbooks from Croatia and Singapore. In Z. Kolar-Begović, R. Kolar-Šuper, & Lj. Jukić Matić (Eds.), Towards new perspectives on mathematics education (pp. 216–228). Element.
Bell, A., Fischbein, E., & Greer, B. (1984). Choice of operation in verbal arithmetic problems: The effects of number size, problem structure and context. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 15(2), 129–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00305893
Boaler, J. (2016). Mathematical mindsets: Unleashing students' potential through creative math, inspiring messages, and innovative teaching. Jossey-Bass.
Boonlerts, S., & Inprasitha, M. (2013). The textbook analysis on multiplication: The case of Japan, Singapore and Thailand. Creative Education, 4(4), 259–262. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2013.44038
Charalambous, C. Y., Delaney, S., Hsu, H.-Y., & Mesa, V. (2010). A comparative analysis of the addition and subtraction of fractions in textbooks from three countries. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 12(2), 117–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/10986060903460070
Clark, F. B., & Kamii, C. (1996). Identification of multiplicative thinking in children in grades 1–5. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 27(1), 41–51. https://doi.org/10.2307/749196
Department for Education [DfE]. (2013). Mathematics programmes of study: Key stages 1 and 2. National curriculum in England. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/335158/PRIMARY_national_curriculum_-_Mathematics_220714.pdf
Fan, L., & Kaeley, G. S. (2000). The influence of textbooks on teaching strategies: An empirical study. Mid-Western Educational Researcher, 13(4), 2–9.
Fan, L., Zhu, Y., & Miao, Z. (2013). Textbook research in mathematics education: Development status and directions. ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(5), 633–646. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0539-x
Fischbein, E., Deri, M., Nello, M. S., & Marino, M. S. (1985). The role of implicit models in solving verbal problems in multiplication and division. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 16(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.2307/748969
Fosnot, C. T., & Dolk, M. (2001). Young mathematicians at work: Constructing multiplication and division. Heinemann.
Foong, P. Y., Chang, S. H., Lim, L. G. P., & Wong, O. H. (2014). Primary mathematics 1B. Shinglee.
Foong, P. Y., Chang, S. H., Lim, L. G. P., & Wong, O. H. (2015). Primary mathematics 3A. Shinglee.
Foong, P. Y., Lim, L. G. P., & Wong, O. H. (2014). Primary mathematics 2A. Shinglee.
Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine.
Glasnović Gracin, D., & Domović, V. (2009). Upotreba matematičkih udžbenika u nastavi viših razreda osnovne škole [The use of mathematics textbooks in teaching of upper primary grades]. Odgojne znanosti, 18(2), 45–65. https://hrcak.srce.hr/48441
Glasnović Gracin, D., & Jukić Matić, Lj. (2016). The role of mathematics textbooks in lower secondary education in Croatia: An empirical study. The Mathematics Educator, 16(2), 31–58.
Greer, B. (1992). Multiplication and division as models of situations. In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 276–295). Macmillan.
Haggarty, L., & Pepin, B. (2002). An investigation of mathematics textbooks and their use in English, French and German classrooms: Who gets an opportunity to learn what? British Educational Research Journal, 28(4), 567–590. https://doi.org/10.1080/0141192022000005832
Hong, D. S., & Choi, K. M. (2014). A comparison of Korean and American secondary school textbooks: The case of quadratic equations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 85(2), 241–263. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-013-9512-4
Isoda, M. (Ed.). (2010). Elementary school teaching guide for the Japanese course of study mathematics (Grade 1-6). CRICED, University of Tsukuba. https://www.criced.tsukuba.ac.jp/math/apec/ICME12/Lesson_Study_set/Elementary_School_Teaching_Guide-Mathematics-EN.pdf
Jones, K., & Fujita, T. (2013). Interpretations of national curricula: The case of geometry in textbooks from England and Japan. ZDM Mathematics Education, 45(5), 671–683. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-013-0515-5
Jukić Matić, Lj. (2019). The teacher as a lesson designer. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 9(2), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.722
Kheong, F. H., Ramakrishnan, C., & Choo, M. (2014). My pals are here maths 2A. MC Education.
Kheong, F. H., Ramakrishnan, C., & Choo, M. (2015). My pals are here maths 3A. MC Education.
Kheong, F. H., Ramakrishnan, C., & Wah, B. L. P. (2013). My pals are here maths 1B. MC Education.
Kolar, V. M., Hodnik Čadež, T., & Vula, E. (2018). Primary teacher students’ understanding of fraction representational knowledge in Slovenia and Kosovo. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 8(2), 71–96. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.342
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitted article, which will be published online in the Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal (for short: CEPS Journal) by University of Ljubljana Press (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education, Kardeljeva ploščad 16, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). The Author’s/Authors’ name(s) will be evident in the article in the journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in the hands of the publisher.
- The Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit themselves to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
