Plagiatorstvo v raziskovalnih poročilih indijskih doktorskih študentov: vzroki in akcijski načrt za izboljšavo problematike
Povzetek
Številne ugledne akademske revije so umaknile raziskovalna dela indijskih raziskovalcev zaradi plagiatorstva. University Grant Commission (t. i. Univerzitetna komisija za štipendije), reprezentativna organizacija indijske vlade, si močno prizadeva zagotoviti akademsko integriteto z uporabo strogih smernic. Namen te študije je poiskati morebitne vzroke in oblikovati akcijske načrte za izboljšavo problematike kot odziv na plagiatorstvo v raziskovalnih poročilih indijskih doktorskih študentov. Opravili smo pregled literature, da bi našli primere plagiatorstva v izobraževalnih ustanovah. Na podlagi spoznanj iz pregleda smo izvedli anketo, da bi opredelili, kako ozaveščeni so o plagiatorstvu doktorski študentje, ter vključili tudi vzroke in akcijske načrte za izboljšavo problematike. Poleg tega smo opravili 21 intervjujev z vodilnimi akademiki in s strokovnjaki iz različnih akademskih disciplin, da bi razumeli njihova stališča. Analizirali smo odgovore, ki smo jih prejeli z vprašalniki in intervjuji. Rezultati so pokazali, da je plagiatorstvo zelo razširjeno, in osvetlili vzroke zanj. Poleg tega je iz študije izšel akcijski načrt za izboljšavo problematike, ki je vključeval: 1) ustanovitev komisije za raziskovalno etiko na vseh akademskih ali raziskovalnih ustanovah; 2) spodbujanje pravilnega razumevanja plagiatorstva in njegovih posledic z izvajanjem usposabljanj, delavnic in kampanj ozaveščanja v zgodnji fazi statusa doktorskih študentov; 3) zagotavljanje jasnosti raziskovalnega namena pri doktorskih študentih in poudarek na kakovosti raziskovalnega dela; 4) razvoj veščin akademskega pisanja; 5) omogočanje brezplačne uporabe programske opreme proti plagiatorstvu za vse študente in člane fakultete. Indijski študentje so stroge smernice University Grant Commission (Univerzitetne komisije za štipendije) za univerzitetne štipendije razumeli kot dobro pobudo, vendar pa jih ni mogoče uspešno izvajati, če se ne odpravijo temeljni vzroki za plagiatorstvo.Prenosi
Literatura
Badrinath, H., & Prakash, I. (2016). Academic integrity and plagiarism: A case study, 3rd National Conference on Electronic Theses & Dissertations Gandhi Nagar, India.
Chaddah, P. (2014). Pursuing knowledge creation, India needs a policy n ‘plagiarism cells’. Current Science, 106, 349.
Dhammi, I. K., & Ul Haq, R. (2016). What is plagiarism and how to avoid it? Indian Journal of Orthopaedics, 50(6), 581–583. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.193485
Đurišić, M., & Bunijevac, M. (2017). Parental involvement as an important factor for successful education. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 7(3), 137–153.
Ehrich, J., Howard, S. J., Mu, C., & Bokosmaty, S. (2016). A comparison of Chinese and Australian university students' attitudes towards plagiarism. Studies in Higher Education, 41(2), 231–246.
Farooq, R., & Sultana, A. (2022). Measuring students' attitudes toward plagiarism. Ethics & Behavior, 32(3), 210–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508422.2020.1860766
Frandsen, T. F. (2019). Why do researchers decide to publish in questionable journals? A review of the literature. Learned Publishing, 32(1), 57–62.
Garanayak, S., & Ramaiah, C. K. (2019). Predatory journals publishing trend in India: A study. University News, 57(38), 11–18.
Gopinath, N. M., John, J., Senthilkumar, E., & Nagappan, N. (2014). Knowledge awareness and attitude about research ethics among dental faculties in India. The Journal of Contemporary Dental Practice, 15(5), 608–613. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1587
Gradišek, P. (2012). Character strengths and life satisfaction of Slovenian in-service and pre-service teachers. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 2(3), 167–180.
Handa, N., & Power, C. (2005). Land and discover! A case study investigating the cultural context of plagiarism. Journal of University Teaching Learning Practice, 2(3), 8.
Harris, R. (2001). The plagiarism handbook: Strategies for preventing, detecting, dealing with plagiarism. Pyrczak Publishing.
Hegde, A., & Patil, N. (2021). Predatory publishing in India: Has the system failed us? Acta Neurochirurgica, 163(1), 9–10.
Iftikhar, F. (2022, May 26). UGC considers scrapping rule on publishing research for PhD. The Hindustan Times. https://www.hindustantimes.com/india-news/ugc-considers-scrapping-rule-onpublishing-research-for-phd-101653503189014.html
Javaid, S. T., Sultan, S., & Ehrich, J. F. (2021). Contrasting first and final year undergraduate students' plagiarism perceptions to investigate anti-plagiarism measures. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 13(2), 561–576. https://doi.org/10.1108/JARHE-04-2020-0080
Kadam, D. (2018). Academic integrity and plagiarism: The new regulations in India. Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery, 51(2), 109–110. https://doi.org/10.4103/ijps.IJPS_208_18
Kanchan, T., Menezes, R. G., & Kalthur, S. G. (2010). “Unintentional” self-plagiarism. The American Journal of Forensic Medicine and Pathology, 31(4), e10. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAF.0b013e3181ff6225
Kent, C. K., & Salim, N. (2010, September 28–30). Web based cross language plagiarism detection. Second International Conference on Computational Intelligence, Modelling and Simulation, Bali, Indonesia.
Khairnar, M. R., Wadgave, U., Shah, S. J., Shah, S., Jain, V. M., & Kumbhar, S. (2019). Survey on attitude of dental professionals about plagiarism in Maharashtra, India. Perspectives in clinical research, 10(1), 9–14. https://doi.org/10.4103/picr.PICR_141_17
Kumari, M. P., & Lakshmi, S. (2015). Awareness on plagiarism among research scholars of Sri Venkateswara University: A study. IOSR Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 20(3), 55–59.
Kumari, R., Langer, B., Singh, P., Kumar Gupta, R. K., Sharma, P., & Gupta, R. (2018). Exploring attitude toward research and plagiarism among faculty members and senior residents in a medical school of North India: A cross-sectional study. International Journal of Medical Science and Public Health, 7(4), 255–260.
Lahiry, S., & Sinha, R. (2019). Creativity is intelligence having fun, originality an undetected plagiarism! Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology and Leprology, 85(4), 436–438.
Ma, H. J., Wan, G., & Lu, E. Y. (2008). Digital cheating and plagiarism in schools. Theory Into 208 plagiarism in the research reports of indian doctoral students Practice, 47(3), 197–203. https://doi.org/10.1080/00405840802153809
Mavrinac, M., Brumini, G., Bilić-Zulle, L., & Petrovecki, M. (2010). Construction and validation of attitudes toward plagiarism questionnaire. Croatian Medical Journal, 51(3), 195–201. https://doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2010.51.195
Mills, D., & Inouye, K. (2021). Problematizing ‘predatory publishing’: A systematic review of factors shaping publishing motives, decisions, and experiences. Learned Publishing, 34(2), 89–104.
Misra, D. P., Ravindran, V., & Agarwal, V. (2017). Plagiarism: Software-based detection and the importance of (human) hardware. Indian Journal of Rheumatology, 12(4). https://journals.lww.com/ijru/Fulltext/2017/12040/Plagiarism_Software_based_Detection_and_the.2.aspx
Mondal, S., & Mondal, H. (2018). Google search: A simple and free tool to detect plagiarism. Indian Journal of Vascular Endovascular Surgery, 5(4), 270.
Mukherjee, I., Kumar, B., Singh, S., & Sharma, K. (2018). Plagiarism detection based on semantic analysis. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning, 12(3), 242-254.
Mustofa, K., & Sir, Y. A. (2013). Early-detection system for cross-language (translated) plagiarism. In Information and Communication Technology: International Conference, ICT-EurAsia 2013, Yogyakarta, Indonesia.
Naik, R. R., Landge, M. B., & Mahender, C. N. (2015). A review on plagiarism detection tools. International Journal of Computer Applications, 125(11).
Padmanabhan, S. (2017). Self-plagiarism-self goal. Journal of Indian Orthodontic Society, 51(3),145–146.
Pallela & Talari (2016, October 20–22). Plagiarism: a serious ethical issue for Indian students. IEEE International Symposium on Technology and Society (ISTAS), Kollam, India.
Pandita, R., & Singh, S. (2019). Regulations to prevent plagiarism in higher education in India: A critical appraisal. DESIDOC Journal of Library and Information Technology, 39(2).
Parikh, T. (2021). Begin from the beginning: The need for reimagining and retelling myths in children's books. International Journal of Humanities, Art and Social Studies, 3(1), 1–8. https://flyccs.com/jounals/IJHASS/paper/Ijhas.vol8.pdf
Pathak, N. N. & Malakar, K. (2016). Use of anti plagiarism software for detection of plagiarism in research work in the North East Region with special reference to Gauhati University. 10th Convention PLANNER-2016, North-Eastern Hill University Shillong, Meghalaya.
Patwardhan, B. (2019a). India strikes back against predatory journals. Nature, 571(7). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/d41586-019-02023-7
Patwardhan, B. (2019b). Why India is striking back against predatory journals. Nature, 571(7763), 7–8.
Patwardhan, B., & Nagarkar, S. (2021). The UGC-CARE initiative: Indian academia's quest for research and publishing integrity. First Monday, 26(10).
Patwardhan, B., & Thakur, A. (2019). UGC-CARE initiative to promote research quality, integrity and publication ethics. Current Science, 117(6), 918–919.
Pradhan, B., & Pradhan, A. (2017). Dealing with plagiarism in scholarly communication. International Journal of Library and Information Studies, 7(3), 67–73.
Prasad, R. (2019, July 13). 127 papers from India retracted for image duplication, manipulation. The Hindu. https://www.thehindu.com/sci-tech/science/127-papers-from-india-retracted-for-imageduplication-manipulation/article61596015.ece
Priyadarshini, S. (2018). India targets universities in predatory-journal crackdown. Nature, 560(7719), 537-539.
Pushkar (2015, June 5). In India, you can plagiarize and flourish. The Wire. https://thewire.in/education/in-india-you-can-plagiarize-and-flourish
Pushkar (2018, September 6). UGC's anti-plagiarism rules don't make room for realities of Indian academia. The Wire. https://thewire.in/education/in-india-you-can-plagiarize-and-flourish
Rao, K. R. (2008). Plagiarism, a scourge. Current Science, 94(5), 581–586. http://www.jstor.org/stable/24100297
Šorgo, A., & Heric, J. (2020). Motivational and demotivational factors affecting a teacher's decision on whether to do research. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 10(3), 77–97.
Šorgo, A., Vavdi, M., Cigler, U., & Kralj, M. (2015). Opportunity makes the cheater: High school students and academic dishonesty. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 5(4), 67–87.
Sharma, B. B., & Singh, V. (2011). Ethics in writing: Learning to stay away from plagiarism and scientific misconduct. Lung India, 28(2).
Steen, R. G. (2011). Retractions in the scientific literature: Is the incidence of research fraud increasing? Journal of Medical Ethics, 37(4), 249. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2010.040923
Sureda-Negre, J., Calvo-Sastre, A., & Comas-Forgas, R. (2022). Predatory journals and publishers: Characteristics and impact of academic spam to researchers in educational sciences. Learned Publishing.
Thakur, S., & Lahiry, S. (2019). Research ethics in the modern era. Indian Journal of Dermatology, Venereology, Leprology, 85(4), 351.
Thomas, S. P. (2020). No laughing matter: Proliferation of predatory journals. Issues in Mental Health Nursing, 41(4), 269-270. https://doi.org/10.1080/01612840.2020.1720448
Tlitova, A., Toschev, A., Talanov, M., & Kurnosov, V. (2020). Meta-analysis of cross-language plagiarism and self-plagiarism detection methods for Russian-English language pair [Systematic Review]. Frontiers in Computer Science, 2(42). https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2020.523053
Varghese, J., & Jacob, M. (2015). Do medical students require education on issues related to plagiarism? Indian Journal of Medical Ethics, 12(2), 82-87. https://doi.org/10.20529/ijme.2015.026
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitted article, which will be published online in the Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal (for short: CEPS Journal) by University of Ljubljana Press (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education, Kardeljeva ploščad 16, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). The Author’s/Authors’ name(s) will be evident in the article in the journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in the hands of the publisher.
- The Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit themselves to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
