Opolnomočenje nadzornikov za odgovorno raziskovalno ravnanje pri nadzoru prek spletnega tečaja: pilotna študija
Povzetek
Nadzor in mentorstvo sta zelo pomembna vidika raziskovalne integritete. Kodeksi ravnanja, kot je kodeks ravnanja ALLEA, določajo, kako pomembno je usposabljanje raziskovalcev za dobro izvajanje raziskav in kakšno vlogo ima nadzor pri preprečevanju nesprejemljivih raziskovalnih praks. Nizozemski kodeks ravnanja na primer izrecno navaja, da so univerze odgovorne za omogočanje usposabljanja o raziskovalni integriteti. Razvili smo tečaj za nadzornike, ki obravnava njihovo odgovornost in vlogo pri usposabljanju raziskovalcev, ki so na začetku kariere, na področju raziskovalne integritete. V tem prispevku je opisano, kakšna baza dokazov je bila uporabljena za oblikovanje tega tečaja in kako tečaj doživljajo nadzorniki, ki so sodelovali pri njegovem poskusnem izvajanju v začetku leta 2022. Na tečaj se je v fazi testiranja prijavilo 147 udeležencev; sedemnajst jih je pridobilo certifikat. Glavna spoznanja, ki izhajajo iz izkušenj s tem tečajem in literature, so: 1) tečaje za nadzornike je treba prilagoditi majhni količini časa, ki si ga nadzorniki lahko razporedijo za udeležbo na teh tečajih, ter vsebino in naloge prilagoditi njihovim potrebam; 2) spletni tečaji naj bodo zelo privlačni, vendar jih je treba kombinirati s 3) srečanjem v živo, da bi jih motivirali za pravočasno dokončanje tečaja in mogoče s tem tudi pomagali omogočanje skupne refleksije z izmenjavo osebnih izkušenj.Prenosi
Literatura
Abdi, S., Pizzolato, D., Nemery, B., & Dierickx, K. (2021). Educating PhD students in research integrity in Europe. Science and engineering ethics, 27(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-021-00290-0
ALLEA. (2017). The European Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. https://allea.org/code-of-conduct/
Bird, S. (2001). Mentors, Advisors and Supervisors: Their Role in Teaching Responsible Research Conduct. Science and Engineering Ethics, 7(4), 455–468. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-001-0002-1
Burroughs Wellcome Fund & Howard Hughes Medical Institute (2006). Making the Right Moves: A Practical Guide to Scientific Management for Postdocs and New Faculty. Retrieved September 11, 2023, from https://www.hhmi.org/sites/default/files/Educational%20Materials/Lab%20Management/Making%20the%20Right%20Moves/moves2.pdf
Clynes, M., Corbett, A., Overbaugh, J. (2019). Why We Need Good Mentoring, Nature Reviews Cancer, 19(9), 489–493. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41568-019-0173-1
DeTora, L. M., Carey, M. A., Toroser, D., & Baum, E. Z. (2019). Ghostwriting in biomedicine: a review of the published literature. Current Medical Research and Opinion, 35(9), 1643–1651. https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2019.1608101
Dilemma Game. Erasmus University Rotterdam. (n.d.). https://www.eur.nl/en/about-eur/policy-and-regulations/integrity/research-integrity/dilemma-game
Dumford, A. D., & Miller, A. L. (2018). Online learning in higher education: exploring advantages and disadvantages for engagement. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 30(3), 452–465. https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2019.1608101
Filius, R. M., Kleijn, R. A. D., Uijl, S. G., Prins, F. J., Rijen, H. V. V., & Grobbee, D. E. (2018). Challenges concerning deep learning in SPOCs. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 10(1–2), 111–127. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTEL.2018.088341
Fisher, C. B., Fried, A. L., Goodman, S. J., & Germano, K. K. (2009). Measures of mentoring, department climate, and graduate student preparedness in the responsible conduct of psychological research. Ethics & Behavior, 19(3), 227–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508420902886726
Freire, P. (2000). Pedagogy of the oppressed (30th-anniversary ed.). Continuum.
Gasparič, R. P. (2017). Jonathan Bergmann and Aaron Sams, Flipped Learning: Gateway to Student Engagement, International Society for Technology in Education: Eugene, Oregon and Washington, DC, 2014; 169 pp.: ISBN 978-1-56484-344-9. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 7(3), 173–176.
Gøtzsche PC, Kassirer JP, Woolley KL, Wager E, Jacobs A, Gertel A, et al. (2009) ‘What should be done to tackle ghostwriting in the medical literature?’ PLoS Med, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1000023
Gray, P. W., & Jordan, S.R. (2012). Supervisors and Academic Integrity: Supervisors as Exemplars and Mentors. Journal of Academic Ethics, 10(4), 299–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-012-9155-6
Guerin, C., & Green, I. (2015) “They’re the bosses”: feedback in team supervision. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 39(3), 320–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2013.831039
Guo, P., (2017) ‘MOOC and SPOC, which one is better?’ Eurasia Journal of Mathematical Sciences and Technology Education 13(8), 5961–5967. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.01044a
Harvey, L. A. (2018). Gift, honorary or guest authorship. Spinal Cord, 56(2), 91–91. https://doi-org.vu-nl.idm.oclc.org/10.1038/s41393-017-0057-8
Haven, T. L., de Goede, M. E. E., Tijdink, J. K., & Oort, F. J. (2019). Personally perceived publication pressure: revising the Publication Pressure Questionnaire (PPQ) by using work stress models. Research Integrity and Peer Review, 4(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-019-0066-6
Haven, T., Bouter, L., Mennen, L., & Tijdink, J. (2022). Superb supervision: A pilot study on training supervisors to convey responsible research practices onto their PhD candidates. Accountability in Research, 1-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2022.2071153
Haven, T., (2021) Towards a responsible research climate. Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam.
Kalichman, M.W., & Plemmons, D.K. (2018). Intervention to Promote Responsible Conduct of Research Mentoring. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24(2), 699–725. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-017-9929-8
Lokhtina, I., Löfström, E., Cornér, S., & Castelló, M. (2020). In pursuit of sustainable co-authorship practices in doctoral supervision: Addressing the challenges of writing, authorial identity and integrity. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 59(1), 82–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2020.1799839
Lerouge, I., & Hol, A. (2020). Towards a research integrity culture at universities: From recommendations to implementation. League of European Research Universities.
Löfström, E., & Pyhältö, K. (2019). What are ethics in doctoral supervision, and how do they matter? Doctoral students' perspective. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 64(4), 535–550. https://doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2019.1595711
Muthanna, A., & Alduais, A. (2020). A thematic review on Research Integrity and Research Supervision: Relationships, Crises and Critical Messages. Journal of Academic Ethics, 19(1), 95–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10805-020-09368-z
Netherlands Code of Conduct for Research Integrity. (2018). NWO. https://www.nwo.nl/en/netherlands-code-conduct-research-integrity
Pierson, E., Vora, V., Pells, R., Grove, J., Upton, B., Jack, P., & Ross, J. (2019, January 17). Third of PhD students in Europe “fail to complete in six years.” Times Higher Education (THE). https://www.timeshighereducation.com/news/third-phd-students-europe-fail-complete-six-years
Rathmell, W. K., Brown, N. J., & Kilburg, R. R. (2019). Transformation to academic leadership: The role of mentorship and executive coaching. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 71(3). https://doi.org/10.1037/cpb0000124
Roje, R., Reyes Elizondo, A., Kaltenbrunner, W., Buljan, I & Marušić, A. (2022). Factors influencing the promotion and implementation of research integrity in research performing and research funding organizations: a scoping review, Accountability in Research, 1-39. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989621.2022.2073819
Saqipi, B., & Vogrinc, J. (2020). The development of teacher research as a form of developing teacher pedagogical practice. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 10(3), 5-9.
Scherpenberg, C. van, Bultema, L., Jahn, A., Löffler, M., Minneker, V., & Lasser, J. (2021, March 28). Manifestations of power abuse in academia and how to prevent them. Elephant in the Lab. https://elephantinthelab.org/manifestations-of-power-abuse-in-academia-and-how-to-prevent-them
Schlossberg, P., & Cunningham, C. (2016). Diversity, instructional research, and online education. Communication Education, 65(2), 229-232. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2015.1098713
The Embassy of Good Science. (2022, November 29). Main Page. https://embassy.science/wiki/Main_Page
Theunissen, B., & van den Hoven, M. (2021). Taking RCR seriously in teaching scientific integrity. Bioethica Forum. https://doi.org/10.24894/bf.2021.14010
UK Data Service. (2023, January 5). Checklist. https://ukdataservice.ac.uk/learning-hub/research-data-management/plan-to-share/checklist/
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitted article, which will be published online in the Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal (for short: CEPS Journal) by University of Ljubljana Press (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education, Kardeljeva ploščad 16, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). The Author’s/Authors’ name(s) will be evident in the article in the journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in the hands of the publisher.
- The Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit themselves to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
