Razvijanje digitalne pismenosti bodočih učiteljev razrednega pouka z masovnim odprtim spletnim tečajem in s projektno zasnovanim učenjem
Povzetek
Prispevek obravnava implementacijo masovnega odprtega spletnega tečaja in projektno zasnovanega učenja kot pristopov za razvijanje digitalnihckompetenc bodočih učiteljev. Zasnova tečaja je temeljila na Evropskem okviru digitalnih kompetenc za državljane (DigComp). Raziskava vrednoti učinkovitost izvedenega masovnega odprtega spletnega tečaja in projektno zasnovanega učenja pri razvijanju digitalnih kompetenc ter analizira zadovoljstvo študentov z obema izobraževalnima oblikama. V raziskavi je v dveh študijskih letih sodelovalo 166 študentov. Opravljen masovni odprti spletni tečaj in projektne naloge so obvezni elementi predmeta IKT v izobraževanju. Študentje so tečaj opravili v spletni učilnici ter s pridobitvijo pozitivne ocene izkazali osnovno raven znanja in razumevanja. S projektno zasnovanim učenjem so razvijali digitalne kompetence na višjih kognitivnih ravneh. Ob koncu študijskega leta so bili zbrani anonimizirani odzivi o zadovoljstvu študentov z izvedbo učnih enot, s podporo mentorjev, prejetimi povratnimi informacijami ter z ocenjevanjem v okviru masovnega odprtega spletnega tečaja in projektnega dela. Izsledki kažejo na pomemben napredek v digitalnih spretnostih, zlasti na področju ustvarjanja digitalnih izobraževalnih vsebin. Raziskava prav tako poudarja visoko zadovoljstvo študentov z izvedbo pouka, mentorsko podporo in s povratnimi informacijami. Študentje so pozitivno ocenili tudi ocenjevanje v okviru projektno zasnovanega učenja, kar potrjuje učinkovitost tega pristopa. V zaključku so podana priporočila za izboljšanje izobraževalne prakse in spodbujanje razvoja digitalnih kompetenc študentov. Raziskava prispeva k razumevanju pomena vključevanja digitalne pismenosti v izobraževalne programe in ponuja usmeritve za oblikovanje učinkovitih pristopov za krepitev digitalne pismenosti, ki je ključna za pripravo študentov na prihodnje profesionalne izzive in aktivno državljanstvo v tehnološko napredni družbi.
Prenosi
Literatura
Admiraal, W., Schenke, W., De Jong, L., Emmelot, Y., & Sligte, H. (2019). Schools as professional learning communities: What can schools do to support professional development of their teachers? Professional Development in Education, 47(4), 684–698. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2019.1665573
Admiraal, W., van Vugt, F., Kranenburg, F., Koster, B., Smit, B., Weijers, S., & Lockhorst, D. (2016). Preparing pre-service teachers to integrate technology into K–12 instruction: Evaluation of a technology-infused approach. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 26(1), 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2016.1163283
Al-Busaidi, S., & Al-Seyabi, F. (2021). Project-based learning as a tool for student-teachers’ professional development: A study in an Omani EFL teacher education program. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 20(4), 116–136. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.4.7
Biggs, J. (2014). Constructive alignment in university teaching. HERDSA Review of Higher Education, 1, 5–22. https://www.tru.ca/__shared/assets/Constructive_Alignment36087.pdf
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2020). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
Chanpet, P., Chomsuwan, K., & Murphy, E. (2020). Online project-based learning and formative assessment. Technology, Knowledge and Learning, 25, 685–705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-018-9363-2
Chilla, S., Doetjes, G., Vogt, K., Abed Ibrahim, L., & Tsagari, D. (2025). Digital-inclusive transformation and teacher preparedness for foreign language education – A bilateral GermanNorwegian perspective. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 15(1), 83–124. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.1690
Dagarin Fojkar, M., & Berčnik, S. (2023). Academic writing in teaching research integrity. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 13(3), 129–154. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.1602
Deng, R., Benckendorff, P., & Gannaway, D. (2019). Progress and new directions for teaching and learning in MOOCs. Computers & Education, 129, 48–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2018.10.019
Eller, L. S., Lev, E. L., & Feurer, A. (2014). Key components of an effective mentoring relationship: A qualitative study. Nurse Education Today, 34(5), 815–820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2013.07.020
Falloon, G. (2020). From digital literacy to digital competence: The teacher digital competency (TDC) framework. Educational Technology Research and Development, 68(5), 2449–2472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-020-09767-4
Foulger, T. S., Graziano, K. J., Schmidt-Crawford, D., & Slykhuis, D. A. (2017). Teacher educator technology competencies. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 25(4), 413–448. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/322129355_Teacher_Educator_Technology_Competencies
Granado-Alcón, M. d. C., Gómez-Baya, D., Herrera-Gutiérrez, E., Vélez-Toral, M., Alonso-Martín, P., & Martínez-Frutos, M. T. (2020). Project-based learning and the acquisition of competencies and knowledge transfer in higher education. Sustainability, 12(23), Article 10062. https://doi.org/10.3390/su122310062
Gudmundsdottir, G. B., & Hatlevik, O. E. (2017). Newly qualified teachers’ professional digital competence: Implications for teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 41(2), 214–231. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2017.1416085
Guerra, A., Ulseth, R., & Kolmos, A. (Eds.). (2017). PBL in engineering education: International perspectives on curriculum change. Sense Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-905-8
Guo, P., Saab, N., Post, L. S., & Admiraal, W. (2020). A review of project-based learning in higher education: Student outcomes and measures. International Journal of Educational Research, 102(1), Article 101586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101586
Instefjord, E. J., & Munthe, E. (2017). Educating digitally competent teachers: A study of integration of professional digital competence in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 37–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.05.016
Janssen, N., Knoef, M., & Lazonder, A. W. (2019). Technological and pedagogical support for preservice teachers’ lesson planning. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 28(1), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/1475939X.2019.1569554
Jopp, R. (2019). A case study of a technology enhanced learning initiative that supports authentic assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 25(8), 942–958. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2019.1613637.
Kokotsaki, D., Menzies, V., & Wiggins, A. (2016). Project-based learning: A review of the literature. Improving Schools, 19(3), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365480216659733
Margaryan, A., Bianco, M., & Littlejohn, A. (2015). Instructional quality of massive open online courses (MOOCs). Computers & Education, 80, 77–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.005
Maros, M., Korenkova, M., Fila, M., Levicky, M., & Schoberova, M. (2021). Project-based learning and its effectiveness: Evidence from Slovakia. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(7), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1954036
McGarr, O., & McDonagh, A. (2020). Exploring the digital competence of pre-service teachers on entry onto an initial teacher education programme in Ireland. Irish Educational Studies, 40(1), 115–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/03323315.2020.1800501
Redecker, C. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators: DigCompEdu. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/159770
Ribeiro, S., Tavares, C., Lopes, C., & Chorão, G. (2023). Competence development strategies after COVID-19: Using PBL in translation courses. Education Sciences, 13(3), 283–283. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13030283
Rodriguez, O. (2013). The concept of openness behind c and x-MOOCs (massive open online courses). Open Praxis, 5(1), 67–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.5.1.42
Røkenes, F. M., & Krumsvik, R. J. (2016). Prepared to teach ESL with ICT? A study of digital competence in Norwegian teacher education. Computers & Education, 97, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.014
Salas-Rueda, R.-A., De-La-Cruz-Martínez, G., Alvarado-Zamorano, C., & Prieto-Larios, E. (2022). The collaborative wall: A technological means to improving the teaching-learning process about physics. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 12(4), 205–231. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.1167
Sánchez-Cruzado, C., Santiago Campión, R., & Sánchez-Compaña, M. T. (2021). Teacher digital literacy: The indisputable challenge after COVID-19. Sustainability, 13(4), Article 1858. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041858
Sokhanvar, Z., Salehi, K., & Sokhanvar, F. (2021). Advantages of authentic assessment for improving the learning experience and employability skills of higher education students: A systematic literature review. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 70, Article 101030. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.STUEDUC.2021.101030
Svoboda, P., Mynaříková, L. (2021). MOOC Courses as a tool for the development of digital competencies of teachers. In S. Nazir, T. Z. Ahram, & W. Karwowski (Eds.), Advances in human factors in training, education, and learning sciences. AHFE 2021. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 269. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80000-0_29
Tondeur, J., Braak, J. v., Siddiq, F., & Scherer, R. (2016). Time for a new approach to prepare future teachers for educational technology use: Its meaning and measurement. Computers & Education, 94, 134–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.009
Tondeur, J., Scherer, R., Baran, E., Siddiq, F., Valtonen, T., & Sointu, E. (2019). Teacher educators as gatekeepers: Preparing the next generation of teachers for technology integration in education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 50(3), 1189–1209. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12748
Vuorikari, R., Kluzer, S., & Punie, Y. (2022). DigComp 2.2: The digital competence framework for citizens - With new examples of knowledge, skills and attitudes. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/490274
Zhang, L., & Ma, Y. (2023). A study of the impact of project-based learning on student learning effects: A meta-analysis study. Frontiers in Psychology, 14(1), Article 1202728. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1202728
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitted article, which will be published online in the Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal (for short: CEPS Journal) by University of Ljubljana Press (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education, Kardeljeva ploščad 16, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). The Author’s/Authors’ name(s) will be evident in the article in the journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in the hands of the publisher.
- The Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit themselves to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
