Delovni viri in organizacijska zavezanost učiteljev: posredniška vloga delovne zavzetosti, izgorelosti in zadovoljstva z delom
Povzetek
Skladno z modelom delovnih zahtev in virov je bil cilj te študije preučiti razmerje med delovnimi viri in organizacijsko zavezanostjo učiteljev prek posredniške vloge delovne zavzetosti, izgorelosti in zadovoljstva z delom. Izvedena je bila presečna študija z uporabo naključnega vzorca 407 osnovnošolskih učiteljev iz Republike Hrvaške (94,8 % žensk; povprečna starost = 43,8 leta, standardna deviacija = 10,3). Izsledki kažejo, da so delovni viri neposredno povezani z višjo afektivno in normativno organizacijsko zavezanostjo, niso pa povezani z zavezanostjo k nadaljevanju dela. Analize posredovanja z uporabo makra PROCESS so pokazale, da so delovna zavzetost, izgorelost in zadovoljstvo z delom posredovali v odnosu med delovnimi viri in vsemi komponentami zavezanosti. Te ugotovitve so skladne s stališčem, da delovni viri prispevajo k zavzetosti učiteljev in njihovemu zadovoljstvu z delom, kar lahko posledično okrepi organizacijsko zavezanost. Študija razširja obstoječe raziskave modela delovnih zahtev in virov ter ponuja natančnejše razumevanje, kako so delovni viri povezani z različnimi oblikami organizacijske zavezanosti, ter potrjuje, da je zavezanost k nadaljevanju dela konceptualno in empirično drugačna oblika organizacijske zavezanosti v primerjavi z afektivno in normativno zavezanostjo.
Prenosi
Literatura
Ainley, J., & Carstens, R. (2018). Teaching and Learning International Survey (TALIS) 2018 conceptual framework, OECD education working papers, No. 187. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/799337c2-en
Altun, M. (2017). The effects of teacher commitment on student achievement. International Journal of Social Sciences & Educational Studies, 3(3), 51–54. https://doi.org/10.23918/ijsses.v3i3p51
Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The Job Demands–Resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22(3), 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940710733115
Bakker, A. B., Demerouti, E., & Sanz-Vergel, A. (2023). Job demands–resources theory: Ten years later. Annual review of organizational psychology and organizational behavior, 10(1), 25–53. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-120920-053933
Cabanilla, A. B., Pontillas, P. V., & Comon, J. D. (2024). Teachers’ commitment and their performance in Naawan District, Misamis Oriental. European Modern Studies Journal, 8(3), 259–289. https://doi.org/10.59573/emsj.8(3).2024.19
Collie, R. J., & Martin, A. J. (2017). Teachers’ sense of adaptability: Examining links with perceived autonomy support, teachers’ psychological functioning, and students’ numeracy achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 55, 29–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2017.03.003
Crawford, E. R., LePine, J. A., & Rich, B. L. (2010). Linking job demands and resources to employee engagement and burnout: A theoretical extension and meta-analytic test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(5), 834–848. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019364
D’Amico, A., Geraci, A., & Tarantino, C. (2020). The relationship between perceived emotional intelligence, work engagement, job satisfaction, and burnout in Italian school teachers: An exploratory study. Psihologijske teme [Psychological Topics], 29(1), 63–84. https://doi.org/10.31820/pt.29.1.4
De Jonge, J., & Hunter, F. F. (2021). Does match really matter? The moderating role of resources in the relation between demands, vigor and fatigue in academic life. The Journal of Psychology, 155(6), 548–570. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2021.1924603
Demerouti, E. (2025). Job demands-resources and conservation of resources theories: How do they help to explain employee well-being and future job design? Journal of Business Research, 192, Article 115296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2025.115296
Demerouti, E., Bakker, A. B., Vardakou, I., & Kantas, A. (2003). The convergent validity of two burnout instruments: A multitrait-multimethod analysis. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 19(1), 12–23. https://doi.org/10.1027/1015-5759.19.1.12
Gruszczynska, E., Basinska, B. A., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2021). Within-and between-person factor structure of the Oldenburg Burnout Inventory: Analysis of a diary study using multilevel confirmatory factor analysis. PLoS ONE, 16(5), Article e0251257. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251257
Harrison, M. G., King, R. B., & Wang, H. (2023). Satisfied teachers are good teachers: The association between teacher job satisfaction and instructional quality. British Educational Research Journal, 49(3), 476–498. https://doi.org/10.1002/berj.3851
Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76(4), 408–420. https://doi.org/10.1080/03637750903310360
Hom, P. W., Lee, T. W., Shaw, J. D., & Hausknecht, J. P. (2017). One hundred years of employee turnover theory and research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 102(3), 530–545. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000103
Hoque, K. E., Wang, X., Qi, Y., & Norzan, N. (2023). The factors associated with teachers’ job satisfaction and their impacts on students’ achievement: A review (2010–2021). Humanities & Social Sciences Communications, 10(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-023-01645-7
Jerrim, J. (2024). Are satisfied teacher better teachers? International evidence from the TALIS video study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 148, Article 104687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2024.104687
Kim, M., & Beehr, T. A. (2020). Empowering leadership: leading people to be present through affective organizational commitment? The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 31(16), 2017–2044. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2018.1424017
Knight, C., Patterson, M., & Dawson, J. (2019). Work engagement interventions can be effective: a systematic review. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 28(3), 348–372. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2019.1588887
Kotzé, M., & Nel, P. (2020). The influence of job resources on platinum mineworkers’ work engagement and organisational commitment: An explorative study. The Extractive Industries and Society, 7, 146–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2020.01.009
Lesener, T., Gusy, B., & Wolter, C. (2019). The job demands-resources model: A meta-analytic review of longitudinal studies. Work & Stress, 33(1), 76–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/02678373.2018.1529065
Lizano, E. L., & Barak, M. M. (2015). Job burnout and affective wellbeing: A longitudinal study of burnout and job satisfaction among public child welfare workers. Children and youth services review, 55, 18–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2015.05.005
Löfström, E., Poom-Valickis, K., & Rumma, K. (2026). Teachers’ metaphors and beliefs about teaching and their relationship with job satisfaction. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 16(1), 227–251. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.1768
Madigan, D. J., & Kim, L. E. (2021). Towards an understanding of teacher attrition: A meta-analysis of burnout, job satisfaction, and teachers’ intentions to quit. Teaching and Teacher Education, 105, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2021.103425
Mangundjaya, W. L., & Merdiaty, N. (2025). Does Job Satisfaction as a Predictor for Organizational Commitment. Journal of Law and Humanities Review, 1(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlhr.v1i1.384
Marušić, I., Šabić, J., & Matić Bojić, J. (2024). Perceived change in job demands and resources and teacher well-being during the pandemic. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 16(1), 207–226. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.1782
Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. (2017). Understanding burnout: new models. In C. L. Cooper & J. C. Quick (Eds.), The handbook of stress and health: A guide to research and practice (pp. 36–56). Wiley Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118993811.ch3
Merino, M. D., Privado, J., & Durán, R. (2021). Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS) adapted to work: Psychometric properties of the satisfaction with Work Scale (SWWS). Anales de Psicología, 37(3), 557–566. https://doi.org/10.6018/ANALESPS.430801
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1997). Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research, and application. Sage Publications.
Meyer, J. P., Allen, N. J., & Smith, C. A. (1993). Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(4), 538–551. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.4.538
Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., Herscovitch, L., & Topolnytsky, L. (2002). Affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization: A meta-analysis of antecedents, correlates, and consequences. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 61(1), 20–52. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.2001.1842
Meyer, J. P., Stanley, D. J., & Parfyonova, N. M. (2012). Employee commitment in context: The nature and implication of commitment profiles. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 80(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2011.07.002
Nagar, K. (2012). Organizational commitment and job satisfaction among teachers during times of burnout. Vikalpa, 37(2), 43–60. https://doi.org/10.1177/0256090920120205
Neuber, L., Englitz, C., Schulte, N., Forthmann, B., & Holling, H. (2021). How work engagement relates to performance and absenteeism: a meta-analysis. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 31(2), 292–315. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2021.1953989
Olčar, D., Rijavec, M., & Rogošić, S. (2023). Životni ciljevi i izgaranje kod hrvatskih osnovnoškolskih učitelja: Posrednička uloga osnovnih psiholoških potreba i zanesenosti na poslu [Life goals and burnout among Croatian primary school teachers: The mediating role of basic psychological needs and flow]. Metodički ogledi: časopis za filozofiju odgoja [Methodological Essays: Journal of Educational Philosophy], 30(2), 91–111. https://doi.org/10.21464/mo.30.2.7
Palma-Moreira, A., Dias, A. L., Pereira, B., & Au-Yong-Oliveira, M. (2024). Competence development and affective commitment as mechanisms that explain the relationship between organizational culture and turnover intentions. Administrative Sciences, 14(9), 223. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci14090223
Salanova, M., & Schaufeli, W. B. (2008). A cross-national study of work engagement as a mediator between job resources and proactive behaviour. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 19(1), 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585190701763982
Salvagioni, D. A. J., Melanda, F. N., Mesas, A. E., González, A. D., Gabani, F. L., & Andrade, S. M. (2017). Physical, psychological and occupational consequences of job burnout: A systematic review of prospective studies. PloS one, 12(10), Article e0185781. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185781
Schaufeli, W. B. (2017). Applying the Job Demands–Resources model: A ‘how to’ guide to measuring and tackling work engagement and burnout. Organizational Dynamics, 50(2), Article 100799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orgdyn.2017.04.008
Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V., & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: A two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies: An Interdisciplinary Forum on Subjective Well-Being, 3(1), 71–92. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1015630930326
Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2014). Teacher self-efficacy and perceived autonomy: Relations with teacher engagement, job satisfaction, and emotional exhaustion. Psychological Reports, 114(1), 68–77. https://doi.org/10.2466/14.02.PR0.114k14w0
Skaalvik, E. M., & Skaalvik, S. (2018). Job demands and job resources as predictors of teacher motivation and well-being. Social Psychology of Education: An International Journal, 21(5), 1251–1275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-018-9464-8
van Rossenberg, Y. G., Cross, D., & Swart, J. (2022). An HRM perspective on workplace commitment: Reconnecting in concept, measurement and methodology. Human Resource Management Review, 32(4), Article 100891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2021.100891
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education.
Zahed-Babelan, A., Koulaei, G., Moeinikia, M., & Rezaei Sharif, A. (2019). Instructional Leadership Effects on Teachers’ Work Engagement: Roles of School Culture, Empowerment, and Job Characteristics. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 9(3), 137–156. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.181
Zammitti, A., Russo, A., Magnano, P., & Guarnera, M. (2022). Work Engagement as a Moderating Factor between Positive Attitude toward Smart Working and Job and Life Satisfaction. European journal of investigation in health, psychology and education, 12(7), 781–791. https://doi.org/10.3390/ejihpe12070057
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitted article, which will be published online in the Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal (for short: CEPS Journal) by University of Ljubljana Press (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education, Kardeljeva ploščad 16, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). The Author’s/Authors’ name(s) will be evident in the article in the journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in the hands of the publisher.
- The Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit themselves to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
