Prilagoditev in validacija vprašalnika o poučevanju književnosti med učitelji albanskega jezika in književnosti ter angleščine kot tujega jezika v Severni Makedoniji

  • Jehona Rushidi-Rexhepi Faculty of Pedagogy, University of Tetova, North Macedonia
  • Kushtrim Ahmeti Faculty of Philosophy, University of Tetova, North Macedonia
  • Agon Memeti Faculty of Natural Sciences and Mathematics, University of Tetova, North Macedonia
  • Ibrahim Neziri Faculty of Philosophy, University of Tetova, North Macedonia
  • Bujar Adili Faculty of Pedagogy, University of Tetova, North Macedonia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.2371
Ključne besede: faktorska analiza, validacija instrumenta, jezikovni razvoj, poučevanje književnosti, zaznave učiteljev

Povzetek

Prepričanja učiteljev o pedagoški vrednosti literarnih besedil vplivajo na to, ali se ta vrednost v celoti uresničuje tudi v učilnici, vendar do zdaj ni bilo validiranega instrumenta za merjenje teh prepričanj pri učiteljih albanskega jezika in književnosti ter angleščine kot tujega jezika v Severni Makedoniji. V tej študiji smo prilagodili vprašalnik o poučevanju književnosti, ki sta ga razvila Duncan in Paran leta 2017, ter s potrditveno faktorsko analizo preverili njegovo štirifaktorsko strukturo na vzorcu 224 učiteljev. Na podlagi strukture pilotne raziskave z 29 postavkami so bile postavke z najšibkejšimi standardiziranimi faktorskimi utežmi druga za drugo izločene skladno z enotnim, vnaprej določenim postopkom, tako da je nastal štirifaktorski model (relevantnost besedila, jezikovna ustreznost, praksa učitelja, dosežki učencev) z 18 postavkami, ki se je dobro prilegal podatkom in imel zadovoljivo zanesljivost na podlestvicah in v celoti. Preizkušanje merilne invariantnosti med učitelji albanskega jezika in književnosti ter angleščine kot tujega jezika je potrdilo konfiguracijsko in metrično invariantnost (primerljiva struktura in faktorske uteži), ne pa tudi skalarne invariantnosti (različne konstante postavk). Ti izsledki potrjujejo, da je vprašalnik o poučevanju književnosti v tem kontekstu psihometrično zanesljiv instrument.

Prenosi

Podatki o prenosih še niso na voljo.

Literatura

Ayre, C., & Scally, A. J. (2014). Critical values for Lawshe’s content validity ratio: Revisiting the original methods of calculation. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 47(1), 79–86.

Benić, M. Ž. (2021). Translation and validation of the Kaufman domains of creativity scale on a Croatian sample of early childhood and preschool education students. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 11(3), 163–179.

Boateng, G. O., Neilands, T. B., Frongillo, E. A., Melgar-Quiñonez, H. R., & Young, S. L. (2018). Best practices for developing and validating scales for health, social, and behavioral research: A primer. Frontiers in Public Health, 6, Article 149. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2018.00149

Bobkina, J., & Stefanova, S. (2016). Literature and critical literacy pedagogy in the EFL classroom: Towards a model of teaching critical thinking skills. Studies in Second Language Learning and Teaching, 6(4), 677–696.

Borg, S. (2003). Teacher cognition in language teaching: A review of research on what language teachers think, know, believe, and do. Language Teaching, 36(2), 81–109. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444803001903

Byram, M. (2021). Teaching and assessing intercultural communicative competence: Revisited. Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781800410251

Byrne, B. M. (2016). Structural equation modeling with AMOS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming (3rd ed.). Routledge.

Calafato, R., & Hunstadbråten, S. (2024). Literature in language education: Exploring EFL learners’ literary competence profiles. English Teaching & Learning, 49(3), 537–559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42321-024-00193-w

Cheung, G. W., & Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9(2), 233–255. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5

Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2018). Research methods in education (8th ed.). Routledge.

Cunningham, B., & Farmer, A. (2016). An investigation of the relationships between teacher beliefs and student achievement: Teacher beliefs. The International Journal of Educational Organization and Leadership, 23(2), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.18848/2329-1656/CGP/v23i02/1-14

DeVellis, R. F., & Thorpe, C. T. (2021). Scale development: Theory and applications. Sage Publications.

Duncan, S., & Paran, A. (2017). The effectiveness of literature on acquisition of language skills and intercultural understanding in the high school context. UCL Institute of Education, University College London.

Duncan, S., & Paran, A. (2018). Negotiating the challenges of reading literature: Teachers reporting on their practice. In J. Bland (Ed.), Using literature in English language education: Challenging reading for 8–18 year olds (pp. 243–260). Bloomsbury Academic.

Gottardo, A., Mirza, A., Koh, P. W., Ferreira, A., & Javier, C. (2018). Unpacking listening comprehension: The role of vocabulary, morphological awareness, and syntactic knowledge in reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 31(8), 1741–1764. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9736-2

Hedgcock, J. S., & Ferris, D. R. (2018). Teaching readers of English: Students, texts, and contexts. Routledge.

Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118

Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.

Kovač, M., & Kepic Mohar, A. (2022). The changing role of textbooks in primary education in the digital era: What can we learn from reading research? Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 12(2), 11–27. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.1290

Lacko, D., Čeněk, J., Točík, J., Avsec, A., Đorđević, V., Genc, A., Haka, F., Šakotić-Kurbalija, J., Mohorić, T., Neziri, I., & Subotić, S. (2022). The necessity of testing measurement invariance in cross-cultural research: Potential bias in cross-cultural comparisons with individualism–collectivism self-report scales. Cross-Cultural Research, 56(2–3), 228–267. https://doi.org/10.1177/10693971211068971

Levine, S., Trepper, K., Chung, R. H., & Coelho, R. (2021). How feeling supports students’ interpretive discussions about literature. Journal of Literacy Research, 53(4), 491–515. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086296X211052249

Li, L. (2020). Language teacher cognition. Palgrave Macmillan UK.

Lohr, S. L. (2021). Sampling: Design and analysis (3rd ed.). Chapman & Hall/CRC.

Mart, Ç. T. (2018). Literature in language teaching: A recipe to maximize learning. L1-Educational Studies in Language and Literature, 18(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.17239/L1ESLL-2018.18.01.09

Milković, I., Cindrić, I., & Cvitanović, D. (2025). In search of authentic and adapted literary texts in textbooks for young learners of English as a foreign language. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, Article 1906. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.1906

Paran, A. (2008). The role of literature in instructed foreign language learning and teaching: An evidence-based survey. Language Teaching, 41(4), 465–496. https://doi.org/10.1017/S026144480800520X

Phipps, S., & Borg, S. (2009). Exploring tensions between teachers’ grammar teaching beliefs and practices. System, 37(3), 380–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2009.03.002

Ploj Virtič, M., Du Plessis, A., & Šorgo, A. (2023). Development and validation of the ‘Mentoring for Effective Teaching Practicum Instrument’. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 13(3), 233–260. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.1315

Putnick, D. L., & Bornstein, M. H. (2016). Measurement invariance conventions and reporting: The state of the art and future directions for psychological research. Developmental Review, 41, 71–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2016.06.004

Rathert, S., & Cabaroglu, N. (2022). Theorising textbook adaptation in English language teaching. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 12(2), 169–188. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.1287

Rushidi-Rexhepi J., Hamzai J., & Adili B. (2025). Literary texts and language development: Piloting a questionnaire among Albanian language and EFL teachers in North Macedonia. British Journal of Education, 13(10), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.37745/bje.2013/vol13n10114

Sa’d, S. H. T., & Eames, O. Q. (2021). A classroom survey of language teachers’ discriminatory practices against students: Causes, consequences and keys. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 11(1), 91–114. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.541

Scheaffer, R. L., Mendenhall, W., Ott, L., & Gerow, K. G. (2011). Elementary survey sampling (7th ed.). Cengage Learning.

State Statistical Office of the Republic of North Macedonia. (2024). Education and science. https://www.stat.gov.mk/oblastopsto.aspx?id=5

Taber, K. S. (2018). The use of Cronbach’s alpha when developing and reporting research instruments in science education. Research in Science Education, 48(6), 1273–1296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-016-9602-2

Objavljeno
2026-10-29
Kako citirati
Rushidi-Rexhepi, J., Ahmeti, K., Memeti, A., Neziri, I., & Adili, B. (2026). Prilagoditev in validacija vprašalnika o poučevanju književnosti med učitelji albanskega jezika in književnosti ter angleščine kot tujega jezika v Severni Makedoniji. Revija Centra Za študij Edukacijskih Strategij . https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.2371
Številka
2026: Recently Accepted Papers
Rubrike
VARIA

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitted article, which will be published online in the Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal (for short: CEPS Journal) by University of Ljubljana Press (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education, Kardeljeva ploščad 16, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). The Author’s/Authors’ name(s) will be evident in the article in the journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in the hands of the publisher.
  2. The Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit themselves to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
  3. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  4. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.