Jezikovna in matematična kompleksnost v besedilnih nalogah
Povzetek
Ta študija preučuje, kako jezikovna in matematična kompleksnost skupaj vplivata na uspešnost osnovnošolcev pri reševanju besedilnih nalog. 117 hrvaških učencev je opravilo preizkus, ki je vseboval štiri naloge, ki so se sistematično razlikovale po jezikovni in matematični kompleksnosti (preproste v nasprotju z zapletenimi). Učenci so ocenili tudi zaznano jezikovno kompleksnost vsake naloge. Opravili smo kvantitativne analize za preučitev razlik v uspešnosti, medsebojnih vplivov med stopnjami kompleksnosti in korelacij z ocenami učencev, kar se tiče kompleksnosti. Ugotovitve kažejo vzorec medsebojnega vpliva med jezikovno in matematično kompleksnostjo. Učenci so najbolje opravili naloge s preprosto matematično strukturo, kar kaže na to, da nizke matematične zahteve zmanjšujejo vpliv jezikovne kompleksnosti. Kadar je bila matematična struktura kompleksna, je preprost jezik postal ključen: učenci so dosegli znatno višje rezultate pri kompleksnih nalogah, napisanih v preprostem jeziku. Najnižja uspešnost je bila zaznana takrat, ko so bile visoke jezikovne in matematične zahteve. Pri učencih zaznana jezikovna kompleksnost je negativno korelirala z uspešnostjo, kar kaže, da lahko ocena jezikovne kompleksnosti pri učencih ovira reševanje nalog. Učenci četrtega razreda so dosegli boljše rezultate kot učenci tretjega razreda, kar odraža razvojni napredek na področju bralnega razumevanja in matematičnega razmišljanja. Izsledki poudarjajo pedagoški pomen usklajevanja besedilnih nalog z jezikovno pripravljenostjo učencev ter potrebo po izrecnem poučevanju akademskih jezikovnih struktur, ki podpirajo matematično razumevanje in reševanje nalog.
Prenosi
Literatura
Adu-Gyamfi, K., Bossé, M. J., & Faulconer, J. (2010). Assessing understanding through reading and writing in mathematics. International Journal For Mathematics Teaching And Learning, 11(5), 1–22.
Barbu, O. C. & Beal C. R. (2010). Effects of linguistic complexity and math difficulty. International Journal of Education, 11(2), 1–19.
Barwell, R. (2005). Ambiguity in the mathematics classroom. Language and Education, 19(2), 118–126.
Benjamin, A. (2013). Math in plain English. Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group.
Bergqvist, E., Theens, F., & Österholm, M. (2018). The role of linguistic features when reading and solving mathematics tasks in different languages. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 51, 41–55.
Caponera, E., Sestito, P., & Russo, P. M. (2016). The influence of reading literacy on mathematics and science achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 109(2), 197–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2014.936998
Chow, J. C., & Ekholm, E. (2019). Language domains differentially predict mathematics performance in young children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 46, 179–186.
Chow, J. C., Majeika, C. E., & Sheaffer, A. W. (2021). Language skills of children with and without mathematics difficulty. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 64(9), 3571–3577. https://doi.org/10.1044/2021_JSLHR-2000378
Cindrić, M., Mišurac, I., Dragičević, A., & Pastuović, B. (2025). Matematička mreža 4: Udžbenik matematike u četvrtom razredu osnovne škole [Mathematical network 4: A mathematics textbook for the fourth grade of primary school]. Školska knjiga.
Cooper, B., & Dunne, M. (1999). Assessing children’s mathematical knowledge: Social class, sex, and problem-solving. McGraw-Hill Education.
Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power and pedagogy. Multilingual Matters.
Ćužić, T. (2019). Hrvatski jezik u teoriji i primjeni [Croatian language in theory and practice]. Hrvatska sveučilišna naklada.
Daroczy, G., Wolska, M., Meurers, W. D., & Nuerk, H. C. (2015). Word problems: A review of linguistic and numerical factors contributing to their difficulty. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 348. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00348
Erath, K., Prediger, S., Quasthoff, U., & Heller, V. (2018). Discourse competence as important part of academic language proficiency in mathematics classrooms: The case of explaining to learn and learning to explain. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 99, 161–179.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Martin, J. R. (1993). Writing science: Literacy and discursive power. Falmer Press.
Haworth, C. M. A., Kovas, Y., Hrlaar, N., Hayiou-Thomas, M. E., Petrill, S. A., Dale, P. S., & Plomin, R. (2009). Generalist genes and learning disabilities: A multivariate genetic analysis of low performance in reading, mathematics, language and general cognitive ability in a sample of 8000 12-year old twins. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 50(10), 1318–1325. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7610.2009.02114.x
Hickendorff, M. (2013). The language factor in elementary mathematics assessments: Computational skills and applied problem solving in a multidimensional IRT framework. Applied Measurement in Education, 26(4), 253–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/08957347.2013.824451
Hickendorff, M. (2021). The demands of simple and complex arithmetic word problems on language and cognitive resources. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1–12.
Jaffe, E., & Bolger, P. (2023). Linguistic complexity in mathematical word problems: A multidimensional perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology, 115(4), 567–582.
Johnson, E., & Monroe, B. (2004). Simplified language as an accommodation on math tests. Assessment for effective intervention, 29(3), 35–45.
Jourdain, L., & Sharma, S. (2016). Language challenges in mathematics education: A literature review. Waikato Journal of Education, 2(2), 43–56.
Kurnik, Z. (2010). Posebne metode rješavanja matematičkih problema [Special methods for solving mathematical problems]. Element.
Kuzle, A. (2013). Promoting writing in mathematics: Prospective teachers’ experiences and perspectives on the process of writing when doing mathematics as problem solving. Centre for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 3(4), 41–59. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.222
Lakuš, M., & Erdeljac, V. (2012). Uspjeh u nastavnim predmetima hrvatskome jeziku i matematici kod učenika s disleksijom [Achievement in Croatian language and mathematics among students with dyslexia]. Govor, 29(2), 97–119.
Lenček, J., Jozipović, P., & Ivanko, M. (2025). Uloga matematičkog jezika u rješavanju zadataka učenika s diskalkulijom [The role of mathematical language in problem solving among students with dyscalculia]. Logopedija, 15(1), 21–44.
Leiss, D., Plath, J., & Schwippert, K. (2019). Language and mathematics-key factors influencing the comprehension process in reality-based tasks. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 21(2), 131–153.
Markovac, J. (2001). Metodika početne nastave matematike [Methodology of early mathematics instruction]. Školska knjiga.
Markovac, J. (2019a). Zbirka zadataka za treći razred osnovne škole [Workbook of mathematics problems for the third grade of primary school]. Alfa.
Markovac, J. (2019b). Zbirka zadataka za četvrti razred osnovne škole [Workbook of mathematics problems for the fourth grade of primary school]. Alfa.
Martiniello, M. (2009). Linguistic complexity, schematic representations, and differential item functioning for English language learners in math tests. Educational Assessment, 14(3–4), 160–179.
Masriyah, Kohar, A. W., Rahaju, E. B., Fardah, D. K., & Hanifah, U. (2024). Assessing student teachers’ ability in posing mathematical reasoning problems. Centre for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 14(2), 9–37. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.1368
Moschkovich, J. (2013). Language and mathematics education: Multiple perspectives and directions for research. Information Age Publishing.
Nagy, W., & Townsend, D. (2012). Academic language: What it is and why it matters. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(1), 92–106.
Núñez, R., Edwards, L., & Matos, J. F. (2020). Mathematical cognition and language: Polysemy, metaphor, and meaning. Journal of Mathematical Behaviour, 59, 44–56.
Österholm, M. (2006). Characterizing reading comprehension of mathematical texts. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 63(3), 325–346.
Österholm, M., & Bergqvist, E. (2013). What is so special about mathematical texts? Analyses of common claims in research literature and of properties of textbooks. ZDM – The International Journal on Mathematics Education, 45(5), 751–763.
Ovčar, S. (1987). Tekstualni zadatci u početnoj nastavi matematike [Word problems in early mathematics education]. Istraživanja odgoja i obrazovanja, 7, 23–39.
Polya, G. (2003). Matematičko otkriće [Mathematical discovery]. HMD.
Posokhova, I. (2001). Matematika bez suza [Mathematics without tears]. Ostvarenje.
Prediger, S., Erath, K., & Moser Opitz, E. (2019). The language dimension of mathematical difficulties. In A. Fritz, V. Haase, & P. Räsänen (Eds.), International handbook of math learning difficulties: From the laboratory to the classroom (pp. 437–455). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-97148-3
Ruijia, Z., Talib, O., Burhanuddin, N. A. N. binti, & Wenling, L. (2022). The effect of math self-concept and self-efficacy on the math achievement of sixth-grade primary school students: The mediating role of math anxiety. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 11(3), 767–778.
Sanz, M. T., López-Iñesta, L., Garcia-Costa, D., & Grimaldo, F. (2020). Measuring arithmetic word problem complexity through reading comprehension and learning analytics. Mathematics, 8(9), Article 1556. https://doi.org/10.3390/math8091556
Schleppegrell, M. J. (2007). The linguistic challenges of mathematics teaching and learning: A research review. Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 23(2), 139–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/10573560601158461
Shorrocks-Taylor, D., & Hargreaves, M. (1999). Making it clear: A review of language issues in testing with special reference to the National Curriculum mathematics tests at key stage 2. Educational Research, 41(2), 123–136.
Sidenvall, J., Lithner, J., & Jäder, J. (2015). Students’ reasoning in mathematics textbook tasksolving. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 46(4), 533–552.
Strohmaier, A. R., Lehner, M. C., Beitlich, J. T., & Reiss, K. M. (2019). Eye movements during mathematical word problem solving: Global measures and individual differences. Journal für Mathematik Didaktik, 40(2), 255–287.
Sun, L. (2024). How to teach vocabulary: Based on effect of semantic transparency upon English vocabulary acquisition. Frontiers in Science and Engineering, 5(2), 51–58.
Verschaffel, L., Greer, B., & De Corte, E. (2002). Everyday knowledge and mathematical modeling of school word problems. In K. Gravemeijer, R. Lehrer, B. Van Oers, & L. Verschaffel (Eds.), Symbolizing, modeling and tool use in mathematics education (pp. 257–276). Springer Netherlands.
Vilenius-Tuohima, A., Aunola, K., & Nurmi, J.-E. (2008). The association between mathematical word problems and reading comprehension. An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 28(4), 409–426.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language (A. Kozulin, Trans.). MIT Press. (Original work published 1934)
Wijaya, A., van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M., & Doorman, M. (2015). Opportunity-to-learn context-based tasks provided by mathematics textbooks. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 89(1), 41–65.
Živković, M., Pellizzoni, S., Doz, E., Cuder, A., Mammarella, I., & Passolunghi, M. C. (2023). Math self-efficacy or anxiety? The role of emotional and motivational contribution in math performance. Social Psychology of Education, 26, 579–601.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitted article, which will be published online in the Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal (for short: CEPS Journal) by University of Ljubljana Press (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education, Kardeljeva ploščad 16, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). The Author’s/Authors’ name(s) will be evident in the article in the journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in the hands of the publisher.
- The Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit themselves to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
