Razvoj učitelja raziskovalca? Pojasnitev razumevanj in pristopov v začetnem izobraževanju učiteljev na Kosovu

  • Fjolla Kaçaniku Faculty of Education, University of Prishtina, Kosovo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.865
Ključne besede: programske vrednote in cilji, začetno izobraževanje učiteljev, študent pedagoških smeri, praksa izobraževalca prihodnjih učiteljev, razvoj učitelja raziskovalca

Povzetek

Učitelj raziskovalec je prevladujoč koncept v dobi postprofesionalizma izobraževanja učiteljev. Razvoj učiteljev raziskovalcev je obravnavan skupaj z reformiranjem programov začetnega izobraževanja učiteljev v smeri oprtosti na raziskovanju. Trenutno ni soglasja glede razumevanja in metodologije razvoja učiteljev raziskovalcev. Namen te raziskave je preučiti razumevanja in pristope študentov pedagoških smeri ter izobraževalcev prihodnjih učiteljev glede razvoja učiteljev raziskovalcev med začetnim izobraževanjem učiteljev na Kosovu skladno z gibanjem po izobraževanju učiteljev, ki temelji na raziskavah. Raziskava sledi kvalitativnemu raziskovalnemu načrtu. Podatki so bili zbrani prek odprtih vprašalnikov (n = 270 študentov pedagoških smeri), intervjujev (n = 15 izobraževalcev prihodnjih učiteljev) in pregledov programov (n = 5) dveh kosovskih institucij začetnega izobraževanja učiteljev. Uporabljajoč kategorije raziskovalnega predmetnika Healeyja in Jenkinsa kot vodilni okvir, je raziskava odkrila štiri skupke nasprotujočih si razumevanj in pristopov, povezanih s prakso izobraževalcev prihodnjih učiteljev ter programskimi vrednotami in cilji, kar lomi kontekst razvoja učitelja raziskovalca na Kosovu. Da bi dosegli soglasje glede razvoja učitelja raziskovalca, so potrebna usklajena prizadevanja, ki bi v širšem okviru naslovila trenutno izolirana in različna razumevanja ter prakse začetnega izobraževanja učiteljev.

Prenosi

Podatki o prenosih še niso na voljo.

Literatura

Afdal, H. W., & Spernes, K. (2018). Designing and redesigning research-based teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 74, 215–228. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0742051X17314476?via%3Dihub

Alvunger, D., & Wahlström, N. (2017). Research-based teacher education? Exploring the meaning potentials of Swedish teacher education. Teachers and Teaching, 24(4), 332–349.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.

Buchberger, F., Campos, B. P., Kallos, D., & Stephenson, J. (2000). Green paper on teacher education in Europe: high quality teacher education for high quality education and training. Thematic Network on Teacher Education in Europe. Umea University.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. SAGE Publications.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2016). Research on teaching and teacher education and its influences on policy and practice. Educational Researcher, 45(2), 83–91.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2017). Teacher education around the world: What can we learn from international practice? European Journal of Teacher Education, 40(3), 291–309.

Darling-Hammond, L., & Bransford, J. (2005). Preparing teachers for a changing world: What teachers should learn and be able to do. Jossey-Bass.

Griffiths, R. (2004). Knowledge production and the research-teaching nexus: The case of the built environment disciplines. Studies in Higher Education, 29(6), 709–726.

Hargreaves, A. (2003). Teaching in the knowledge society. Education in the age of insecurity. Open University Press.

Healey, M. (2005). Linking research and teaching exploring disciplinary spaces and the role of inquiry-based learning. In R. Barnett (Ed.), Reshaping the university: New relationships between research, scholarship and teaching (pp. 67–78). Open University Press/McGraw-Hill Education.

Healey, M., & Jenkins, A. (2009). Developing undergraduate research and inquiry. Higher Education Academy.

Jyrhämä, R., Kynaslahti, H., Krokfors, L., Byman, R., Maaranen, K., Toom, A., & Kansanen, P. (2008). The appreciation and realization of research-based teacher education: Finnish students’ experiences of teacher education. European Journal of Teacher Education, 31(1), 1–16.

Kaçaniku, F. (2017). The impact of the Bologna Process in Kosovo: Prospects and challenges. Journal of the European Higher Education Area, 8(4), 57–76.

Kaçaniku, F. (2020). Towards quality assurance and enhancement: The influence of the Bologna Process in Kosovo’s higher education. Quality in Higher Education, 26(1), 32–47.

Kaçaniku, F., Gjelaj, M., & Saqipi, B. (2019). Context guided instruction to develop reflection competence of education professionals. Review of Education, Pedagogy, and Cultural Studies, 41(1), 48–67.

Krokfors, L., Kynäslahti, H., Stenberg, K., Toom, A., Maaranen, K., Jyrhämä, R., Byman, R., & Kansanen, P. (2011). Investigating Finnish teacher educators’ views on research based teacher education. Teaching Education, 22(1), 1–13.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage.

Munthe, E., & Rogne, M. (2015). Research based teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 46, 17–24. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0742051X14001322

Niemi, H. (2008). Advancing research into and during teacher education. In B. Hudson & P. Zgaga (Eds.), Teacher education policy in Europe: A voice of higher education institutions (pp. 183–208). University of Umeå.

Niemi, H., & Nevgi, A. (2014). Research studies and active learning promoting professional competences in Finnish teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 43, 131–142. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0742051X14000821

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2017). Thematic analysis: Striving to meet the trustworthiness criteria. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 16, 1–13. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/1609406917733847

Puustinen, M., Säntti, J., Koski, A., & Tammi, T. (2018). Teaching: A practical or research-based profession? Teacher candidates’ approaches to research-based teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 74, 170–179. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0742051X17310661?via%3Dihub

Saqipi, B. (2019). Teacher education policy discourse in the midst of system reorganisation and policy transfer: Lessons for small and developing countries. International Journal of Management in Education, 13(1), 28–39.

Saqipi, B. (2020). Using activity systems theory to understand change process in developing teacher as researcher at master level studies. International Journal of Learning and Change, 12(1), 1–14.

Saqipi, B., & Vogrinc, J. (2016). Developing research competence at pre-service teacher education. Didactica Slovenica, 31(2), 101–117.

Stenhouse, L. (1981). What counts as research? British Journal of Educational Studies, 29(2), 103–114.

Toom, A., Kynäslahti, H., Krokfors, L., Jyrhämä, R., Byman, R., Stenberg, K., Maaranen, K., Kansanen, P. (2010). Experiences of a research-based approach to teacher education: Suggestions for future policies. European Journal of Education, 45(2), 331–344.

Objavljeno
2020-09-29
Kako citirati
Kaçaniku, F. (2020). Razvoj učitelja raziskovalca? Pojasnitev razumevanj in pristopov v začetnem izobraževanju učiteljev na Kosovu. Revija Centra Za študij Edukacijskih Strategij , 10(3), 53–76. https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.865
Številka
Letn. 10 Št. 3 (2020): The Development of Teacher Research as a Form of Developing Teacher Pedagogical Practice
Rubrike
FOCUS

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitted article, which will be published online in the Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal (for short: CEPS Journal) by University of Ljubljana Press (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education, Kardeljeva ploščad 16, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). The Author’s/Authors’ name(s) will be evident in the article in the journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in the hands of the publisher.
  2. The Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit themselves to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
  3. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  4. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
  5. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.