Izkušnje slovenskih učiteljev in učencev 4. in 5. razreda osnovne šole s poukom na prostem pri predmetu naravoslovje in tehnika
Povzetek
Ta prispevek predstavlja izsledke raziskave o pouku na prostem pri predmetu naravoslovje in tehnika v 4. in 5. razredu osnovne šole v okolici šole. Preučuje razlike med učitelji ter med učitelji in učenci pa tudi ideje in omejitve pouka na prostem. V raziskavo je bilo vključenih 70 učiteljev 4. in 5. razreda ter 154 učencev 4. razreda in 151 učencev 5. razreda osnovne šole. Podatki so bili pridobljeni z dvema vprašalnikoma: e-vprašalnikom za učitelje in z vprašalnikom tipa papir – svinčnik za učence. Učitelji navajajo, da 13 odstotkov časa pri predmetu naravoslovje in tehnika predstavlja pouk na prostem. Statistično pomembne razlike so bile ugotovljene med učitelji z različno količino izkušenj s poučevanjem, medtem ko se razlike v količini pouka na prostem niso odrazile med učitelji glede na stratum šole in učitelji, ki so imeli kot učenci zgodnje izkušnje s poukom na prostem v bližini šole, v primerjavi z učitelji, ki niso imeli takšnih izkušenj. Učitelji so imeli več specifičnih in splošnih idej za dejavnosti na prostem za tematske sklope iz učnega načrta za predmet naravoslovje in tehnika in so poročali o podobnih težavah pri načrtovanju pouka na prostem, kot so zaznane v tujih virih. Rezultati raziskave kažejo, da učitelji pogosteje poročajo o uporabi pouka na prostem v bližini šole, kot so ga učenci zaznavajo. Učenci so poročali, da se takšne dejavnosti običajno odvijajo približno dvakrat letno, večinoma na igriščih, travnikih in v gozdovih. Rezultati omogočajo vpogled v stanje pouka na prostem pri predmetu naravoslovje in tehnika ter posredno ponujajo priložnosti za razmislek in ukrepanje glede pouka na prostem z različnih vidikov.
Prenosi
Literatura
Bank, J., & Greve, J. (2013). Children’s health-related life-styles: How parental child care affects them. University Press of Southern Denmark.
Barker, S., Slingsby, D. R., & Tilling, S. (2002). Teaching biology outside the classroom: Is it heading for extinction? A report on outdoor biology teaching in the 14–19 curriculum. Field Studies Council.
Beames, S., Higgins, P., & Nicol, R. (2012). Learning outside the classroom: Theory and guidelines for practice. Routledge.
Blatt, E., & Patrick, P. (2014). An exploration of pre-service teachers’ experiences in outdoor ‘places’ and intentions for teaching in the outdoors. International Journal of Science Education, 36(13), 2243–2264.
Bocks, S. (2018). 31 Days of Outdoor STEM activities for kids. https://littlebinsforlittlehands.com/outdoor-stem-activities-science-kids/
Ceciliani, A., & Bortolotti, A. (2013). Outdoor motor play: Analysis, speculations, research paths. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 3(3), 65–86.
Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
DfES [Department for Education and Skills]. (2006). Learning outside the classroom: Manifesto.
https://www.lotc.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/G1.-LOtC-Manifesto.pdf
Dnevi dejavnosti. (1998). Days of activities. https://www.gov.si/assets/ministrstva/MIZS/Dokumenti/Osnovna-sola/Ucni-nacrti/Drugi-konceptualni-dokumenti/Dnevi_dejavnosti.pdf
Education.com. (2012). Nature activities & nature experiments. https://www.education.com/activity/nature-activities/
English Outdoor Council. (n. d.). High Quality Outdoor Education. https://www.englishoutdoorcouncil.org/HQOE.pdf
Fiskum, T. A., & Jacobsen, K. (2012). Individual differences and possible effects from outdoor education: Long time and short time benefits. World Journal of Education, 2(4), 20–23.
Gilbertson, K., Bates, T., McLaughlin, T., & Ewert, A. (2006). Outdoor education: Methods and strategies. Human kinetics.
Gill, T. (2014). The benefits of children’s engagement with nature: A systematic literature review. Children, Youth and Environments, 24(2), 10–34.
Ginnis, P. (2002). The teacher’s toolkit: Raise classroom achievement with strategies for every learner. Crown House Publishing.
Gros, J., MarinÄiÄ, M., Komljanc, N., Brcar, P., Rusjan, N., Rudman, I., & Ajtnik, M. (2001). Å ola v naravi za devetletno osnovno Å¡olo. Koncept [The Concept of Outdoor School]. https://www.gov.si/assets/ministrstva/MIZS/Dokumenti/Osnovna-sola/Ucni-nacrti/Drugi-konceptualni-dokumenti/Sola_v_naravi.pdf
Hamid, K. (2018). Fun outdoor science lesson ideas for KS1. https://www.pentagonplay.co.uk/news-and-info/outdoor-science-lessons
Harlen, W., & Holroyd, C. (1997). Primary teachers’ understanding of concepts of science: Impact on confidence and teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 19(1), 93–105.
Hawley, T., & Gunner, M. (2000). Starting smart: How early experiences affect brain development. Ounce of Prevention Fund.
Jeronen, E., & Jeronen, J. (2012). Outdoor education in Finland. Current topic. Socioekonomické a humanitnì studie. Studies of Socio-Economic and Humanities, 2(2), 152–160.
JuriÅ¡eviÄ, M., Devetak, I., RazdevÅ¡ek PuÄko, C., & Glažar, S. A. (2008). Intrinsic motivation of preâ€service primary school teachers for learning chemistry in relation to their academic achievement. International Journal of Science Education, 30(2), 285–285.
Kinnunen, P., Lampiselkä, J., Meisalo., V., & Malmi, L. (2016). Research on teaching and learning in physics and chemistry in NorDiNa papers. Nordina: Nordic studies in science education, 12(1), 3–20.
Klofutar, Š., Jerman, J., & Torkar, G. (2020). Direct versus vicarious experiences for developing children’s skills of observation in early science education. International Journal of Early Years Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669760.2020.1814214
Kolar, M., Krnel, D., & Velkavrh, A. (2011). Spoznavanje okolja. UÄni naÄrt [Environmental studies. National curriculum]. Ministrstvo RS za Å¡olstvo in Å¡port, Zavod RS za Å¡olstvo.
Laganis, J., Prosen, K., & Torkar, G. (2017). Classroom versus outdoor biology education using a woody species identification digital dichotomous key. Natural Sciences Education, 46(1), 1–9.
Lelliott, A., & Rollnick, M. (2010). Big ideas: A review of astronomy education research 1974–2008. International Journal of Science Education, 32(13), 1771–1799.
MacQuarrie, S. (2016). Everyday teaching and outdoor learning: Developing an integrated approach to support school-based provision. Education 3-13, 46(3), 345–361.
Malone, K. (2008). Every experience matters: An evidence based research report on the role of learning outside the classroom for children’s whole development from birth to eighteen years. Farming & Countryside Education.
MIZÅ [Ministry of Education, Science and Sport]. (2018). Education system in Slovenia. http://www.mizs.gov.si/en/areas_of_work/directorate_of_higher_education/enic_naric_centre/education_system_in_slovenia/
Mygind, E. (2009). A comparison of children’s’ statements about social relations and teaching in the classroom and in the outdoor environment. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 9(2), 151–169.
National Curriculum in England. (2013). GOV.UK. Science programmes of study.
Nicol, R., Higgins, P., Ross, H., & Mannion, G. (2007). Outdoor education in Scotland: A summary of recent research. Scottish Natural Heritage.
Outdoor Classroom Day. (2020). Lessons ideas. https://outdoorclassroomday.com/resources/lesson-ideas/
Pallant, J. (2011). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using SPSS, 4th Edition. Allen & Unwin.
Pavlin, J., & ÄŒepiÄ, M. (2015). The education of pre-service primary school teachers for teaching the physics part of science in Slovenia. In F. Claudio & M. Sperandeo-Mineo (Eds.), Teaching/learning physics: Integrating research into practice. GIREP - MPTL 2014 International Conference (pp. 137–144). http://www1.unipa.it/girep2014/proceedings/Chapter%202.pdf
Peacock, A., & Pratt, N. (2009). How young people respond to learning spaces outside school: A sociocultural perspective. Learning Environments Research, 14(1), 11–24.
PeÄar, M., AnÄ‘ić, D., Hergan, I., Skribe Dimec, D., & Pavlin, J. (2020). How to encourage children’s connectedness to nature by outdoor learning of children in Croatian and Slovenian schools? In L. Gómez Chova, A. López MartÃnez, & I. Candel Torres (Eds.), EDULEARN20 (pp. 714–723). https://iated.org/edulearn/publications
PotoÄnik, R., & Devetak, I. (2018). The differences between pre-service chemistry, fine art, and primary education teachers regarding interest and knowledge about fine art materials. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 8(4), 109–130.
Rickinson, M., Dillon, J., Teamey, K., Morris, M., Young Choi, M., Sanders, D. et al. (2004). A review of research on outdoor learning. Field Studies Council.
Ross, H., Nicol, R., & Higgins, P. (2007). Outdoor study of nature: Teachers’ motivations and contexts. Scottish Educational Review, 39(2), 160–172.
Shume, T. J., & Blatt, E. (2019). A sociocultural investigation of pre-service teachers’ outdoor experiences and perceived obstacles to outdoor learning. Environmental Education Research, 25(9), 1–21.
Sjöblom, P., & Svens, M. (2019). Learning in the Finnish outdoor classroom: Students’ views. Journal of Adventure Education and Outdoor Learning, 19(4) 301–314.
Skribe Dimec, D. (2019). Outdoor education in the Slovenian school system supports cultural and environmental education. In Zandvliet, D. B. (Ed.). Culture and environment: Weaving new connections (pp. 209–229). Brill Sense.
Skribe Dimec, D., & Kokalj, I. (2018). The development and role of outdoor education and CŠOD in the Slovenian school system. In P. Becker, B. Humberstone, C. Loynes, & J. Schirp (Eds.), The changing world of outdoor learning in Europe (1st ed; pp. 207–220). Routledge, Routledge research in education.
Susman, K., & Pavlin, J. (2020). Improvements in teachers’ knowledge and understanding of basic astronomy concepts through didactic games. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 19(6), 1020–1033.
Å ebjaniÄ, E., & Skribe Dimec, D. (2019). Primeri dobre prakse pouka na prostem v Sloveniji in tujini [Examples of good practice of outdoor education in Slovenia and abroad]. Sodobna pedagogika, 70(2), 70–85.
Å temberger, V. (2012). Å olsko okolje kot uÄno okolje ali pouk zunaj [The school environment as a learning environment or outdoor lesson]. Razredni pouk, 14(1/2), 84−90.
Taštanoska, T. (2017). The education system in the Republic of Slovenia 2016. The Ministry of Education, Science and Sport.https://eng.cmepius.si/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/The-Education-System-in-the-Republic-of-Slovenia-2016-17.pdf
Teach Junkie. (2017). 19 Fun ideas & resources for force and motion. http://www.teachjunkie.com/sciences/19-fun-ideas-resources-force-and-motion/
TomažiÄ, I., & Vidic, T. (2013). Z igro v Äarobni svet narave. PriroÄnik za naravoslovje v prvem triletju [To the magical world of nature through play. Handbook for science in the first triad]. Mladinska knjiga.
Torkar, G. (2013). Live what you teach & teach what you live: Student views on the acceptability of teachers’ value-related statements about sustainability and climate change. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 3(1), 45–58.
Torkar, G., Debevec, V., Johnson, B., & Manoli, C. (2020). Assessing children’s environmental worldviews and concerns. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal. https://www.cepsj.si/index.php/cepsj/article/view/793/401, https://doi.org/10.26529/cepsj.793
Tovey, H. (2008). Playing outdoors. Spaces and places, risk and challenge. Open University Press.
Tuuling, L., Õun, T., & Ugaste, A. (2018). Teachers’ opinions on utilising outdoor learning in the preschools of Estonia. Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning, 19(4), 358–370.
Vidmar, E. (2016). Vpliv izkuÅ¡enj uÄiteljev razrednega pouka na njihovo mnenje o vkljuÄevanju Å¡olskega vrta v pouk [The influence of in-service primary school teachers’ experiences on their opinion on the integration of the school garden into lessons] (Master’s thesis). PedagoÅ¡ka fakulteta.
Vodopivec, I., Papotnik, A., GostinÄar BlagotinÅ¡ek, A., Skribe Dimec, D., & Balon, A. (2011). Naravoslovje in tehnika. UÄni naÄrt [Science and technology. National curriculum]. Ministrstvo RS za Å¡olstvo in Å¡port, Zavod RS za Å¡olstvo.
Vogrinc, J. (2008). Kvalitativno raziskovanje na pedagoÅ¡kem podroÄju [Qualitative research in the field of education]. PedagoÅ¡ka fakulteta.
Waite S. (Ed.). (2011). Children learning outside the classroom: From birth to eleven. Sage.
Waite, S. (2010). Losing our way? The downward path for outdoor learning for children aged 2-11 years. Journal of Adventure Education & Outdoor Learning, 10(2), 111–126.
Walan, S., & Chang Rundgren, S-N. (2014). Investigating preschool and primary school teachers’ self-efficacy and needs in teaching science: A pilot study. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 4(1), 51–67.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitted article, which will be published online in the Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal (for short: CEPS Journal) by University of Ljubljana Press (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education, Kardeljeva ploščad 16, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). The Author’s/Authors’ name(s) will be evident in the article in the journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in the hands of the publisher.
- The Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit themselves to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
