Konsekvencialistični razlogi za nekatere reforme izobraževanja
Povzetek
Razlogi za reforme izobraževanja kot posebne oblike družbenih reform so konsekvencialistični ali nekonsekvencialistični. Razlogi za reformo izobraževanja, ki so na kratko obravnavani v tem prispevku z vidika filozofije vzgoje, so predvsem konsekvencialistični. To so razlogi za tiste predlagane reforme izobraževanja v državah EU, katerih strateški cilj je enačen s krepitvijo dveh vrednot: ustvarjalnosti in inovativnosti. Pri tem se predpostavlja, da bodo imele te reforme izobraževanja dobre učinke, ne pa to, da so že same po sebi nekaj dobrega. Čeprav se mogoče zdi, da imata ustvarjalnost in inovativnost intrinzično vrednost, pa se v teh reformah izobraževanja obravnavata predvsem kot instrumentalni vrednoti. Zdi se, da uvedbe takšnih reform izobraževanja ni mogoče razumeti kot posledice odločitve, ki temelji na vzročni razlagi, ampak prej kot odločitev, ki temelji na posebni teleološki razlagi, ki ima logično formo »praktičnega silogizma«. V tem primeru je neko dejanje pojasnjeno z vidika ciljev in namenov akterja; kaže, da je akter storil to, kar je storil, zato ker je poskušal doseči določen cilj in je verjel, da so določena sredstva nujna ali zadostna za dosego tega cilja.
Prenosi
Literatura
Anscombe, G. E. M. (1963). Intention. Basil Blackwell.
Anscombe, G. E. M. (1989). Von Wright on practical inference. In P. A. Schlipp & L. E. Hahn (Eds.), The philosophy of Georg Henrik von Wright. La Salle.
Beardsley, M. C. (1965). Intrinsic value. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 26(1), 1–17.
Brown, W. (2015). Undoing the demos: Neoliberalism’s stealth revolution. Zone Books.
Cachia, R., Ferrari, A., Ala-Mutka, K., & Punie, Y. (2010). Creative learning and innovative teaching: Final report on the study on creativity and innovation in education in the EU member states. Publications Office of the European Union.
Conference Theme. (2013). Creativity and innovation in educational research. ECER.
Council of Europe. (2009). Council conclusions on a strategic framework for European cooperation in education and training (Education and training 2020). Official Journal C 119, 28. 05. 2009.
Elster, J. (1987). Comment on van der Veen and Van Parijs. Theory and Society, 15(5), 709–721.
EUR LEX. (2006). EUR-Lex-52006DC0033 (Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions – Implementing the Community Lisbon Programme: Fostering entrepreneurial mindsets through education and learning /* COM/2006/0033 final */).
EUR LEX. (2008). EUR-Lex-l29020 (Decision No 1350/2008/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 concerning the European Year of Creativity and Innovation (2009)).
Ferry, L. (2014). L’innovation destructrice [Destructive innovation]. Plon.
Frankena, W. K. (1973). Ethics. Prentice-Hall.
Garrouste, C. (2010). 100 years of educational reforms in Europe: A contextual database. Publications Office of the European Union.
Godin, B. (2008). Innovation: The history of a category, project on the intellectual history of innovation working paper No. 1. www.csiic.ca
Jolly, A. (Ed.) (2003). Innovation: Harnessing creativity for business growth. Kogan Page.
Kant, I. (2004). The moral law (Groundwork of the metaphysic of morals). Routledge.
Laval, C. (2018). Foucault, Bourdieu et la question néolibérale [Foucault, Bourdieu and the neoliberal question]. La découverte.
Levin, B. (1998). An epidemic of education policy: (What) can we learn from each other? Comparative Education, 34(2), 131–141.
MacIntyre, A. (1964). Against utilitarianism. In T. H. B. Hollins (Ed.), Aims in Education. The Philosophical Approach. Manchester University Press.
Manifesto for creativity and innovation in Europe. (2009). European Commission - IP/09/1702 12/11/2009. P. 1.
Moore, G. E. (1912). Ethics. Williams and Norgate.
Ross, D. (2002). The right and the good. Clarendon Press.
Schumpeter, J. A. (1942/1962). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. Harper.
Tatarkiewicz, W. (1980). A history of six ideas: An essay in aesthetics. Nijhoff.
Von Wright, G. H. (1971). Explanation and understanding. Cornell University Press.
White, J. (1982). The aims of education restated. Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Zimmerman, M. J. (2010). Intrinsic vs. extrinsic value. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopaedia of philosophy (Winter ed). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2010/entries/value-intrinsic-extrinsic/
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitted article, which will be published online in the Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal (for short: CEPS Journal) by University of Ljubljana Press (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education, Kardeljeva ploščad 16, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). The Author’s/Authors’ name(s) will be evident in the article in the journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in the hands of the publisher.
- The Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit themselves to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
