Šolske reforme za pravičnost in kakovost: analiza z gledišča izobraževalnega ekosistema s sklicevanjem na finske izobraževalne preobrazbe
Povzetek
Članek se začne z resnim vprašanjem, zakaj šolske reforme ne vodijo k boljšemu znanju. Čeprav se je dostop do izobrazbe znatno povečal, je kakovost izobraževanja ponekod zelo nizka. Resničnost je takšna, da bo do leta 2030 800 milijonov mladih, ki ne bodo opremljeni s temeljnimi veščinami branja in matematike. Odgovore smo iskali v zasnovi izobraževalnega ekosistema in tem, kako naj bi bili različni podsistemi (kot so na primer: kurikularni sistem, evalvacijski sistemi, politika izobraževanja učiteljev in trg dela) medsebojno povezani, sistematične spremembe pa podprte s pomočjo vseh teh podsistemov. Osnovni pogoji uspešnega delovanja so sodelovanje različnih udeležencev in interesentov, da se znotraj podsistemov in med podsistemi izoblikuje aktivno vzajemno delovanje, ki bi podprlo pravičnost in kakovost v izobraževanju. Šolske reforme so zapleteni procesi, ki zahtevajo raznolikost partnerjev in upravljanje, pri čemer je prisotno zaupanje. Članek prav tako ponudi bežen opis primera, kako so bile izvedene šolske reforme skladno s konceptom ekosistema v finskih kontekstih. Na koncu članek povzema ideje o tem, kako bi izobraževalni ekosistemi lahko pomagali pri premagovanju svetovnih učnih kriz.
Prenosi
Literatura
Collaboration as a strategy for promoting equity in education: Possibilities and barriers. Journal of Professional Capital and Community, 1(2), 159–172. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPCC-12-2015-0013
Antinluoma, M., Ilomäki, L., Lahti-Nuuttila, P., & Toom, A. (2018). Schools as professional learning communities. Journal of Education and Learning, 7(5), 76–91. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v7n5p76
Biesta, G. J. J. (2007). Why ‘what works’ won’t work: Evidence-based practice and the democratic deficit in educational research. Educational Theory, 57(1), 1–22.
Burns, T., Köster, F., & Fuster, M. (2016). Education governance in action: Lessons from case studies. OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264262829-en
Cerna, L. (2014). Trust: What it is and why it matters for governance and education. OECD Education Working Papers, No. 108. OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/5jxswcg0t6wl-enOECD
Dowd, M. (2019). Ecosystem: Definition, types, structure & examples. Sciencing. https://sciencing.com/ecosystem-definition-types-structure-examples-13719218.html
European Commission. (2017). School development and excellent teaching for a great start in life. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/aa9ffc00-4524-11e7-aea8-01aa75ed71a1
Field, S., Kuczera, M., & Pont, B. (2007). No more failures. Ten steps to equity in education. OECD. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264032606-en
FNAE (Finnish National Agency of Education). (2018). Finnish education in a nutshell.
https://www.oph.fi/sites/default/files/documents/finnish_education_in_a_nutshell.pdf
FINEEC (The Finnish Education Evaluation Centre). (2020). FINEEC. https://karvi.fi/en/fineec/
Garira, E. (2020). A proposed unified conceptual framework for quality of education in schools. SAGE Open, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019899445
Gorard, S., & Smith, E. (2004). An international comparison of equity in education systems. Comparative Education, 40(1), 15–28.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0305006042000184863
Habermas, J. (1987). The theory of communicative action, volume 2 - Lifeworld and system: A critique of functionalist reason. Beacon Press.
Harford, J., & O’Doherty, T. (2016), The discourse of partnership and the reality of reform: Interrogating the recent reform agenda at initial teacher education and induction levels in Ireland. Center for Educational Policy Studies, 6(3), 37–58.
Hargreaves, A., Lieberman, A., Fullan, M., & Hopkins, D. (Eds.). (2009). Second international handbook of educational change. Springer.
Hudson, B. (2017). (Ed.). Overcoming fragmentation in teacher education policy and practice. Cambridge University Press.
Jakku-Sihvonen, R., & Niemi, H. (2006). The Bologna process and its implementation in teacher education. In R. Jakku-Sihvonen & H. Niemi (Eds.), Research-based teacher education in Finland. Reflections by Finnish teacher educators (pp. 17–30). Finnish Educational Research Association.
Kahn, L. H., Monath, T. P., Bokma, B. H., GIbbd, E. P., & Aguirre, A. A. (2012). One health, one medicine. In A. A. Aguirre, R. S. Ostfeld, & P. Daszak (Eds.), New directions in conservation medicine: Applied cases of ecological health (pp. 33–44). Oxford University Press.
Kumpulainen, K., & Lankinen. T. (2016). Striving for educational equity and excellence: Evaluation and assessment in Finnish basic education. In H. Niemi, A. Toom, & A. Kallioniemi (Eds.), Miracle of education: The principles and practices of teaching and learning in Finnish schools (2nd ed., pp. 71–82). Sense Publishers.
Kyriakides, L., Creemers, B. P. M., & Charalambous, E. (2019). Searching for differential teacher and school effectiveness in terms of student socioeconomic status and gender: Implications for promoting equity. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 30(3), 286–308.
Laukkanen, R. (2007). Finnish strategy for high-level education for all. In N. C. Sognel & P. Jaccard (Eds.), Governance and performance of education systems. Springer.
Lee, W. O., & Manzon, M. (2014). The issue of equity and quality of education in Hong Kong. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher Asia, 23, 823–833. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40299-014-0214-1
Lefty, L., & J. Fraser. J. (Eds.), (2020). Teaching the world’s teachers (pp. 153–178). Johns Hopkins University Press.
LeTendre. G. K. (2018). Teaching in the USA: Decentralisation, inequality, and professional autonomy. In H. Niemi, A. Toom, A. Kallioniemi, & J. Lavonen (Eds.), The teacher’s role in the changing globalising world: Resources and challenges related to the professional work of teaching practices (pp. 91–108). Brill | Sense. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004372573_009
Low, E.-L. (2018). The changing roles of teachers and teacher learning in the twenty-first century: The Singapore story. In H. Niemi, A. Toom, A. Kallioniemi, & J. Lavonen (Eds.), The teacher’s role in the changing globalising world: Resources and challenges related to the professional work of teaching practices (pp. 125–140). Brill | Sense. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004372573_009
Mars, M., Bronstein, J., & Lusch, R. (2012). The value of a metaphor: Organisations and ecosystems. Organizational Dynamics, 41(4), 271–280.
Mason, M. (2016), Complexity theory and systemic change in education governance. In Burns, T. and F. Köster (Eds.), Governing education in a complex world, (pp. 41–54). OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264255364-4-en
Matsushita, R. (2017). The paradox of evidence-based education: From the decline of education to abandonment of the theories of education (trans. N. Murray). Educational Studies in Japan: International Yearbook, 11, 101–119
Moore, J. F. (2006). Business ecosystems and the view from the firm. The Antitrust Bulletin, 51(1), 31–75.
Niemi, H. (2016). Building partnerships in an educational ecosystem: Editorial. Center of Educational Policy Studies Journal, 6(3), 5–15.
http://hdl.handle.net/10138/167262
Niemi, H. (2021a). Equity and quality as aims of education: Teachers’ role in educational ecosystems. In E. Kuusisto, M. Ubani, P. Nokelainen & A. Toom (Eds.), Good teachers for tomorrow’s schools: Purpose, values, and talents in education (pp. 19–36). Brill.
https://brill.com/view/title/60323
Niemi, H. (2021b). Teacher education in at the crossroads–Educational ecosystems for equity and quality of learning. In Envisioning the teaching and learning of teachers for excellence and equity in education, (pp. 5–23). Springer.
Niemi, H., & Lavonen, J. (2020). Teacher education in Finland: Persistent efforts for high-quality teachers. In L. Lefty, & J. Fraser (Eds.), Teaching the world’s teachers (pp. 153–178). Johns Hopkins University Press.
Niemi, H., Kallioniemi, A., &. Toom, A. (2016). Epilogue: How to be prepared to face the future. In H. Niemi, A. Kallioniemi, &. A. Toom (Eds.), The miracle of education: The principles and practices of teaching and learning in Finnish schools (2nd revised ed., pp. 277–283. Sense Publishers.
Niemi, H., Lavonen, J., Kallioniemi, A., & Toom, A. (2018). The role of teachers in the Finnish educational system. In H. Niemi, A. Toom, A. Kallioniemi, & J. Lavonen (Eds.), The teacher’s role in the changing globalizing world (pp. 47–61). Brill | Sense. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004372573_004
Niemi, H., Multisilta, J., Lipponen, L., & Vivitsou, V. (Eds.) (2014). Finnish innovations and technologies in schools. Towards new ecosystems of learning. Sense Publishers
OECD. (2012). Equity and quality in education: Supporting disadvantaged students and schools. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/9789264130852-en.pdf?expires=1603811705&id=id&accname=ocid194948&checksum=ED0BFE160E3A84E9CFAF1606C2E9B13F
OECD. (2018). Equity in education: Breaking down barriers to social mobility. PISA, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264073234-en
Oksanen, K., & Hautamäki, A. (2015). Sustainable innovation: A competitive advantage for innovation ecosystems. Technology Innovation Management Review, 5(10), 24–30.
Pawson, R. (2006). Evidence-based policy. A realist perspective. Sage.
Pischetola, M., & de Miranda, L. V. T. (2020). Systemic thinking in education and a situated perspective on teaching. Ciência & Educação, 26. https://doi.org/10.1590/1516-731320200015
Sahlberg. P. (2007). Education policies for raising student learning: The Finnish approach. Journal of Education Policy, 22(2), 147–171.
Sahlberg, P. (2011). Finnish lessons: What can the world learn from educational change in Finland? Teacher College Press.
Sahlberg, P. (2012). The most wanted: Teachers and teacher education in Finland. In D. Darling-Hammond & A. Lieberman (Eds.), Teacher education around the world. Changing policies and practices (pp. 1–21). Routledge.
Simola, H. (2005). The Finnish miracle of PISA: Historical and sociological remarks on teaching and teacher education. Comparative Education, 41(4), 455–470.
Schwinda, J., Gilardia, K., Beasleyb, V., Mazeta, J., & Smitha, W. (2016). Advancing the ‘One Health’ workforce by integrating ecosystem health practice into veterinary medical education. Health Education Journal, 75(2), 170–183.
Smith, K. (2016). Partnerships in teacher education:Going beyond the rhetoric, with reference to the Norwegian context. Center for Educational Policy Studies, 6(3), 17–36.
Stabback, P, (2016). What makes a quality curriculum? A paper for UNESCO-IBE, Current and critical issues in curriculum and learning. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000243975.locale=en
Stassen, M. (2003). Student outcomes: The impact of varying living-learning community models. Research in Higher Education, 44(5), 581–613.
Trifonas, P. P. (Ed.) (2003). Pedagogies of difference rethinking education for social justice. Routledge.
UNESCO. (2014). Teaching and learning: Achieving quality for all. UNESCO Publishing.
UNESCO. (2018). One in every five children, adolescents and youth is out of school worldwide. UNESCO Institute for Statistics. http://uis.unesco.org/sites/default/files/documents/fs48-one-five-children-adolescents-youth-out-school-2018-en.pdf
UNESCO. (2020). Global education monitoring report, 2020: Inclusion and education: all means all. UNESCO.
https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000373718
UNICEF. (2014). Child Rights Education Toolkit: Rooting Child Rights in Early Childhood Education, Primary and Secondary Schools. UNICEF.
https://www.unicef.org/media/63081/file/UNICEF-Child-Rights-Education-Toolkit.pdf
UNICEF. (2020) Addressing the learning crisis: An urgent need to better finance education for the poorest children. UNICEF.
https://www.unicef.org/media/63896/file/Addressing-the-learning-crisis-advocacy-brief-2020.pdf
Vahtivuori-Hänninen, S., Halinen, I., Niemi, H., Lavonen, J., & Lipponen, L. (2014). A new Finnish national core curriculum for basic education and technology as an integrated tool for learning. In H. Niemi, J. Multisilta, L. Lipponen, & M. Vivitsou (Eds.), Finnish innovations & technologies in schools: Towards new ecosystems of learning (pp. 21–32). Sense Publishers.
Välijärvi, J., & Sulkunen, S. (2016). Finnish school in international comparison. In H. Niemi, A. Toom, & A. Kallioniemi (Eds.), Miracle of education. The principles and practices of teaching and learning in Finnish schools (2nd ed., pp. 3–22). Sense Publishers.
Vallory, E. (2020). Preparing teachers for the schools we have or for the school we want? Challenges and changes in Catalonia (Spain). In L. Lefty & J. Fraser (Eds.), Teaching the world’s teachers (pp. 89–110). Johns Hopkins University Press.
Vitikka, E., Krokfors, L., & Hurmerinta, E. (2016). The Finnish national core curriculum: Structure and development. In H. Niemi, A. Toom, & A. Kallioniemi (Eds.), Miracle of education: The principles and practices of teaching and learning in Finnish schools (2nd ed., pp. 83–90). Sense Publishers.
Walpole, S. C., Pearson, D., Coad, J., & Barna, S. (2016). What do tomorrow’s doctors need to learn about ecosystems? Medical Teacher, 38(4), 338–356.
Wheeler-Bell, Q. (2017). Standing in need of justification: Michael Apple, R. S. Peters and Jürgen Habermas. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 49(4), 561–578. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2017.1279219
World Bank. (2018). World development report 2018: Learning to realise education’s promise. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1096-1
Wubbels, T., & van Tartwij. J. (2018). Dutch teacher and teacher education policies: Trends and ambiguities. In H. Niemi, A. Toom, A. Kallioniemi, & J. Lavonen (Eds.), The teacher’s role in the changing globalizing world: On resources and challenges related to the professional work of teaching practices (pp. 63–77). Brill Sense
Zhao, Y. (2020). Two decades of havoc: A synthesis of criticism against PISA. Journal of Educational Change, 21, 245–266.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitted article, which will be published online in the Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal (for short: CEPS Journal) by University of Ljubljana Press (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education, Kardeljeva ploščad 16, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). The Author’s/Authors’ name(s) will be evident in the article in the journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in the hands of the publisher.
- The Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit themselves to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
