Encouraging Teachers’ and Students’ Innovation with the Support of Teacher Learning Communities
Povzetek
The purpose of this paper is to share knowledge generated through the implementation of “Teaching Innovation Teams” as a strategy for teachers’ professional development and innovation at the University of Alcala (Spain). We analyse the contributions of this strategy to the facilitation of curriculum innovation in higher education and reflect on some of the achievements and results of the activities carried out by these teams, identifying the dilemmas and difficulties that teachers experienced and that hinder the development of curriculum innovations. Finally, we outline some educational contributions of Teaching Innovation Teams understood as a collaborative and formative strategy to facilitate educational change.
Prenosi
Literatura
Morata.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (2002). Dentro/fuera. Profesores que investigan. Madrid:
Akal.
Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (2003). Más allá de la certidumbre adoptar una actitud
indagadora sobre la práctica. In A. Lieberman, & L. Miller (Eds.), La indagación como
base de la formación del profesorado y la mejora de la educación (pp. 65-79). Barcelona:
Octaedro.
Christie, D., Cassidy, C., Skinner, D. et al. (2007). Building Collaborative Communities of
Enquiry in Educational Research. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13(3), 263- 278.
Dooner, A., Mandzuk D., Rodney, & Clifton, A. (2008). Stages of Collaboration and the
Realities of Professional Learning Communities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24,
564–574.
Goodnough, K., Osmond, P., Dibbon, D., Glassman, M., & Stevens, K. (2009). Exploring
a Triad Model of Student Teaching: Pre-Service Teacher and Cooperating Teacher
Perceptions. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 285-296.
Grushka, K., McLeold, J., & Reynolds, R. (2005). Reflecting upon Reflection. Reflective
Practice, 6(2), 239-246.
Hannan, A., & Silver, H. (2005). La innovación en la enseñanza superior. Madrid: Narcea.
Hargreaves, A. (2000). Four Ages of Professionalism and Professional Learning. Teachers
and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 6(2), 151–182.
Harrison, J., Lawson, T., & Wortley, A. (2005). Facilitating the Professional Learning
of New Teachers Through Critical Reflection on Practice During Mentoring Meetings.
European Journal for Teacher Education, 28(3), 267-292.
Könings, K., Brand-Gruwel, S., & Van Merriiënboer, J. (2007). Teachers’ Perspectives on
Innovations: Implications for Educational Design. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23,
985-997.
Kraft, N. (2002). Teacher Research as a Way to Engage in Critical Reflection: A Case
Study. Reflective Practice, 3(2), 175-189.
Kushner, S. (2002). Personalizar la evaluación. Morata. Madrid.
Margalef, L., & Pareja, N. (2008). Innovation, Research and Professional Development in
Higher Education: Learning From Our Own Experience. Teaching and Teacher Education,
24, 104-116.
Margalef, L. Canabal, C., & Iborra, A. (2006). Transformar la docencia universitaria: una
propuesta de desarrollo profesional basada en estrategias reflexivas. Perspectiva, 49, 73-89.
Margalef, L., & Ãlvarez Méndez, J. (2005). La formación del profesorado universitario
para la innovación en el marco de la integración en el espacio europeo de enseñanza
superior. Revista de Educación, MECD, 337, 51-70.
McLaughlin, M. W., & Talbert, J. E. (2006). Building School-Based Teacher Learning
Communities: Professional Strategies to Improve Student Achievement. New York: Teachers
College Press.
Ponte, P. (2002). How Teachers Become Action Researchers and How Teacher Educators
Become Their Facilitators. Educational Action Research, 10(3), 399-422.
Ponte, P., Axb, J., Beijaarda, D., & Wubbels, TH. (2004). Teachers’ Development of
Professional Knowledge Through Action Research and the Facilitation of this by Teacher
Educators. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 571–588.
Postholm, M. (2008). Teachers Developing Practice. Reflection as a Key Activity. Teaching
and Teacher Education, 24, 1717–1728.
Randi, J., & Corno, L. (2000). Los profesores como innovadores. In Biddle, B. (Ed.), La
enseñanza y los profesores III (pp. 169-230). Madrid: Paidós.
Zwart, R., Wubbles, T., Bolhuis, S., & Bergen, Th. (2008). Teacher Learning Through
Reciprocal Peer Coaching. An Analysis of Activity Sequences. Teaching and Teacher
Education, 24, 982-1002.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors are confirming that they are the authors of the submitted article, which will be published online in the Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal (for short: CEPS Journal) by University of Ljubljana Press (University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Education, Kardeljeva ploščad 16, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia). The Author’s/Authors’ name(s) will be evident in the article in the journal. All decisions regarding layout and distribution of the work are in the hands of the publisher.
- The Authors guarantee that the work is their own original creation and does not infringe any statutory or common-law copyright or any proprietary right of any third party. In case of claims by third parties, authors commit themselves to defend the interests of the publisher, and shall cover any potential costs.
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.en that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.